- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Massie Plan
Posted on 6/6/25 at 1:11 pm to udtiger
Posted on 6/6/25 at 1:11 pm to udtiger
quote:
But tax cuts do not need to be "paid for" and i object to any statement that accepts that premise
That sorta depends on what they are and the magnitude. Yeah, you can grow the economy, but it's still probably accurate to say that the loss of revenue from tax cuts needs to be considered when looking at spending.
Posted on 6/6/25 at 1:11 pm to Seldom Seen
Now let him lobby his Republican buddies to get it passed.
Posted on 6/6/25 at 1:13 pm to The Egg
quote:
That prob would not pass
I agree with it 100% but also believe as you said that it would be DOA in the house because too many GOP congressmen were getting green new deal pork sent to their districts.
Everyone loves DOGE until your donors start getting cut.
Posted on 6/6/25 at 1:15 pm to Seldom Seen
He wouldn’t make it out of the first primary and everyone knows it. His proposal could have been written by anyone alive during the last 25 years: tax cuts and no spending is essentially what is proposing. The anemic cuts in the BBB are balked at by Rhinos no doubt they would whole heartedly support 2 trillion in cuts per year lol
Posted on 6/6/25 at 1:15 pm to Seldom Seen
Again. It's ok for him to say he is against cutting the deficit by 4.9 trillion because he isn't getting it his way.
It's ok for you to admit you don't like 4.9 trillion cut from it too.
It's ok for you to admit you don't like 4.9 trillion cut from it too.
Posted on 6/6/25 at 1:28 pm to tide06
every single budget bill is going to have pork.
what elon and massie are advocating for is zero pork, which is unrealistic. they know that to be true, as well
what elon and massie are advocating for is zero pork, which is unrealistic. they know that to be true, as well
Posted on 6/6/25 at 1:31 pm to Chancellor
Thats a perfect list. Can Massie put out a realistic version? We all know that one would never pass House or Senate.
Posted on 6/6/25 at 1:31 pm to The Egg
Massie and Rand tried to kill 2.8 Trillion in deficit cuts.
Like I said. They are standing against 4.9 Trillion in deficit cuts/reduction.
How very conservative of them.
Like I said. They are standing against 4.9 Trillion in deficit cuts/reduction.
How very conservative of them.
Posted on 6/6/25 at 1:33 pm to BCreed1
quote:
BCreed1
Quickly throwing your name into the ring for biggest retard on this board
Easily baited by shiny objects while the pickpocket reaches over and steals from your wallet
Posted on 6/6/25 at 1:36 pm to Ingeniero
Wait. So you agree with the CBO when it suits you... but not the other cbo report. LOL.
Can't make this up!!
Can't make this up!!
Posted on 6/6/25 at 1:36 pm to Rip Torn
quote:
he would support finishing the border wall and hiring more border patrol but I don’t even think he knows what he supports
Make it, it's own bill.
Posted on 6/6/25 at 1:44 pm to BCreed1
quote:
Massie and Rand tried to kill 2.8 Trillion in deficit cuts. Like I said. They are standing against 4.9 Trillion in deficit cuts/reduction. How very conservative of them.
Say it a few more times and you might actually believe it.
Posted on 6/6/25 at 1:47 pm to Ten Bears
quote:
Say it a few more times and you might actually believe it.
I believe it because it's true. Rand even went to the floor to try to out maneuver Trump.
Posted on 6/6/25 at 1:51 pm to Seldom Seen
Logic and fiscal responsibility has no place in our government.
Trump has to pay his MIC bosses since he is their cuck along with Bibi’s.
Trump has to pay his MIC bosses since he is their cuck along with Bibi’s.
Posted on 6/6/25 at 1:51 pm to Seldom Seen
Here's my plan:
No taxes for anyone
No spending at all
All politicians executed
My plan is as realistic and likely to pass as Massie's. But hey, he says things that makes us feel warm and tingly so the fact that he will never be able to deliver on his absurd plan is irrelevant. We are conservatives and that means we care about words and virtues more than results and practicality.
No taxes for anyone
No spending at all
All politicians executed
My plan is as realistic and likely to pass as Massie's. But hey, he says things that makes us feel warm and tingly so the fact that he will never be able to deliver on his absurd plan is irrelevant. We are conservatives and that means we care about words and virtues more than results and practicality.
Posted on 6/6/25 at 1:52 pm to udtiger
quote:
I have no issue with gutting spending. But tax cuts do not need to be "paid for" and i object to any statement that accepts that premise
So you are fine cutting taxes and increasing the deficit because who cares, it’s not your debt right?
Short-sighted stupidity of Trumpets always amazes me.
Posted on 6/6/25 at 1:54 pm to Geauxgurt
quote:
Geauxgurt
Yet another poster here to say he doesn't want the deficit cut!
NICE
Posted on 6/6/25 at 1:54 pm to Geauxgurt
Just keep spending and cut taxes. What, you hate tax cuts? Commie!
Posted on 6/6/25 at 2:02 pm to BCreed1
quote:
Yet another poster here to say he doesn't want the deficit cut! NICE
Yet another moron with no reading comprehension skills.
Cutting taxes without cutting spending much less increasing net spending will not reduce the deficit but increase it, you moron.
And BCreed, why don’t you post your truncated list of the BBB that ignores the hull of increased spending your masters are trying to pass in that piece of shite bill.
This post was edited on 6/6/25 at 2:04 pm
Posted on 6/6/25 at 2:07 pm to Seldom Seen
Green new deal piece would mean it requires 60 votes, right?
This was supposed to list the pork, anyone still just saying “remove pork” as their “plan” is being dishonest at best. Name it, list it, or stfu.
Fine with removing SALT. Is he saying too much immigration funding?
How much medicaid reform can they do before it required the 60 votes instead of 50…
This was supposed to list the pork, anyone still just saying “remove pork” as their “plan” is being dishonest at best. Name it, list it, or stfu.
Fine with removing SALT. Is he saying too much immigration funding?
How much medicaid reform can they do before it required the 60 votes instead of 50…
Popular
Back to top



0






