- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: ICE pulls over chicks who were following them
Posted on 12/29/25 at 7:53 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
Posted on 12/29/25 at 7:53 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
2024 Louisiana Laws
Revised Statutes
Title 14 - Criminal Law
§14:329. Interfering with a law enforcement investigation
Don’t know what the Federal equivalent statute is. Google it yourself
Revised Statutes
Title 14 - Criminal Law
§14:329. Interfering with a law enforcement investigation
Don’t know what the Federal equivalent statute is. Google it yourself
1
Posted on 12/29/25 at 7:55 pm to Catahoula20LSU
quote:It was a Socratic question.
Don’t know what the Federal equivalent statute is. Google it yourself
No such statute exists, which bans a citizen from simply following a police officer.
Posted on 12/29/25 at 7:56 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
Cite to statute please.
The "it oughta be illegal statute."
Posted on 12/29/25 at 7:56 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
Try again. None of that applies to two Valley Girls doing nothing but following an LEO. They weren’t interfering with anything or intimidating anyone.
These crimes are process crimes.
They’re completely subjective.
If LEO wants to arrest you for it, they can. They can take them in, book them, and give them a court date after they bail.
Now, whether it stands in court is another thing…
But if they’re following LEO around purposely while they’re conducting a raid or conducting surveillance, they can most certainly argue obstruction. Especially after a warning.
This post was edited on 12/29/25 at 8:00 pm
Posted on 12/29/25 at 7:59 pm to Deuces
quote:Bingo.
If LEO wants to arrest you for it, they can. They can take them in, book them, and give them a court day after they bail.
Now, whether it stands in court is another thing…
Be sure to equip your car with a dashcam with audio, and be prepared to ask very specific questions regarding probable cause.
Posted on 12/29/25 at 8:16 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
I said following and filming is not a crime, not interfering. You will probably get arrested. If you sue for false imprisonment, you will probably win. Law enforcement needs to learn the law.
Posted on 12/29/25 at 8:22 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
When was the first time you heard “Oh no, you di’n’t?”
Seems like the younger Fox women, especially the liberals were using “did-dent” “could-dent” and “should-dent” way back in the 2000s. I never really associated it with Ebonics, but then again, whenever I hear ghetto talk, especially from white people, I immediately turn the channel or walk out of hearing distance. BTW, Kenny Webster does this too. They sound like kindergartners just learning to speak. Guarantee you they think they sound sophisticated when they do that.
Posted on 12/29/25 at 8:25 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:There's also nothing that stops them from detaining the girls and questioning them, and finding out why they are following them
No such statute exists, which bans a citizen from simply following a police officer.
Posted on 12/29/25 at 8:26 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
Follow them. They dont know who you are or why youre following them. Sounds like attempted intimidation to me.
You planning to out their location or call up a crowd? Obstruction interference. intimidation
You planning to out their location or call up a crowd? Obstruction interference. intimidation
This post was edited on 12/29/25 at 8:32 pm
Posted on 12/29/25 at 8:29 pm to antibarner
They can question the girls, they can't detain them (legally) without REASONABLE suspicion of a CRIME. Not suspicious behavior, a crime has be articulable.
Posted on 12/29/25 at 8:35 pm to Tbone2
18 USC 111
Posted on 12/29/25 at 8:43 pm to antibarner
18 U.S.C. § 111 is a federal criminal law that makes it a crime to assault, resist, oppose, impede, intimidate, or interfere with certain federal officers or employees while they are performing their official duties.
Not following and filming. Supreme Court already said that as legal to do.
Not following and filming. Supreme Court already said that as legal to do.
Posted on 12/29/25 at 8:44 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
Short answer:
?? No — simply following and filming police in public is not a crime in the United States as long as you do not interfere with their duties.
That right is protected by the First Amendment and has been upheld by many federal courts.
?? No — simply following and filming police in public is not a crime in the United States as long as you do not interfere with their duties.
That right is protected by the First Amendment and has been upheld by many federal courts.
Posted on 12/29/25 at 8:49 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
Alyssa Milano used to say did-dent and could-dent all the way back in WTB.
Posted on 12/29/25 at 8:50 pm to Tbone2
quote:
They can question the girls, they can't detain them (legally) without REASONABLE suspicion of a CRIME. Not suspicious behavior, a crime has be articulable.
You've watched way too many 1st amendment audit videos.
Posted on 12/29/25 at 8:53 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
Cite to statute please.
USC 9MM FAFO
Posted on 12/29/25 at 8:55 pm to hogcard1964
quote:
You've watched way too many 1st amendment audit videos.
So what do you think the law is ?
Posted on 12/29/25 at 8:56 pm to Tbone2
If you're tailing and harassing LEOs, at the very least you're going to be confronted.
Posted on 12/29/25 at 8:57 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
Be sure to equip your car with a dashcam with audio, and be prepared to ask very specific questions regarding probable cause.
Or don't be a complete dumbass and follow ICE agents around as they do their jobs.
That is the easier option.
Posted on 12/29/25 at 9:13 pm to DMAN1968
quote:
If you're tailing and harassing LEOs, at the very least you're going to be confronted.
I see you added harassing in there. Following and filming is not harassment.
He said he would break her window, drag her out of the car and arrest her.
He would be in big trouble as he stated the reason as they were following and filming him.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News