- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Has anyone actually explained how the Biden allegations are debunked?
Posted on 10/7/19 at 8:34 am to armtackledawg
Posted on 10/7/19 at 8:34 am to armtackledawg
The media believes if they repeat a lie often enough people will take it as truth.
Posted on 10/7/19 at 8:37 am to mahdragonz
quote:
They are debunked bc they never were real.
Trumps team has never shown any hard evidence of illegality.
Completely irrelevant. This is what the media and the Dems can't grasp. Many voters can't grasp or don't care about the legality of it. Maybe it was legal.
The point that they miss is that Little Joe was paid $50,000 to be on the board of a company in an industry he knows nothing about, in a country he has no connection to and where he doesn't even speak the language, simply because his dad was VP. And Ukraine wasn't the only example. That, voters can easily grasp.
So can the rest of the Dem candidates. One of them will plant the dagger in Biden's back over this. Just wait and see. Just as Fat Chris took out Rubio, one of the lesser candidates will play that role in a debate and deliver the kill shot to Biden.
This post was edited on 10/7/19 at 8:38 am
Posted on 10/7/19 at 8:38 am to griswold
quote:
It’s a card in the Demwit deck similar to the race and the “no evidence” cards. When they are guilty of something and there’s a ton of evidence, they play the debunked card. That’s the signal to the MSM to drop the subject.
Whoa, whoa, whoa whoa! Stop the clock! Something just occurred to me.
Dims are always projecting their wrongdoings on others, right?
And you how fond they are of always accusing Drumpf of using dog whistles. Dog whistles, whistleblowers. Is there a connection?
I think I'm on to something...
Posted on 10/7/19 at 8:41 am to mahdragonz
quote:An April 21, 2014 NYTimes piece detailed a Joe Biden trip to Ukraine.
Its not real and there is no evidence. Debunking is just describing reality.
The Times said Biden went with a billion dollar aid package in large part "to assist in Ukrainian NatGas exploration and production." Three days earlier, HunterBiden, a drug-addict with no Ukrainian background and no oil and gas experience joined the Board of Burisma . . . one of the largest private natural gas producers in Ukraine. Why would that be?
In addition to $600K/yr there is a paper trail winding thru Cypriot banks and tied to Biden-related US accounts that looks a lot like money laundering and tax evasion.
The Ukrainian Prosecutor General was looking into Cypriot trail. JoeBiden had him fired. He was replaced as Prosecutor General by an alcoholic, non-attorney, with a criminal record, who promptly brought the investigations of Burisma and Biden to a close. JoeBiden referred to him as "solid".
Regarding China, CFIUS-approved transactions gave control over Henniges, an American maker of antivibration technologies with military applications, to a Chinese government-owned aviation company and China-based investment firm with established ties to the Chinese government. Hunter Biden's fingerprints are all over it.
That may not be proof of anything ... yet, but it sure as hell is evidence.
Posted on 10/7/19 at 8:42 am to TigerBait1971
quote:
Name them.
You're gonna make him break his Google machine
Posted on 10/7/19 at 8:46 am to TigerBait1971
You have to be a special kind of stupid to say there's no evidence of corruption surrounding the Joe-Hunter Biden Burisma connections.
Posted on 10/7/19 at 8:48 am to armtackledawg
Since neither the "honorable" Loretta Lynch nor the "honorable" Eric Holder chose to investigate -- just like they didn't investigate any of the massive corruption committed by the Odumbf*ck administration -- THAT MEANS that Creepy Joe has been fully exonerated in the mind of every filthy f*cking Dimocrap (including their Komrades in the MSM).
Posted on 10/7/19 at 8:51 am to armtackledawg
Because Joe and Barak said not a smigin of scandal or corruption in their term . Nothing . Nada . They wouldn’t lie to us right?
This post was edited on 10/7/19 at 8:51 am
Posted on 10/7/19 at 8:51 am to armtackledawg
quote:
That narrative keeps getting spewed in the media, but I have yet to see an explanation. Can anyone help?
A crack team of impartial investigative news journalists spent 5 minutes looking into it and shrugged. These impartial gumshoe warriors were the same group that discovered Trump was a Russian agent so you know they are legit.
Posted on 10/7/19 at 8:53 am to McChowder
Biden: I didn't do anything.
Media: Ok, cool. Carry on.
Trump: Read the transcript. The call was perfect.
Media: Obvious quid pro quo on call, Impeach now!
Media: Ok, cool. Carry on.
Trump: Read the transcript. The call was perfect.
Media: Obvious quid pro quo on call, Impeach now!
Posted on 10/7/19 at 8:53 am to McChowder
the problem is there is evidence. Documented evidence. But that doesn't seem to matter to anyone.
Posted on 10/7/19 at 8:57 am to armtackledawg
I will explain your question by asking a question
Why doesn’t the MSM say the Russian /Trump collision/conspiracy has been debunked ?
Why doesn’t the MSM say the Russian /Trump collision/conspiracy has been debunked ?
Posted on 10/7/19 at 8:59 am to Janky
They are debunked much like Michael went bankrupt.


Posted on 10/7/19 at 9:19 am to mahdragonz
quote:Except there is evidence, according to Rudy. He's stated there was money laundering, fraud, racketeering, and bribery done by Burisma, and he has the evidence proving it.
Because the original allegations seem to be horse shite.
They are debunked bc they never were real.
Trumps team has never shown any hard evidence of illegality.
Its like debunking that you are a man with wings.
Its not real and there is no evidence. Debunking is just describing reality.
And the fact the Ukrainians had been trying for over a year to get this evidence to someone suggests it's legit. Or at least the existence of something they consider evidence actually exists.
Otherwise, how do you explain why Ukraine was trying to pass along evidence only for Obama hold-overs in the Consulate, the DOJ, and State Dept. to be blocking it from reaching anyone?
And if there is evidence against Burisma, then it looks really bad that Joe got the Prosecutor General fired, the new Prosecutor General whom he personally approved only slapped Burisma with a small fine and closed the case, and his drug addict son who has no experience at all in O&G receives a few million dollars plus a $50k/month salary.
But you go on making biased excuses and ignoring actual reality so you don't have to curl up in the fetal position over the devastating blow to your hyper-partisan feelings. I'm sure lying to yourself is the best solution for your sanity/insanity.
Posted on 10/7/19 at 9:20 am to armtackledawg
It is a media magic word. They say the word "debunked", and it is done. No documented proof needed.
Posted on 10/7/19 at 9:39 am to mahdragonz
quote:
Because the original allegations seem to be horse shite.
You stupid mother fricking piece of disingenuous shite, Joe bragged about it, in front of witnesses, and while being recorded.
Posted on 10/7/19 at 9:47 am to armtackledawg
Trump should tkae Barron on the next forign trip and see if he can nail a three million dollar deal.
Posted on 10/7/19 at 9:48 am to armtackledawg
Trump should tkae Barron on the next forign trip and see if he can nail a three million dollar deal.
Popular
Back to top



0










