- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 6/22/25 at 7:22 am to TigerGman
quote:
damage went deeper and deeper till the job was done...
Typical Saturday night with the wife.
Posted on 6/22/25 at 7:23 am to stout
I'm not saying I believe this, but I already see a Kabuki theatre theory developing in alt media circles that goes something like this.
quote:
I hope I'm not wrong, but I feel like we've all just witnessed a highly staged and choreographed type of 'kabuki theatre', designed to appease the domestic audiences of each of the three involved parties in order to achieve de-escalation: 1. The Trump administration gave the Iranians warning they would soon bomb the three nuclear sites, giving them enough time to evacuate their staff and whatever equipment they could. That way the Americans can say to their own war hawks and sponsors that they've successfully done what was expected of them, at the same time not antagonizing the Iranians with more needless deaths, further destruction, and the potential for environmental catastrophe. Mission accomplished; 2. Netanyahu can tell his domestic audience that, as a result of his and the Americans actions, the Iranians have been devastatingly set back in their nuclear program. Therefore, the damage and destruction wrought upon Israel was worth it, and Netanyahu can claim to be a hero to his people; 3. The Iranians can claim the damage was minimal (which it likely was), and that they achieved successful retribution upon the Israelis. Therefore, all three parties will be able to de-escalate the conflict and tension from this point going any further. They have each tacitly given each other an off-ramp. Like I said, I hope I'm not wrong. We shall see...
This post was edited on 6/22/25 at 7:28 am
Posted on 6/22/25 at 7:23 am to stout
I'm sure with all those MOPs any rock formation is fricked up and as unstable as anything. Any transport shafts, elevators, air shaft, is fricked up and gone. I don't believe any of that untouched crap, that place is wasted. Iran is constantly under earthquake activity from tectonic plates bumping against each other in this region. That place is kaput. Good luck trying to rebuild through all that fractured limestone.
Posted on 6/22/25 at 7:24 am to stout
quote:Ok drop 6 more then.
Iran is claiming we only did superficial damage I see others backing this claim saying we only destroyed support functions of the facility, reducing its operations by 85% for now but that the main facility is still there and too deep for us to reach Also Iran says they relocated the Nuclear material prior to the attacks
Posted on 6/22/25 at 7:26 am to BayouBaw84
Posted on 6/22/25 at 7:26 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
That entirely depends on the party in the White House
This is your problem because it shouldn't
Posted on 6/22/25 at 7:27 am to stout
That’s why there were 6 bombs. 2 for each entrance. The first bomb clears the first 200 feet, the second takes care of the next 200 feet.
Posted on 6/22/25 at 7:30 am to HailToTheChiz
quote:
This is your problem
Uh, no
That comment was me describing others, not me describing myself
Posted on 6/22/25 at 7:34 am to stout
quote:
We dropped 6 GBU-57s on it. They are only designed to penetrate up to 60 meters
14 dropped plus Tomahawks
Posted on 6/22/25 at 7:35 am to stout
I believe the first bomb entered and as explosion occurred then second bomb entered. I can’t help but think of that last top gun movie where they actually had such a situation
Posted on 6/22/25 at 7:37 am to RockyMtnTigerWDE
quote:
14 dropped plus Tomahawks
Yeah, even if the actual bunkers survived in some form, I don't think they are getting back in there anytime soon.
And I'd imagine Israel/US will be monitoring those areas and should they attempt to restart those, will quickly get hit again.
Posted on 6/22/25 at 7:37 am to the808bass
The official number is 80.0087%
Posted on 6/22/25 at 7:37 am to RockyMtnTigerWDE
On June 19th and 20th there were 16 cargo trucks at the facility. There were no indications of nuclear radiation leaks after the bombing. Iran may have actually moved the nuclear material and/or any important machinery used
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.This post was edited on 6/22/25 at 7:40 am
Posted on 6/22/25 at 7:40 am to SlowFlowPro
Was that big dick display or was it really to antagonize and insure a fight
Posted on 6/22/25 at 7:42 am to stout
quote:
Iran is claiming we only did superficial damage
I see others backing this claim saying we only destroyed support functions of the facility, reducing its operations by 85% for now but that the main facility is still there and too deep for us to reach
Also Iran says they relocated the Nuclear material prior to the attacks
Posted on 6/22/25 at 7:46 am to Nosevens
quote:
Was that big dick display or was it really to antagonize and insure a fight
Very important question.
Something the pro-globalist faction keeps ignoring is that the people who reject globalism and intervention aren't focused on the act of bombing. The question is what happens now that we've started a "conflict". Is that conflict a war? Is this a "kinetic action" where Israel (which is the US, at this point, in terms of the conflict) wants regime change? If Israel is attacked by an Iranian proxy, what is the response? etc etc
Posted on 6/22/25 at 7:48 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
I hope I'm not wrong, but I feel like we've all just witnessed a highly staged and choreographed type of 'kabuki theatre', designed to appease the domestic audiences of each of the three involved parties in order to achieve de-escalation: 1. The Trump administration gave the Iranians warning they would soon bomb the three nuclear sites, giving them enough time to evacuate their staff and whatever equipment they could. That way the Americans can say to their own war hawks and sponsors that they've successfully done what was expected of them, at the same time not antagonizing the Iranians with more needless deaths, further destruction, and the potential for environmental catastrophe. Mission accomplished
It’s an interesting theory that does have some merit to it.
I listened to a Trump interview earlier this week where he talked about a situation where we had just hit Iran for something. He said that the leader from Iran called and said that they had to hit back to save face. He said that he understood and respected that. The Iranian leader told him where and when they were going to strike, and he also told him that no one would be harmed. When it happened, all of the missiles missed the base.
So, what you posted is NOT out of the realm of possibility. It does help de-escalate the conflict.
I do believe that his Administration purposefully left the Dems out of the planning. Those frickers hate America and would have sabotaged it.
Posted on 6/22/25 at 7:48 am to the808bass
quote:That would correlate with 82.4% of statistics are made up on the spot!
I have heard reports that we have only reduced operations of the facility by 76.7%.
Posted on 6/22/25 at 7:50 am to stout
quote:
Iran is claiming we only did superficial damage
I see others backing this claim saying we only destroyed support functions of the facility, reducing its operations by 85% for now but that the main facility is still there and too deep for us to reach
Also Iran says they relocated the Nuclear material prior to the attacks
I don't doubt this is possible.
They can run but they can't hide forever.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News