- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Stabilized zoomed in slow motion version of the shooting
Posted on 1/24/26 at 7:12 pm to Patato Salad
Posted on 1/24/26 at 7:12 pm to Patato Salad
Truth = deflection?
Who knew
If you care about words so much, then maybe practice what you preach or at the very least dont get mad when the tables are turned.
Who knew
If you care about words so much, then maybe practice what you preach or at the very least dont get mad when the tables are turned.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 7:14 pm to stout
Looks like cold blooded murder by a bunch of thugs to me.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 7:14 pm to loogaroo
quote:Whew, I don’t know man.
There will be no trial.
I’m betting there will be a trial.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 7:15 pm to stout
There’s a clear path to not get shot whilst carrying a brand new pistol when you are at a protest that includes interfering with law enforcement.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 7:15 pm to stout
Lol. When you answer another question with a question about something else it’s deflection.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 7:15 pm to stout
I can’t tell Jack shite from any of that Zapruder-like hocus pocus. We know that the dude had a loaded gun, was raising hell, and obstructing justice in an atmosphere already cranked up to 11.
What on God’s green Earth does any one expect to happen?
Also, if I were a degenerate gambler, I’d wager real money that this dude winds up being way less than desirable…
What on God’s green Earth does any one expect to happen?
Also, if I were a degenerate gambler, I’d wager real money that this dude winds up being way less than desirable…
Posted on 1/24/26 at 7:15 pm to MuffalettaDiver
You get plus 5 virtue points.
You can trade those in for two Zoloft.
You can trade those in for two Zoloft.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 7:16 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:
I’m betting there will be a trial.
The state will/might try. It was a federal agent on duty following the book.
There's no case.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 7:17 pm to Patato Salad
No, it's pointing out your blatant hypocrisy clutching your pearls over a term your side still calls a whole group of people
Posted on 1/24/26 at 7:19 pm to stout
Possible scenario:
Agent yells gun as the other agent pulls it out. Agent doesn't realize that's his buddies hand, he's just focused on that gun with a hand on it. When the gun comes out, he thinks it's the guy wearing it.
Agent yells gun as the other agent pulls it out. Agent doesn't realize that's his buddies hand, he's just focused on that gun with a hand on it. When the gun comes out, he thinks it's the guy wearing it.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 7:21 pm to stout
The current title to the thread that you started is: Stabilized zoomed in slow motion version of the shooting
Providing a blind link to esp. reddit in my book without context is, well, stupid.
Providing a blind link to esp. reddit in my book without context is, well, stupid.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 7:22 pm to burger bearcat
quote:
The entire conversation should be focused on why on earth do ICE agents have to control these idiots to begin with? That’s where the conversation should start
BINGO!
Posted on 1/24/26 at 7:22 pm to lake chuck fan
quote:
and tell ICE he had a concealed firearm.
In most jurisdictions, this is an affirmative obligation when encountering LEOs acting in that capacity.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 7:22 pm to MuffalettaDiver
I think it was suicide by cop because he couldn’t cope with the balding.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 7:23 pm to loogaroo
quote:
The state will/might try. It was a federal agent on duty following the book.
Eh. That’s not going to be the defense.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 7:27 pm to loogaroo
quote:
. It was a federal agent on duty following the book.
There's no case.
They still have to be performing their duties legally, which gives it a shot.
It's probably not likely, but possible.
This post was edited on 1/24/26 at 7:28 pm
Posted on 1/24/26 at 7:27 pm to the808bass
No trial
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
Officers were in a physical struggle with an armed suspect when a gun was perceived and the word “gun” was shouted. Under settled self-defense law, officers are entitled to rely on fellow officers’ reasonable perceptions. They do not have to personally confirm the threat.
Once a firearm appears during active resistance, the legal standard is simple: reasonable perception of imminent deadly force. That standard was met here. Freeze-frame activism doesn’t override real-time dynamics, and the law does not require officers to wait to be shot. This was a tragic—but lawful—use of force.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 7:28 pm to loogaroo
Uhhh what happens in this fairy tale of yours when there’s a dem admin???
Posted on 1/24/26 at 7:29 pm to stout
quote:
Freeze-frame activism doesn’t override real-time dynamics, and the law does not require officers to wait to be shot.
This will certainly be the defense.
Popular
Back to top



1









