Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Once again Rush is asking the pertinent question regarding Avenatti! | Page 2 | Political Talk
Started By
Message

re: Once again Rush is asking the pertinent question regarding Avenatti!

Posted on 5/10/18 at 3:05 pm to
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 5/10/18 at 3:05 pm to
quote:

he is doing this strictly for publicity.

He is on tv multiple times per day.

I am sure this has raised his profile quite a bit for future litigation.
If true, he is certainly not the first attorney to take a high-profile case as a loss-leader to generate additional work.

Or maybe Stormy Daniels has a wealthy patron. Time will tell.
This post was edited on 5/10/18 at 3:11 pm
Posted by TygerTyger
Houston
Member since Oct 2010
10888 posts
Posted on 5/10/18 at 3:07 pm to
Every single reply to ANYTHING Cruiserhog posts should be nothing more than this pic.




Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 5/10/18 at 3:08 pm to
quote:

You are saying that an former employee of trump inc selling access to trump isn't problematic? Seriously?
If he is selling ACTUAL access, it is potentially quite problematic. But that does not seem to be the case. The “client” terminated the arrangement because Cohen was NOT providing the access that they thought they were buying. Caveat Emptor.
This post was edited on 5/10/18 at 3:12 pm
Posted by Redbone
my castle
Member since Sep 2012
20664 posts
Posted on 5/10/18 at 3:08 pm to
quote:

once again you guys always bring up the Clintons and Obama when the topic isn't even about them.
Touchy, touchy. Are you scared of bringing them up? What do you want to hide?

MELT bitch melt!!
Posted by Seldom Seen
Member since Feb 2016
48737 posts
Posted on 5/10/18 at 3:10 pm to
quote:

quote:
cruiserhog








He really had TRUMP that time didn't he?
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
58542 posts
Posted on 5/10/18 at 3:20 pm to
quote:

You are saying that an former employee of trump inc selling access to trump isn't problematic? Seriously?


He has never been a member of the Trump administration and none of his attempts to get meetings for his clients ever went through. His access was so poor that ATT finally gave up on him.

In light of this, "selling access to Trump" is a bit of a stretch. So try again, what is this pertinent to?
Posted by GeauxLax
Roswell, GA
Member since Apr 2016
288 posts
Posted on 5/10/18 at 3:25 pm to
So salty

Please continue
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 5/10/18 at 3:33 pm to
quote:

once again you guys always bring up the Clintons and Obama when the topic isn't even about them.



You're confused.
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 5/10/18 at 3:36 pm to
quote:

Soros tentacles with ginger soy sauce is a delicacy in Singapore. Don’t hate.


"Mmmmm.....tentacles!"

Kurt Eichenwald
Posted by Kickadawgitfeelsgood
Lafayette LA
Member since Nov 2005
14090 posts
Posted on 5/10/18 at 3:41 pm to
AT&T
Posted by 56lsu
jackson mich
Member since Dec 2005
7928 posts
Posted on 5/10/18 at 3:51 pm to
no i'm not the obsession you guys have with everything Clinton and Obama is funny. poor deflection of all your boys b/s.
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
46967 posts
Posted on 5/10/18 at 3:57 pm to
THE HILL

Written by a former Clinton staffer

quote:

So exactly who is paying Michael Avenatti? And is he a lawyer, an opposition researcher, a journalist, or a campaign operative?


quote:

The more you peel back the onion, the more Cohen and Avenatti seem alike. Both are fixers who bend every rule they can get away with. Fairly or unfairly, Cohen is being put under the microscope and we can rest assured that every payment in or out will be fully scrutinized by law enforcement. But Avenatti can’t be given a pass on these issues. Americans are entitled to know just who this guy is, who is writing his checks and whether he legally obtained his information.


Cohen is Avenatti. Avenatti is Cohen
Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
28053 posts
Posted on 5/10/18 at 4:02 pm to
quote:

Rush believes Avenatti is working pro boner for Stormy Hoe


While I get the play on words, you can bet that Avenatti has a contingent fee contract with Stormy.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
134265 posts
Posted on 5/10/18 at 4:05 pm to
quote:

Cruiserhog
It's difficult to take you seriously since you've yet to be correct about anything you've ever posted.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
134265 posts
Posted on 5/10/18 at 4:07 pm to
quote:

AT&T
What about it?
Posted by The Spleen
Member since Dec 2010
38865 posts
Posted on 5/10/18 at 4:08 pm to
Avanetti has only said a couple of dozen times the fees are being paid via donations to crowdjustice.com page set up by him and Stormy.

Rush probably knows this, but also knows acting like he doesn't diverts attention away from the real story.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
134265 posts
Posted on 5/10/18 at 4:09 pm to
quote:

selling access to trump
Please post a link proving anyone who paid Cohen actually got access to President Trump. I'm betting you can't do it.

Thanks.
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
46967 posts
Posted on 5/10/18 at 4:15 pm to
No one is selling anything. Cohen doesn't work in the administration and these dollar amounts being thrown around look like pennies next to the direct political contributions and lobbying efforts that these same companies actually make. For Example, ATT openly donated 2M to the inaugural committee. If these are "bribes", they are horrible excuses for them.

The NYT is reporting that Mueller has already looked into this and moved on. Questions are starting to pop up about who Avenatti is really working for and how is he getting access to illegally obtained information. This will be another Fusion GPS shite sandwich for dems. Its only a matter of time.
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
36610 posts
Posted on 5/10/18 at 4:32 pm to
quote:

While I get the play on words, you can bet that Avenatti has a contingent fee contract with Stormy.


From a strictly legal standpoint, the case is a loser for Avenatti and he knows it. Cohen if he is competent undoubtedly had power of attorney from Trump for situations like this so the NDA was very much enforceable and then on top of that they brought the issue to an arbitrator and in binding arbitration the arbitrator said the NDA was enforceable. If this case went to trial, no doubt Cohen's lawyers would bring thatup and Avenatti would not have a leg to stand on. On top of that even though he's bringing a defamation case, that's pretty laughable as well.....read the details, most judges would force him to either settle for a small amount or laugh this guy out of the courtroom.

He's a Democrat operative that is using Cohen as a way to get at Trump, but he made a critical mistake in obtaining a SAR.....his arse is in a crack.....big time
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
36610 posts
Posted on 5/10/18 at 4:35 pm to
quote:

crowdjustice.com


yeah......right........ Obtaining a SAR from someone is a very costly fee
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram