- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Truth About Ahmaud Arbery
Posted on 5/10/20 at 5:27 pm to Turbeauxdog
Posted on 5/10/20 at 5:27 pm to Turbeauxdog
“Seeing anything” doesn’t get them off the hook.
1
Posted on 5/10/20 at 5:28 pm to the808bass
We’ll see what immediate knowledge they had as the case unfolds.
The coincidence bothers you a touch doesn’t it?
The coincidence bothers you a touch doesn’t it?
Posted on 5/10/20 at 5:31 pm to Turbeauxdog
They didn’t see it or hear a felony that we know of now.
I’m not sure why I would be bothered. If they’re not guilty, they’re not guilty.
I’m not sure why I would be bothered. If they’re not guilty, they’re not guilty.
Posted on 5/10/20 at 5:42 pm to the808bass
quote:
I’m not sure why I would be bothered. If they’re not guilty, they’re not guilty
Same here, if the playtime police murdered the timberland trail runner and suburban architecture admirer, I hope they hang.
Edited for nickname I liked better
This post was edited on 5/10/20 at 6:01 pm
Posted on 5/10/20 at 5:43 pm to Turbeauxdog
They didn’t tell police they saw it happen. So idk what you think will come out.
Posted on 5/10/20 at 5:46 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
They didn’t tell police they saw it happen. So idk what you think will come out.
The police report didn’t mention the interior design tour minutes earlier either, seems really thorough.
Posted on 5/10/20 at 5:47 pm to troyt37
quote:
What if he is armed? They are supposed to stop him with their dick in their hand?
Why did they have to stop him at all?
Posted on 5/10/20 at 5:48 pm to Turbeauxdog
quote:
The police report didn’t mention the interior design tour minutes earlier either, seems really thorough.
Probably because the McDaniels didn’t know about it.
If they said “we saw this guy committing a burglary” it’s a very different story isn’t it?
You understand that the “burglary” happening isn’t as revenant as how much as if the McDaniels new about it.
This post was edited on 5/10/20 at 5:55 pm
Posted on 5/10/20 at 5:52 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
Why did they have to stop him at all?
They have the right to, which you hate
Posted on 5/10/20 at 5:53 pm to Turbeauxdog
quote:
They have the right to, which you hate
And he has the right to tell them to frick off, which YOU hate.
Posted on 5/10/20 at 5:53 pm to Turbeauxdog
Do you think this creates a right or a limited circumstance where you can permissibly detain another person?
Posted on 5/10/20 at 5:55 pm to Turbeauxdog
quote:
They have the right to, which you hate
Except they didn’t. Mcmichaels had no knowledge of a current crime, just thought Arbery looked suspicious running. That was from mcmichaels himself. But don’t let facts get in the way of your narrative.
This post was edited on 5/10/20 at 5:56 pm
Posted on 5/10/20 at 5:55 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
And
Thanks for the admission.
The rest of your post is nonsense of course
Posted on 5/10/20 at 5:56 pm to AMS
Conjecture
Posted on 5/10/20 at 5:57 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
Probably
Hmmm
Posted on 5/10/20 at 5:58 pm to Turbeauxdog
If it comes out that the McDaniels saw the guy commit the crime than there is a whole other conversation to be had, but based on what they’ve said they didn’t.
There is no reason to believe the police report comepletey misconstrued what they said.
There is no reason to believe the police report comepletey misconstrued what they said.
This post was edited on 5/10/20 at 5:59 pm
Posted on 5/10/20 at 5:59 pm to Turbeauxdog
That’s not conjecture, thats from mcmichaels statement to police. ‘I saw him running and it looked suspicious because there were recent break ins so I called my son and got our guns and went to confront him.
His own description of events doesn’t match with your imagination of him going to stop an ongoing felony. Unless you suggest mcmichaels lied? Then that leaves massive holes and even more problems for his defense.
His own description of events doesn’t match with your imagination of him going to stop an ongoing felony. Unless you suggest mcmichaels lied? Then that leaves massive holes and even more problems for his defense.
Posted on 5/10/20 at 6:00 pm to Music_City_Tiger
quote:
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution first reported Barnhill's letter stating McMichael previously investigated Arbery.
Barnhill's letter, sent to the office of Georgia Attorney General Chris Carr, did not specify what the prior prosecution was for or when it took place.
The Brunswick News has reported Arbery was indicted for allegedly bringing a gun to a 2013 high school basketball game when he was 19. Family attorney Lee Merritt has acknowledged Arbery's 2018 arrest on shoplifting charges. But any reference to "alleged conduct from high school or shoplifting is absurd and has nothing to do with his murder," Merritt said
---------------------------------------------------------
He didn's doos nuffin!
------------------------------------------------------
I don't kn0w if they did away with brandishing laws in Georgia or not, but if you pull a gun out on someone you better use it.
The guy was a piece of crap, not a Rhodes scholar, and he knew he was doing dirt, not out collecting donations for UNICEF so stop acting like he was a saint and the media needs to stop showing his two-year-old HS yearbook picture and show us his prior mug shots to balance things out.
Oh, and that loaded handgun he was caught with at a High-School BB game dealing in more dirt you may ask >stolen<
Who the Frick packs a stolen loaded pistol to HighSchool?
Mugshots they have all gone *POOF* from google images?
Why can't the narrative support honest scrutiny?
Posted on 5/10/20 at 6:01 pm to ThePTExperience1969
quote:
they were brandishing guns attempting to effect an unlawful citizen's arrest
Not sure about any of this because the facts are in dispute to an extent but if I have a couple of guys drawing down on me claiming they are making a citizen's arrest, especially if I had been up to no good... I'm going to stay put and let the law get there to sort it out by the law. Odds are if they are claiming a legality by stating that it was a citizen's arrest, if I stay put, nobody is getting shot.
Additionally, odds are, if I don't wait for the law and make an aggressive move to disarm those making the "arrest"...someone is probably getting shot and the better odds are that it would be me.
I think there were obviously multiple bad decisions made between the parties involved but the decision to go for the gun was a fatally poor decision. We can't gloss over this point, bad choices often have consequences and changing even just one of those decisions by either party, alone, could have prevented the whole incident from happening and destroying at least three lives.
This post was edited on 5/10/20 at 6:03 pm
Posted on 5/10/20 at 6:05 pm to troyt37
quote:
What if he is armed? They are supposed to stop him with their dick in their hand?
They shouldn’t have stopped him at all, they should have let the cops handle it.
Page 16 of 33
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News