Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Right on cue. . | Page 5 | Political Talk
Started By
Message

re: Right on cue. .

Posted on 2/28/26 at 8:20 am to
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
40876 posts
Posted on 2/28/26 at 8:20 am to
quote:

"regime change" in Iran, Venezuela, Cuba, Gaza and...where else? How is this "Making America Great"?


At least some of our leaders won’t be able to launder cash through those regimes anymore.

If it liberates some people and stops the circle of corruption, what’s wrong with it?
Posted by antibarner
Member since Oct 2009
26397 posts
Posted on 2/28/26 at 8:21 am to
Joe Biden ordered air strikes on Yemen.....Were you screaming about that motherfricker?

He sent air strikes against Iranian forces in Iraq and Syria without Congress declaring war, were you screaming motherfricker?

He presided over a disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan one in which I am sure he did not involve Congress. Not a declared war.

Congress hasn't declared war since 1941 and it took Pearl Harbor to get that nest of do nothings to do so back then. They didnt even do so for 9/11.

Nothing since then that ANY US President has done militarily, NONE YOU TWAT, has been supported by a Congressional Declaration of War.

Now Pick up your little rape whistle and get back out there in the streets like a good little tranny and battle those fascists.
Posted by EphesianArmor
Member since Mar 2025
4378 posts
Posted on 2/28/26 at 8:27 am to
quote:

At least some of our leaders won’t be able to launder cash through those regimes anymore.


But maybe the "new (puppet) regimes" will give more generous "terms"?

quote:

If it liberates some people and stops the circle of corruption, what’s wrong with it?


In theory, its sound like "benevolence" -- but IS it really?

Let's assume it's a legit action for a sec. Wouldn't we want to know who exactly is delegating the "liberation", their "motivation and goals"? And how "liberation" is defined.

All that said, let's be honest -- this military adventurism is purely about imposing power and control.
Posted by EphesianArmor
Member since Mar 2025
4378 posts
Posted on 2/28/26 at 8:30 am to
quote:

NEOCON REGIME CHANGE IS THE NEW MAGA.


We've been bamboozled; "MAGA" has always been code for "MIGA". (many just thought it meant, "America First".
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
45320 posts
Posted on 2/28/26 at 8:31 am to

This proves how unavoidable war is in this case.

Even Trump had to act.
Posted by Toomer Deplorable
Team Bitter Clinger
Member since May 2020
24434 posts
Posted on 2/28/26 at 8:31 am to
quote:

Trump doesn't need Congressional approval for this. A President can 100% lawfully initiate military actions he deems necessary for up to 60 days without involving them.

Massie should look it up, it's in the War Powers Resolution of 1973.


The War Powers Resolution of 1973 was passed to rein in unilateral presidential war-making powers, not to hand presidents a 60-day blank check to wage war. It was passed after Vietnam to limit unilateral war-making, not expand it.

The WPR grants the President the authority for temporary action to respond to immediate threats. It allows limited military action without prior authorization but requires notification to Congress and withdrawal within 60 days unless Congress approves.

Initiating military force for a regime change operation against a sovereign nation is not a short-term defensive response — that is war. Under our constitutional system, Congress should debate it and vote on it.
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
40876 posts
Posted on 2/28/26 at 8:32 am to
quote:

this military adventurism is purely about imposing power and control.


Partly. I like telling evil regimes…Don’t frick with us and stop killing innocent people.
Posted by Toomer Deplorable
Team Bitter Clinger
Member since May 2020
24434 posts
Posted on 2/28/26 at 8:34 am to
quote:

We've been bamboozled;


Posted by EphesianArmor
Member since Mar 2025
4378 posts
Posted on 2/28/26 at 8:37 am to
quote:

According to the US government since 1984. Long before Trump was ever in office.


So...ongoing "intel" that began 40 years ago? Based on who and what sources? (It wouldn't be the Bibi-Brigade, would it?)

Credit for responding. But..."Iran" is as much a current or ANY "threat" whatsoever as was Saddam and his "WMD" back in 2003.

Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
92669 posts
Posted on 2/28/26 at 8:37 am to
Where the massie figs now?
Posted by mcpotiger
Missouri
Member since Mar 2005
9048 posts
Posted on 2/28/26 at 8:39 am to
Frick this dude . Pussy!!
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
47098 posts
Posted on 2/28/26 at 8:39 am to
I do kinda agree that “funding or supporting” an ally in war as a proxy to get involved is too low a bar for unilateral action, but I’m probably missing something there.
Posted by illinitiger
North then South
Member since Feb 2009
3315 posts
Posted on 2/28/26 at 8:39 am to
lol republicans are about to get absolutely murdered in midterms and ‘28.
Posted by Toomer Deplorable
Team Bitter Clinger
Member since May 2020
24434 posts
Posted on 2/28/26 at 8:40 am to
quote:

Don’t frick with us and stop killing innocent people.


Now do the CIA.



Posted by tide06
Member since Oct 2011
21996 posts
Posted on 2/28/26 at 8:41 am to
quote:

He’s using Iran state media about a girl’s school being hit?

Is the argument that we aren’t at war?

I mean someone shoots missiles at my town and I’d consider us at war.
Posted by TDTOM
Member since Jan 2021
25548 posts
Posted on 2/28/26 at 8:43 am to
Leave
Posted by EphesianArmor
Member since Mar 2025
4378 posts
Posted on 2/28/26 at 8:44 am to
quote:

Partly. I like telling evil regimes…Don’t frick with us and stop killing innocent people.


The "partly" needs to be fleshed out. The rest of yout "don't frick with us" equation can be applied even to those global malevolents within own goobermint who hate us (Ex: remember Fauxi, biolabs and the vax?)

Posted by cadillacattack
the ATL
Member since May 2020
10256 posts
Posted on 2/28/26 at 8:45 am to
quote:

Congress hasn’t declared war since 1941.


Not to mention, Congress leaks sensitive intelligence like a sieve…. like it is their job …
Posted by tide06
Member since Oct 2011
21996 posts
Posted on 2/28/26 at 8:46 am to
quote:

So...ongoing "intel" that began 40 years ago? Based on who and what sources? (It wouldn't be the Bibi-Brigade, would it?) Credit for responding. But..."Iran" is as much a current or ANY "threat" whatsoever as was Saddam and his "WMD" back in 2003.

They don’t know why we’re at war and don’t care.

Bibi was telling us Iran was about to have nukes back in… 1992.



United with Israel: timeline of Bibi warning about Iranian Nukes (1992)
This post was edited on 2/28/26 at 8:48 am
Posted by EphesianArmor
Member since Mar 2025
4378 posts
Posted on 2/28/26 at 8:47 am to
Ooof. When was that fake promise dated?

How have the Pom-Pom wavers gotten? Or don't they care either way?

( TD comes with the receipts as usual )
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram