- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Gavin Newsome is a frickin retard!
Posted on 6/11/25 at 2:25 am to TenWheelsForJesus
Posted on 6/11/25 at 2:25 am to TenWheelsForJesus
quote:
Your defense of Gavin is that he only allowed a few blocks of his city to be destroyed? Oh, that's fine then. I was thinking a governor's responsibility was to stop people from destroying places citizens live and work altogether.
This here.Since DJT and team kicked the commies arse so bad and they know it they seem to have decided that their energies are better used moving the Overton window so violent riots and other nasty behaviors are now normalized behaviors. They want to use fear, the strongest emotion, to manipulate the dumbed-down masses to do their bidding.
After all, it’s just a few city blocks right? They have insurance after all, right? So, no harm, no foul.
And it’s coming to your neighborhood.
Posted on 6/11/25 at 3:09 am to Mr Roboto
Someone seems to have missed the part where Newsome and the state failed to protect federal law enforcement officers from doing their job.
Posted on 6/11/25 at 3:43 am to Mr Roboto
quote:
Newsom is fighting to uphold constitutional principles and the proper chain of command, which is a sign of leadership, not incompetence
Bull
shite.
Posted on 6/11/25 at 4:48 am to Mr Roboto
quote:By inflammatory "federal actions," you're referencing opening the borders, flooding states with illegals, enabling the murder of folks like Kate Steinle, etc?
the root cause: inflammatory federal actions that provoked these responses in the first place.
Posted on 6/11/25 at 5:01 am to L5ut1g3r
He is like most of the big democrats in California working off of Getty money.
The riots do keep the almost weekly reports of unscrupulous buyers of $Trump off the front page.
The riots do keep the almost weekly reports of unscrupulous buyers of $Trump off the front page.
Posted on 6/11/25 at 5:02 am to L5ut1g3r
There are lots of retards in California
Posted on 6/11/25 at 5:04 am to Mr Roboto
quote:
Newsom’s pushback on federal troops wasn’t about shirking duty, it was about respecting state rights and avoiding a military overreach that could’ve sparked worse chaos
Holy bullshite. Newsome is fine with the rioting, just like he was the fires because it doesn't affect him personally. Never let a crisis go to waste, after it is over he can go and get the feds to cut a big check and use the money for social BS programs. Rinse and repeat
.
Gavin was made to look like a fool today when the President showed the phone call receipts. Progs will still support him.
Posted on 6/11/25 at 6:03 am to L5ut1g3r
Gavin sucks at his job
Poll indicates a 33% approval rating, with a majority of respondents saying he should not run for president.
Poll shows Newsom with a 33% approval rating and a 42% disapproval rating. This reflects a decrease from a February poll by Emerson, which showed a 42% approval and 40% disapproval.
A recent UC Berkeley LA Times poll indicates 44% of Californians approve of the job Newsom is doing, while 49% disapprove. This represents an 11-point drop since February.
Poll indicates a 33% approval rating, with a majority of respondents saying he should not run for president.
Poll shows Newsom with a 33% approval rating and a 42% disapproval rating. This reflects a decrease from a February poll by Emerson, which showed a 42% approval and 40% disapproval.
A recent UC Berkeley LA Times poll indicates 44% of Californians approve of the job Newsom is doing, while 49% disapprove. This represents an 11-point drop since February.
Posted on 6/11/25 at 6:06 am to Jtomka
quote:
Governor George Wallace tried to defy the feds also.
Just curious. How many on PoliBoard would have sided with Wallace?
Posted on 6/11/25 at 6:15 am to Mr Roboto
quote:
The federal government unilaterally sending in military forces without the state's request is an unprecedented overreach that every state, red or blue, should be concerned about. Newsom is fighting to uphold constitutional principles and the proper chain of command, which is a sign of leadership, not incompetence.
Do you realize the national guard has been called to a state against its wishes multiple times in recent history?
In AR and AL during segregation to name a few.
Also Bush called them in to CA in the 90’s riots and Reagan called them in for campus protests.
Idk where you people are getting such wrong information. There is nothing new about this.
This post was edited on 6/11/25 at 6:28 am
Posted on 6/11/25 at 6:18 am to Mr Roboto
That dude there is a lil bitch.
Posted on 6/11/25 at 6:28 am to SippyCup
So Newsome is in place as Governor and policies are put in place that result in wildfires, homelessness, and riots, but libs wanna pat him on the back for dealing with it?
WTF?
It’s like, hey that guy shite his pants. Well, he washed his pants so he’s cool.
WTF?
It’s like, hey that guy shite his pants. Well, he washed his pants so he’s cool.
This post was edited on 6/11/25 at 6:32 am
Posted on 6/11/25 at 6:30 am to Mr Roboto
quote:
Mr Roboto
Thanks for the clarifying post, Gavin. Your address last night was a technological mess.
Idiot.
Posted on 6/11/25 at 6:34 am to Athis
You think she wants illegals living around her?
Posted on 6/11/25 at 6:50 am to Mr Roboto
quote:
Newsom’s stance on sanctuary cities is about protecting Illegal residents and upholding state law
Fixed it for you
Federal Law > State Law
Posted on 6/11/25 at 6:55 am to Mr Roboto
“it was about respecting state rights and avoiding a military overreach that could’ve sparked worse chaos. ”
My oh my- seems like if this could have happened some 164 years ago a million American lives would have been spare right ?
My oh my- seems like if this could have happened some 164 years ago a million American lives would have been spare right ?
Posted on 6/11/25 at 6:59 am to Nosevens
quote:Democrats are at it again. No wonder Trump likes Lincoln so much.
“it was about respecting state rights and avoiding a military overreach that could’ve sparked worse chaos. ”
My oh my- seems like if this could have happened some 164 years ago a million American lives would have been spare right ?
They going to put you back in chains y'all.
Posted on 6/11/25 at 7:10 am to L5ut1g3r
Popular
Back to top



0








