- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SCOTUS Tariff Ruling is in: 6-3 against tariffs.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:34 am to Indefatigable
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:34 am to Indefatigable
quote:
And in doing so, as opposed to simply enacting the tariffs legally, he gained what?
A bunch of confused cultists.
He's effectively out of time, so Plan B will be more of the same.
0
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:35 am to Indefatigable
quote:
And compete with the dozens or more people who sit with him every day and knew this?
Trump knew it to. What is the outcome of this? You and others are already talking about it.
Everybody knows Trump has other ways to do this. Why did he choose this method first?
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:35 am to GooseSix
quote:
So other nations can enforce tarriffs, but not the U.S. Stupid mother frickers!
That’s not at all what was decided.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:36 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:quote:
SHHH!!! You mean Trump "accidentally" preempted them?
Holy shite
No biggie. Just add "secretly a long-term play to shrink the power of federal government by forcing a ruling" to the list of goals for tariffs. Right next to "bring manufacturing back" and "make it cheaper to manufacture overseas"
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:36 am to wackatimesthree
quote:
That's not what he said. Obviously Trump wanted the opposite ruling, but he also knew it was a long shot (only the cult members didn't know that). But you don't know unless you force the ruling.
So you’re saying that testing the framework of constitutional and administrative law was the priority or goal? Is Trump moonlighting as a judicial clerk?
Seems inefficient given the short window he has to govern.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:36 am to NC_Tigah
So, we can now expect prices to come down, dramatically, right?
Because tariff claims for why thing were so expensive were pretty common by companies.
Well?
Because tariff claims for why thing were so expensive were pretty common by companies.
Well?
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:36 am to Timeoday
quote:
They seem to have made the ruling specific to IEEPA usage.
Well yeah.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:36 am to Ingeniero
quote:
secretly a long-term play to shrink the power of federal government
It didn't shrink anything. It just failed to expand the executive power.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:37 am to SDVTiger
quote:
Lets see if Johnson has the ballz to get this done through Congress
They haven't done so, so I wouldn't expect it now
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:37 am to RidiculousHype
quote:
Congress, not POTUS
Finally, someone gets it. I'm not opposed to tariffs but its not POTUS's call.
This post was edited on 2/20/26 at 9:38 am
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:37 am to BCreed1
quote:
Why did he choose this method first?
That would be the question, because it only resulted in confusion and wasted time.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:37 am to wackatimesthree
This stuff used to be called government just doing its thing. Now every ruling, announcement, policy suggestion, etc. is either a massive win, massive loss, conspiracy or attempt at authoritarianism/communism/facism, whatever, depending on what you predicted or hoped for.
Everyone needs politics to be a drama series these days.
Everyone needs politics to be a drama series these days.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:37 am to AlterEd
quote:
Well, frick.
Man, don't give up.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:37 am to NC_Tigah
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:38 am to wackatimesthree
quote:
This is the correct answer.
Lincoln did the same kind of stuff.
As a result, what does it protect the USA from?
Now had he won, What would it have forced congress to do?
Some people want to believe Trump is stupid and that he is surrounded by stupid people. He isn't.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:38 am to BCreed1
quote:
Why did he choose this method first?
He didn't want oversight or reporting and tried another route that failed
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:38 am to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
So, we can now expect prices to come down, dramatically, right?
Because tariff claims for why thing were so expensive were pretty common by companies.
once prices go up and companies see people will still pay, they will never lower them.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:38 am to BCreed1
quote:
It wasn't unforced. It was intentional. He made them rule.
What?
is this some of that 3d chess BS?Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:38 am to RidiculousHype
The President's argument is that Congress gave the power to tariff to the Executive under certain conditions. Not that the President has the power to tariff without Congressional approval.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:38 am to texag7
quote:
It’s funny people buy the lie the Supreme Court is some holy 3rd branch of government. They are politicians like everyone else
That's what you say when they rule against something you like.
Page 7 of 26
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News