- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: It’s been 13 days without a murder in DC.
Posted on 8/24/25 at 1:07 pm to 4cubbies
Posted on 8/24/25 at 1:07 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
Then you know how tiresome it is reading post after post of contradictions. You say you’re an actual conservative. Imo, the President deploying the military in this situation is not aligned with limiting government.
Yes it is and I have explained why, you have not debunked my counter at all on that point (nor even tried), yet you continue to (erroneously) make that claim.
Talk about tiresome.
If you want to continue to insist that, logically you would have to show that small government conservatives have argued that the federal government enforcing laws is not a legitimate function of government.
You haven't even attempted to do so (and we both know why).
Just saying something over and over again doesn't make it true. Small government conservatives being in favor of the government enforcing laws is not a contradiction. It's pretty much the definition of a small government conservative as opposed to an anarchist.
quote:
I answered the only question posed to me in this post.
LOL. Now do the previous 4-5.
quote:
I’ve mentioned this before but I don’t always have the bandwidth to respond to paragraphs and paraphrase in a single post and address each point or question.
We'll not even address the fact that you've done so before and just say fine, just answer one or two of the questions I've asked you to test your logic in this thread. The one you answered from the previous post was not a clarifying question or offered to test logic. Answer 2 or 3 of those.
Posted on 8/24/25 at 1:08 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
Have you been to a city hosting the Super Bowl beforea Super Bowl somewhat recently? Or New Orleans during MG in the last few years? Walking around town next to military carrying machine guns and literal tanks is unsettling. Living under what looks like military occupation should feel uncomfortable.
Posted on 8/24/25 at 1:10 pm to fr33manator
quote:
Bitch, you act like we didn't all see you during Covid.
What did you see?
Posted on 8/24/25 at 1:11 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
Did Washington DC experience a catastrophic weather event that destroyed a significant portion of the city and rendered utilities nonfunctional? I somehow missed that.
Seriously.. what do you folks want??
Washington DC upping security has saved multiple Black Lives that you folks claim to be the only ones that matter. Well black lives are MATTERING. They are LIVING.
And you folks cry about it.
Meanwhile one black guy under heavy influence of narcotics dies under a police officer… and you folks excuse the burning and looting of cities.
And you folks cheer the “protests” becside we can’t have black people dying. And you build statues to that one guy:
Meanwhile… name ONE of that 100 plus you mentioned murdered in DC without looking them up. One. No cheating.
Seriously… WTF do you people friken want?? What?? Absent anything that has tried and failed before.
What???
This post was edited on 8/24/25 at 1:21 pm
Posted on 8/24/25 at 1:11 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
You believe the most important job of the President of the United States is to enforce municipal laws?
No, that's the job of the municipality, but when the municipal system allows the commission of violent felonies and the state government also doesn't intervene, the lack of action then moves upward to the next level.
Are women not victims of violent crime in these cities?
Isn't Trump, in discouraging violent crimes, valuing women?
Didn't we just have a giant thread peppered with you—regardless of all evidence posted to the contrary—bemoaning society not valuing women?
Connect the dots for me. How is vastly reducing violent crime not a benefit to women?
Posted on 8/24/25 at 1:12 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
The cops and extra police presence don’t bother me one bit.
That’s great. Being around strangers with machine guns does not make me feel safe, especially considering the mental health crisis within the military.
You cannot be a real person expressing actual thoughts.
Posted on 8/24/25 at 1:14 pm to High C
quote:
You cannot be a real person expressing actual thoughts.
I'm convinced that she is a real woman expressing feelings thinly disguised as thoughts.
She just hates Trump. Anything Trump does has to be horrible. That's all that matters.
Posted on 8/24/25 at 1:15 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
4cubbies
Dumb. arse. Bitch.
Posted on 8/24/25 at 1:17 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
Have you been to a city hosting the Super Bowl beforea Super Bowl somewhat recently? Or New Orleans during MG in the last few years? Walking around town next to military carrying machine guns and literal tanks is unsettling. Living under what looks like military occupation should feel uncomfortable
And cultural violence is like a cozy blanket?
Posted on 8/24/25 at 1:19 pm to stampman
quote:
Walking around town next to military carrying machine guns and literal tanks is unsettling
How bout posting those pictures of tanks rolling down the streets outside the Super Bowl and in New Orleans.
Annnnnnnd GO!
Posted on 8/24/25 at 1:20 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
If you want to continue to insist that, logically you would have to show that small government conservatives have argued that the federal government enforcing laws is not a legitimate function of government.
I doubt a small government minded person would ever consider someone would assume he would support the federal government interfering in municipal government.
You keep pretending that this issue is simply about the federal government “enforcing laws.” You know very well that is not the crux of this issue. That’s just the only way you can frame this to fit your narrative that small government types advocate for the federal government interfering with municipal affairs.
quote:
Just saying something over and over again doesn't make it true
Right. Like you repeating that the federal government is simply enforcing laws and not exercising government overreach.
quote:
We'll not even address the fact that you've done so before
I don’t always have the bandwidth for that.
Posted on 8/24/25 at 1:23 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
What did you see?
You were a mask wearing, goose-stepping clapping seal when it came to government crackdowns...not on criminals, but on citizens just trying to live their lives and not giving in to the fear.
You are the worst, hypocricünt
Posted on 8/24/25 at 1:23 pm to CleverUserName
Apparently they were “armored vehicles.”
Try to contain your erections.
Try to contain your erections.
Posted on 8/24/25 at 1:25 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
armored vehicles
Like this is commonly mistaken for a “literal tank”. You’re stupidity it literally mesmerizing.
Posted on 8/24/25 at 1:26 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
I doubt a small government minded person would ever consider someone would assume he would support the federal government interfering in municipal government.
Thomas Jefferson was one of the biggest “small government” guys ever. Yet, he believed that one of the most important functions of the government is to protect the rights of the people. That’s how I view this.
Posted on 8/24/25 at 1:27 pm to fr33manator
quote:
You were a mask wearing, goose-stepping clapping seal when it came to government crackdowns...not on criminals, but on citizens just trying to live their lives and not giving in to the fear.
And how the frick did you draw this conclusion? My goodness. You have the nerve to address me as “bitch, “ then proceed to make up a whole bunch of shite that has nothing to do with me.
It’s abundantly clear why your wife left your sorry arse.
Posted on 8/24/25 at 1:28 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
Apparently they were “armored vehicles.”
So not “””literal””” tanks. Right? No turrets. No 50 cals. No tracks. No Tiananmen Square recreations. Just a friken armored vehicle.
And you know many municipal police forces have armored vehicles in their swat units.. correct?
All emotion. All the time.
This post was edited on 8/24/25 at 1:29 pm
Posted on 8/24/25 at 1:29 pm to 4cubbies
Those are just local PD, not soldiers.
But in general I have a problem with the militarization of police around the entire country. All these guys looking like they’re about to invade Fallujah bothers me. You can do you job just as effectively with a professional looking uniform.
But in general I have a problem with the militarization of police around the entire country. All these guys looking like they’re about to invade Fallujah bothers me. You can do you job just as effectively with a professional looking uniform.
Popular
Back to top


1





