- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump References Tulsi: “I Don’t Care What She Says”
Posted on 6/17/25 at 9:13 am to Yaboylsu63
Posted on 6/17/25 at 9:13 am to Yaboylsu63
quote:
My theory is Trump is positioning the rhetoric to make Iran think he is going to strike to force a deal.
That’s a fair point. We know Trump likes to play brinkmanship as well as bluff.
0
Posted on 6/17/25 at 9:13 am to Proximo
quote:
Yall are just looking to bitch and are very low iq
They’ll pretend to be concerned at something else by this afternoon
Posted on 6/17/25 at 9:14 am to Yaboylsu63
quote:
I get the feeling Trump is trying to appear unpredictable.
It is almost like everyone has forgotten the Trump playbook.
He wants to make deals, period.
Everything happening now is to help him achieve that goal.
Yet this board is full of people in panic mode.
Posted on 6/17/25 at 9:17 am to LuckyTiger
This should be viewed through the deep state prism … the IC is none too happy with Tulsi Gabbard, due to the structural changes she has been quietly making behind the scenes. They are quite apoplectic, in fact.
From June 6th:
LINK
From June 6th:
quote:
Before getting to the substance, it is worth reminding everyone of clear politicization within the ICIG when Michael Atkinson changed the CIA whistleblower rules in order to facilitate a false accusation against President Trump using CIA operative Eric Ciaramella and Alexander Vindman.
Atkinson worked with his former boss in the DOJ, Mary McCord, to frame the construct of an impeachment against President Trump. Also remember, Atkinson’s testimony to the House impeachment committee was sealed and classified by co-chairs Adam Schiff and Jerry Nadler who were part of the framing. That transcript has NEVER been released.
In the latest development, DNI Tulsi Gabbard has installed a key ally, Dennis Kirk, into the ICIG apparatus. Kirk is in place to monitor the political operations of the Intelligence Community and report to DNI Gabbard so that she can eliminate the bad actors.
To say the Deep State IC embeds are apoplectic would be an understatement. The Inspector General system within the Intelligence Community is a critical control mechanism for politicization of intelligence. The leaks to the media are to the Washington Post, because this core part of the IC is a CIA element. The CIA uses the Washington Post as their public relations and narrative distribution network.
LINK
Posted on 6/17/25 at 9:20 am to LuckyTiger
quote:The problem is, if Tulsi is right, what does Iran gain by not giving up something they don't have?
Trump References Tulsi: “I Don’t Care What She Says”
Posted on 6/17/25 at 9:21 am to NC_Tigah
Isn't that like asking to prove a negative?
Posted on 6/17/25 at 9:22 am to PorkSammich
quote:Tulsi was always a Democrat. She's the perfect example of a grifter. Even swapped parties to gain power
MAGA bout to turn their sights on Tulsi.
Posted on 6/17/25 at 9:22 am to LuckyTiger
JD needs to get in his ear. This is madness.
Posted on 6/17/25 at 9:23 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
The problem is, if Tulsi is right, what does Iran gain by not giving up something they don't have?
She is right. And Iran was in a no win situation because the truth doesn't matter.
This was about regime change and had nothing to do with nukes.
Posted on 6/17/25 at 9:23 am to NC_Tigah
The work thus far? The highly enriched uranium?
Posted on 6/17/25 at 9:24 am to Powerman
quote:
Worth noting that RT is Russian state media But it does expose this whole operation as a fraud
Putin backs Iran.
You are a Putin puppet if you side with Iran.
I don’t make the rules.
Posted on 6/17/25 at 9:24 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
There were a few things that stood out," Roman said, referencing activity at the Times Enrichment facility. "Iran reactivated an explosives manufacturing line, which could only be used to help that needed nuclear weapon…
efforts to put the fissile material into a shape which could be used for a nuclear weapon – that was reactivated as well." Roman added that these developments mirrored work Iran halted in 2003, when it froze its military nuclear program.
Experts believe Iran is enriching uranium to 60%, which puts it just below the 90% needed for a nuclear weapon, and have said there is no civilian use for 60% enriched uranium.
Here’s what’s happened since March
The boomers in here are getting duped by a reporter trying to get a gotcha while Trump boarded AF1
Trump’s response? The game has changed, idgaf what she said
Posted on 6/17/25 at 9:24 am to RogerTheShrubber
Now you like Tusli after cryong about her being a Dem
Cuckservatives
Cuckservatives
Posted on 6/17/25 at 9:25 am to LuckyTiger
“I don’t care what she said 3 months ago”
Equals
MAGA is turning against Tulsi???
Do you people even listen to yourselves speak before spewing shite out your mouths?
Equals
MAGA is turning against Tulsi???
Do you people even listen to yourselves speak before spewing shite out your mouths?
Posted on 6/17/25 at 9:25 am to FLTech
quote:
don’t care what she said 3 months ago” Equals MAGA is turning against Tulsi???
It’s pathetic
Posted on 6/17/25 at 9:25 am to Powerman
quote:
This was about regime change and had nothing to do with nukes.
So the nukes are a pretext for regime change.
Certainly a possibility.
Posted on 6/17/25 at 9:26 am to SDVTiger
quote:
Now you like Tusli after cryong about her being a Dem
Youre utterly retarded.
Posted on 6/17/25 at 9:27 am to roadGator
roadGator bad all the time.
Posted on 6/17/25 at 9:27 am to FLTech
quote:
MAGA is turning against Tulsi???
Any day now.
Its inevitable.
Posted on 6/17/25 at 9:28 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:No.
Isn't that like asking to prove a negative?
Come in. Inspect our facilities. No weaponization. No problem.
Page 2 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News