Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Trump just released a rendering of the new White House Ballroom | Page 3 | Political Talk
Started By
Message

re: Trump just released a rendering of the new White House Ballroom

Posted on 2/3/26 at 7:10 pm to
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
23875 posts
Posted on 2/3/26 at 7:10 pm to
I’m happy to see it. Of all the stupid crap that’s put us in debt this one of the least of my concerns.
Posted by Csmims
A sandy beach in paradise
Member since Jan 2019
3858 posts
Posted on 2/4/26 at 5:54 am to
There is a complete list of corporate and private donors. Some of them are actually democrats. Currently the White House can only hold a maximum of 200 for any event. The average state dinner has over 400 in attendance hence the use of circus tents and port a potties on the White House lawn. Over the years I’ve seen dozens of events held in tents on the lawn
Posted by BigTigerJoe
Member since Aug 2022
12471 posts
Posted on 2/4/26 at 6:51 am to
quote:

I was never in favor of this. Frivolous expense for a debt ridden country

I don’t look forward to the turnabout when democrats get control of the white house as they demand frivolous expenditures because….. well…. Trump did it

quote:

The total cost of the new White House ballroom is approximately $300 million, funded entirely by private donations from various corporations and individuals, including tech giants like Amazon, Google, and Meta, as well as contributions from President Trump himself. The project is designed to alleviate space limitations for state dinners and events.

quote:

As of August 2025, approximately $13.8 billion has been spent on the California High-Speed Rail project, primarily for constructing the Initial Operating Segment. The total projected cost for the entire Phase 1 is estimated to be between $89 billion and $128 billion.

quote:

The estimated fraud cost in Minnesota could exceed $9 billion, with more than half of the $18 billion spent on Medicaid programs since 2018 potentially being fraudulent.

quote:

Estimates suggest that Minnesota's daycare fraud could involve over $110 million, with a federal audit indicating that 11% of child care payments may have flaws, potentially affecting $231.4 million in claims.

Posted by BayouBaw84
Member since Oct 2016
3305 posts
Posted on 2/4/26 at 7:17 am to
quote:

Yep And guess what…. 2 wrongs don’t make this right Even if it’s donated by private companies and individuals 100% I don’t like selling rights to federal property Again, 2 wrongs does not make this right
Go tell it to your wife’s boyfriend. No one here is interested in listening to democrats when it comes to this country anymore. Democrats are everything that’s wrong with this country.
Posted by Grinder
Member since Nov 2007
2653 posts
Posted on 2/4/26 at 7:26 am to
quote:

Even if it’s donated by private companies and individuals 100% I don’t like selling rights to federal property


If Obama did this, you would be praising it.

Why didn’t Obama get donations from his generous, charitable wealthy friends to use for the betterment of the United States? Too much focus on his pick up basketball games?
Posted by SlidellCajun
Slidell la
Member since May 2019
16298 posts
Posted on 2/4/26 at 7:33 am to
quote:

If Obama did this, you would be praising it.


Hell no. I have no loyalty to Obama or any political human or party.
I voted for Trump because I’m a conservative with empasis on fiscal conservatism. I figured him to be the most conservative of the candidates and love the swamp draining promise.
I don’t see trump behaving in a fiscally conservative manner with this ballroom. It’s superfluous and sets more bad precedent. He and republicans won’t always be in power afterall.


Posted by SlidellCajun
Slidell la
Member since May 2019
16298 posts
Posted on 2/4/26 at 11:09 am to
Bottom line here
the companies making donations for the ballroom construction “want something from the government and they are paying for access to the President and others. They want something in exchange

Does anyone believe that Lockheed Martin is donating out of goodwill? Heh. They want defense contracts. want big defense department contracts. With that goes our expense increase for military spending which is already astoundingly high at a trillion a year!
Globalism
Posted by BigTigerJoe
Member since Aug 2022
12471 posts
Posted on 2/4/26 at 11:19 am to
quote:

Bottom line here the companies making donations for the ballroom construction “want something

You moved your goalposts.
quote:

I was never in favor of this. Frivolous expense for a debt ridden country
Posted by John somers
Los Proxima
Member since Oct 2024
1265 posts
Posted on 2/4/26 at 11:41 am to
You're not fooling anyone, leftist.

quote:

You moved your goalposts.


He does this in every conversation he gets into. It's his thing. He's a one trick pony.
This post was edited on 2/4/26 at 11:43 am
Posted by Giantkiller
the internet.
Member since Sep 2007
25025 posts
Posted on 2/4/26 at 11:45 am to
quote:

Panicans


I swear to Christ, you use that word more than any other dipshit on this board and I fricking hate you for it.
Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
18343 posts
Posted on 2/4/26 at 11:49 am to
quote:

One commie downvoter that hates America more than he loves penis.


Hates America/Loves Dick

Posted by EphesianArmor
Member since Mar 2025
4495 posts
Posted on 2/4/26 at 12:21 pm to
quote:

There is a complete list of corporate and private donors. Some of them are actually democrats. Currently the White House can only hold a maximum of 200 for any event. The average state dinner has over 400 in attendance hence the use of circus tents and port a potties on the White House lawn.


Is anyone else complaining other than Mr. Opulence himself, Donald Trump?

If limiting the guest list to 200 was good enough for 45 other Presidents -- and the "circus tents" routinely used for larger attendance -- why should a Louvre sized addition be necessary? Is the reason the accommodation of Trump's ego? (OR, is the "Ballroom" actually part cover for "other" construction"?)

I'm sure the tents were elegant and spectacular; and "port-a-potties" weren't like the one the serfs use at parks and construction sites.

quote:

Over the years I’ve seen dozens of events held in tents on the lawn


Cool sight I'm sure.

But again -- existing European palaces built hundreds of years ago can easily accommodate the larger venues; no European nation has ever built "Ballrooms". (I supposed the only nation who DO build them are in the Middle East.)
Posted by Deplorableinohio
Member since Dec 2018
7638 posts
Posted on 2/4/26 at 12:33 pm to
You obviously didn’t pay attention during the Biden years.
Posted by LSUA 75
Colfax,La.
Member since Jan 2019
4817 posts
Posted on 2/4/26 at 12:33 pm to
I like it.Tents and porta potties were a disgrace.
I just hope he doesn’t want to put his name on it.
Posted by SlidellCajun
Slidell la
Member since May 2019
16298 posts
Posted on 2/4/26 at 12:47 pm to
2 wrongs….
Ever heard of that?
Posted by EphesianArmor
Member since Mar 2025
4495 posts
Posted on 2/4/26 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

I like it.Tents and porta potties were a disgrace.


Those "port-a-potties" weren't the kind you and I whiz in at the park, brutha; they are regal, fit for royalty.

Ever been under one of those "circus tents"? The vibe and sight are amazing -- and you hardly even smell the left-over zoo essense from the elephant and monkey pheromones.

quote:

I just hope he doesn’t want to put his name on it.


What doesn't he put his name on?

Posted by SlidellCajun
Slidell la
Member since May 2019
16298 posts
Posted on 2/4/26 at 1:35 pm to
The government is going to be paying for this ballroom. Maybe not 100% of its construction but the day to day and the cost associated with the demands by those that are “contributing”
Posted by KingOfTheWorld
South of heaven, west of hell
Member since Oct 2018
7502 posts
Posted on 2/4/26 at 1:40 pm to
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
36458 posts
Posted on 2/4/26 at 1:41 pm to
Another aspect of this project and its cost is that they are clearly doing subterranean work as a part of this. The PEOC is located under there.

Surface level renovations at the WH are always a convenient cover up for underground work--its been that way since WW2.
Posted by PurpleCrush
ATL
Member since May 2014
2183 posts
Posted on 2/4/26 at 1:52 pm to
Eveyone enjoy the picture, bc none of yall will ever step inside and few will probably ever see it from the street.

Best part is he won't be around to enjoy it when its done.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram