- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Right on cue. .
Posted on 2/28/26 at 8:20 am to EphesianArmor
Posted on 2/28/26 at 8:20 am to EphesianArmor
quote:
"regime change" in Iran, Venezuela, Cuba, Gaza and...where else? How is this "Making America Great"?
At least some of our leaders won’t be able to launder cash through those regimes anymore.
If it liberates some people and stops the circle of corruption, what’s wrong with it?
Posted on 2/28/26 at 8:21 am to CharlesLSU
Joe Biden ordered air strikes on Yemen.....Were you screaming about that motherfricker?
He sent air strikes against Iranian forces in Iraq and Syria without Congress declaring war, were you screaming motherfricker?
He presided over a disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan one in which I am sure he did not involve Congress. Not a declared war.
Congress hasn't declared war since 1941 and it took Pearl Harbor to get that nest of do nothings to do so back then. They didnt even do so for 9/11.
Nothing since then that ANY US President has done militarily, NONE YOU TWAT, has been supported by a Congressional Declaration of War.
Now Pick up your little rape whistle and get back out there in the streets like a good little tranny and battle those fascists.
He sent air strikes against Iranian forces in Iraq and Syria without Congress declaring war, were you screaming motherfricker?
He presided over a disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan one in which I am sure he did not involve Congress. Not a declared war.
Congress hasn't declared war since 1941 and it took Pearl Harbor to get that nest of do nothings to do so back then. They didnt even do so for 9/11.
Nothing since then that ANY US President has done militarily, NONE YOU TWAT, has been supported by a Congressional Declaration of War.
Now Pick up your little rape whistle and get back out there in the streets like a good little tranny and battle those fascists.
Posted on 2/28/26 at 8:27 am to loogaroo
quote:
At least some of our leaders won’t be able to launder cash through those regimes anymore.
But maybe the "new (puppet) regimes" will give more generous "terms"?
quote:
If it liberates some people and stops the circle of corruption, what’s wrong with it?
In theory, its sound like "benevolence" -- but IS it really?
Let's assume it's a legit action for a sec. Wouldn't we want to know who exactly is delegating the "liberation", their "motivation and goals"? And how "liberation" is defined.
All that said, let's be honest -- this military adventurism is purely about imposing power and control.
Posted on 2/28/26 at 8:30 am to Toomer Deplorable
quote:
NEOCON REGIME CHANGE IS THE NEW MAGA.
We've been bamboozled; "MAGA" has always been code for "MIGA". (many just thought it meant, "America First".
Posted on 2/28/26 at 8:31 am to GooseSix
This proves how unavoidable war is in this case.
Even Trump had to act.
Posted on 2/28/26 at 8:31 am to Ailsa
quote:
Trump doesn't need Congressional approval for this. A President can 100% lawfully initiate military actions he deems necessary for up to 60 days without involving them.
Massie should look it up, it's in the War Powers Resolution of 1973.
The War Powers Resolution of 1973 was passed to rein in unilateral presidential war-making powers, not to hand presidents a 60-day blank check to wage war. It was passed after Vietnam to limit unilateral war-making, not expand it.
The WPR grants the President the authority for temporary action to respond to immediate threats. It allows limited military action without prior authorization but requires notification to Congress and withdrawal within 60 days unless Congress approves.
Initiating military force for a regime change operation against a sovereign nation is not a short-term defensive response — that is war. Under our constitutional system, Congress should debate it and vote on it.
Posted on 2/28/26 at 8:32 am to EphesianArmor
quote:
this military adventurism is purely about imposing power and control.
Partly. I like telling evil regimes…Don’t frick with us and stop killing innocent people.
Posted on 2/28/26 at 8:34 am to EphesianArmor
quote:
We've been bamboozled;

Posted on 2/28/26 at 8:37 am to Easye921
quote:
According to the US government since 1984. Long before Trump was ever in office.
So...ongoing "intel" that began 40 years ago? Based on who and what sources? (It wouldn't be the Bibi-Brigade, would it?)
Credit for responding. But..."Iran" is as much a current or ANY "threat" whatsoever as was Saddam and his "WMD" back in 2003.
Posted on 2/28/26 at 8:39 am to GooseSix
I do kinda agree that “funding or supporting” an ally in war as a proxy to get involved is too low a bar for unilateral action, but I’m probably missing something there.
Posted on 2/28/26 at 8:39 am to GooseSix
lol republicans are about to get absolutely murdered in midterms and ‘28.
Posted on 2/28/26 at 8:40 am to loogaroo
quote:
Don’t frick with us and stop killing innocent people.
Now do the CIA.
Posted on 2/28/26 at 8:41 am to jbdawgs03
quote:
He’s using Iran state media about a girl’s school being hit?
Is the argument that we aren’t at war?
I mean someone shoots missiles at my town and I’d consider us at war.
Posted on 2/28/26 at 8:44 am to loogaroo
quote:
Partly. I like telling evil regimes…Don’t frick with us and stop killing innocent people.
The "partly" needs to be fleshed out. The rest of yout "don't frick with us" equation can be applied even to those global malevolents within own goobermint who hate us (Ex: remember Fauxi, biolabs and the vax?)
Posted on 2/28/26 at 8:45 am to RFK
quote:
Congress hasn’t declared war since 1941.
Not to mention, Congress leaks sensitive intelligence like a sieve…. like it is their job …
Posted on 2/28/26 at 8:46 am to EphesianArmor
quote:
So...ongoing "intel" that began 40 years ago? Based on who and what sources? (It wouldn't be the Bibi-Brigade, would it?) Credit for responding. But..."Iran" is as much a current or ANY "threat" whatsoever as was Saddam and his "WMD" back in 2003.
They don’t know why we’re at war and don’t care.
Bibi was telling us Iran was about to have nukes back in… 1992.
United with Israel: timeline of Bibi warning about Iranian Nukes (1992)
This post was edited on 2/28/26 at 8:48 am
Posted on 2/28/26 at 8:47 am to Toomer Deplorable
Ooof. When was that fake promise dated?
How have the Pom-Pom wavers gotten? Or don't they care either way?
( TD comes with the receipts as usual
)
How have the Pom-Pom wavers gotten? Or don't they care either way?
( TD comes with the receipts as usual
Popular
Back to top



1







