- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Rot Roh - Dan Bongino
Posted on 8/19/25 at 8:14 pm to FLTech
Posted on 8/19/25 at 8:14 pm to FLTech
Seeds planted today for a harvest in the months to come. For the record, I don't expect any major habbenings until after the midterms.
Well, except Brennan & Comey. I think they're in significant jeopardy here in 2025. We'll have to see how the rest of the calendar year shakes out for those two.
Well, except Brennan & Comey. I think they're in significant jeopardy here in 2025. We'll have to see how the rest of the calendar year shakes out for those two.
0
Posted on 8/19/25 at 8:20 pm to Bunk Moreland
quote:
I don't understand. Why can't DOJ prosecute whatever Kash and Dan refer? Why does FBI need a guy to do this?
I dont get why so many here still have so much faith in Kash and Dan. They have been by far the biggest disappointments of this administration, I would say its Bondi but to be fair to her, none of us expected nearly as much from her
Whenever the pressure from the base mounts, Dan posts something along the lines of "Ive seen things you wont believe, trust me bro big things coming soon" - and then the cycle starts all over again. Zero big things.
Frankly, Trump should have fired Bondi, Kash and Dan after they brought the influencers to hold up binders. The DOJ team is either in over its head, or they think we are all retards at this point.
They need to show some balls and start arresting people. The DHS has no problem testing the legal limits of what they can do in regards to getting illegals out. Bessent has no problem seeing how far he can wield tariffs without congressional approval. Hegseth has no problem telling everyone to frick off when needed. Why are Bondi, Kash and Dan incapable of showing the same initiative?
Posted on 8/19/25 at 8:22 pm to FLTech
I'll believe Lucy doesn't yank the football away when I see it.
Posted on 8/19/25 at 8:22 pm to KCT
quote:
This is why the Missouri AG was brought in, but it's not a slap in the face to Dan Bongino. Dan has a law enforcement/Secret Service type of background. He doesn't have a background in law (not a lawyer).
Exactly. When you bring charges there is legal protocol and what not. This is so when the perps are charged it’s done with t’s crossed and i’s dotted so they don’t get off due to a technicality
Posted on 8/19/25 at 8:28 pm to FLTech
This makes no sense in the way you are presenting it.
Posted on 8/19/25 at 8:30 pm to Bunk Moreland
quote:
I don't understand. Why can't DOJ prosecute whatever Kash and Dan refer? Why does FBI need a guy to do this?
I guess they want a prosecuting attorney right there next to him.
Posted on 8/19/25 at 8:31 pm to aTmTexas Dillo
It makes sense to get a real prosecutor, I don’t know why this is a question
Posted on 8/19/25 at 8:37 pm to CamdenTiger
quote:
It makes sense to get a real prosecutor, I don’t know why this is a question
I agree. I’m wanting to believe that there is so much coming, that extra experienced help can help process the load. I want the cases well prepared to bring justice.
Posted on 8/19/25 at 8:40 pm to OldManRiver
Dan does not have the power to charge anyone because he's law enforcement. Not an AG.
Posted on 8/19/25 at 8:46 pm to FLTech
Hey OP, a little difficult to understand what you're trying to say exactly.
Could it be that since Dan B. isn't a lawyer with no background in prosecution, could he be bringing in prosecutorial help to examine the evidence he has gathered as a "federal investigator"? Review to see if evidence is sufficient for advancement to prosecution?
Is this what I think you're saying?
Could it be that since Dan B. isn't a lawyer with no background in prosecution, could he be bringing in prosecutorial help to examine the evidence he has gathered as a "federal investigator"? Review to see if evidence is sufficient for advancement to prosecution?
Is this what I think you're saying?
Posted on 8/19/25 at 8:54 pm to Victor R Franko
That’s my take.
Posted on 8/19/25 at 9:01 pm to KCT
quote:
Free Beer Tomorrow
quote:
the party is about to begin.
quote:
about to
Posted on 8/19/25 at 9:01 pm to ValZacs
I think you guys are letting the hopium get the better of you.
The FBI has arrested thousands of people this year without having a prosecutor hold their hands. If they did want help, then there is plenty of help available at the DOJ. I don't see why this extra help would need to be at the level of Co-Deputy Director of the FBI. That is a leadership post, not an extra hand. Hell, Tulsi has done a ton of their leg work for them.
I hope I'm wrong and they fill up Gitmo, but I think we are in for a few indictments and disappointment.
The FBI has arrested thousands of people this year without having a prosecutor hold their hands. If they did want help, then there is plenty of help available at the DOJ. I don't see why this extra help would need to be at the level of Co-Deputy Director of the FBI. That is a leadership post, not an extra hand. Hell, Tulsi has done a ton of their leg work for them.
I hope I'm wrong and they fill up Gitmo, but I think we are in for a few indictments and disappointment.
Posted on 8/19/25 at 9:04 pm to FLTech
Reading this thread is depressing but it actually explains why a lot of you get so frustrated at things you don’t understand.
This post was edited on 8/19/25 at 9:10 pm
Posted on 8/19/25 at 9:05 pm to Good Times
quote:
I agree. I’m wanting to believe that there is so much coming, that extra experienced help can help process the load. I want the cases well prepared to bring justice.
Yeah, not only getting a prosecuting attorney but an AG to boot. And the AG enthusiastically gave up his state gig. All those people who are under investigation by the DOJ via grand jury know they are targets. There is a ton going on out there and I heard multiple grand juries.
Posted on 8/19/25 at 9:16 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
Reading this thread is depressing but it actually explains why a lot of you get so frustrated at things you don’t understand.
What is it you want us to know? Is it that a prosecuting attorney is not needed as a deputy in the FBI? I choose to believe as shite hits the fan, they need the former AGs legal experience. Remember, Bongino started that we can't can't run and maintain a representative republic with the shite all those democrats have done
Posted on 8/19/25 at 9:29 pm to FLTech
quote:what?
because Dan does not have the power to charge anyone because of his experience
Posted on 8/19/25 at 9:30 pm to FLTech
quote:huh?
Why? Because they have several and need more for the amount of corruption they have discovered. They need more bodies for the sheer amount of volume of fraud and corruption they have discovered
Are you just pulling this stuff out of your arse?
Posted on 8/19/25 at 9:34 pm to Meauxjeaux
quote:
Oh, and for the record, my opinion is Bongino’s fricking useless.
he's in a role that is not suited for him. He should have been given command of a field office.. (SAC of Chicago??) I think he would have absolutely knocked it out of the park in that type of role. The deputy director level job is basically an executive type role, not his skill set, not saying he can't do it, just not his forte
This post was edited on 8/19/25 at 9:35 pm
Posted on 8/19/25 at 9:43 pm to FLTech
quote:
shite is about to go down
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News