- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Verdict reached in Arbery trial
Posted on 11/24/21 at 1:22 pm to the808bass
Posted on 11/24/21 at 1:22 pm to the808bass
quote:
Even after the verdict, you’re here being wrong. Sit in your wrongness and think about what you’ve done.
I think stewing in his wrongness has only amplified his capability for being wrong. It's quite impressive. Never seen anyone so resolved to be a moron.
0
Posted on 11/24/21 at 1:22 pm to GhostOfFreedom
quote:
You morons really should go watch the videos that Officer Tatum posted back when this was a hot issue.
Y'all are stupid as hell and don't know jack. Do I think the vigilantes were wrong? Yes. Do I think they set out to murder the black man? No.
Your dumb take is not disagreeing with the degree of Murder the jury found.
Your dumb take is thinking that this story would not have been national news if it weren’t an election year.
The DA sat on the tape and these guys were going to walk until someone in that office had a sense of right and wrong and leaked the tape. It then came to light that she interfered with the investigation and was indicted herself.
Was the Duke lacrosse DA story only because it was an election year?
This post was edited on 11/24/21 at 1:23 pm
Posted on 11/24/21 at 1:23 pm to Azkiger
quote:
1.) It matters because it's one of the criteria needed to fulfill a legal citizen's arrest.
Except they on the record stated they didn't know about *it when they attempted the "citizens arrest."
He could have burned down the house (construction site) and if they didn't know about it they can't make a citizens arrest.
Without knowledge of a felony nothing else matters in that trail of hypotheticals.
And reaching for a gun that is pointed at you (aggravated assault without citizens arrest) while dumb isn't grounds for self defense.
This post was edited on 11/24/21 at 1:24 pm
Posted on 11/24/21 at 1:23 pm to Azkiger
quote:
That's how progressives knew to latch onto it.
Didn't you actually mean to type, "people who don't like murder"?
Posted on 11/24/21 at 1:23 pm to boosiebadazz
Glad they were found guilty.
Now let's take a close look at the DA's actions here.
Now let's take a close look at the DA's actions here.
Posted on 11/24/21 at 1:23 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
The defendants testified that they did not know a crime had been committed.
The citizen's arrest law doesn't demand you KNOW that a crime was committed.
Are you trolling me?
Posted on 11/24/21 at 1:24 pm to Azkiger
quote:
A guy is spotted looking into one of your neighbor's daughter's bedroom window several times over the course of a few months. You come home from work, and see the dude running down the street one house away from that neighbor's house.
You think it's outlandish to think that he was there trying to look into her room again? You need physical evidence?
Yes it would be outlandish to confront him with a gun just off of seeing him in the area again. That's why we have laws
This post was edited on 11/24/21 at 1:26 pm
Posted on 11/24/21 at 1:25 pm to GhostOfFreedom
quote:
drug pusher
Posted on 11/24/21 at 1:25 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
Defending the verdict is not the same as defending the victim
People never understand this
Posted on 11/24/21 at 1:26 pm to imjustafatkid
I can guarantee beyond a shadow of a doubt whatever way the media portrayed this case is a lot different from reality.
Posted on 11/24/21 at 1:26 pm to Azkiger
quote:
The citizen's arrest law doesn't demand you KNOW that a crime was committed.
A guess, which is what they testified to having, is not reasonable suspicion or immediate knowledge.
You’re so wrong on this in every way. It’s truly amazing to see.
“But they had a good argument!!!!!!!” Is the dumbest hill I’ve ever seen someone die on for a criminal verdict
This post was edited on 11/24/21 at 1:29 pm
Posted on 11/24/21 at 1:26 pm to Azkiger
quote:
The citizen's arrest law doesn't demand you KNOW that a crime was committed.
Are you trolling me?
It actually requires immediate knowledge of a crime.
Posted on 11/24/21 at 1:26 pm to pointman
quote:
I can guarantee beyond a shadow of a doubt whatever way the media portrayed this case is a lot different from reality.
But can you really when it’s all on tape?
Posted on 11/24/21 at 1:27 pm to GhostOfFreedom
quote:
Do I think they set out to murder the black man? No.
Maybe. Maybe not.
However if the intent was to scare or arrest why the guns? 3 guys against 1 couldn't scare him with a potential fist fight or make the arrest they claim?
Posted on 11/24/21 at 1:27 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:So you think he should still have possession of stuff he stole from previous robberies?
physical evidence, which they didn't have other than the absolute insistence that he was a robber. It's a poor argument going from the evidence on hand, because nothing stolen was found on his person
They have him on video sneaking around the house under construction and in other parts of the neighborhood. He was not a jogger. That's absurd.
Posted on 11/24/21 at 1:28 pm to GhostOfFreedom
quote:
As well as the hood rat, drug pusher with long rap sheet.
Arbery is a waste of humanity. Doesn’t mean you get to shoot people like that.
Posted on 11/24/21 at 1:28 pm to sgallo3
quote:
You think it's outlandish to think that he was there trying to look into her room again?
quote:
Yes
What an idiot...
Posted on 11/24/21 at 1:29 pm to Azkiger
quote:
You think it's outlandish to think that he was there trying to look into her room again? You need physical evidence?
You dumbshit. If the argument that there is a reasonable suspicion of a crime has occurred, having physical evidence is better than no physical evidence to reach the 51/49 threshold that you suggested was what all was needed for an acquittal. Again, do you understand how to construct an argument?
I didn't find that they had reasonable suspicion of a crime at all, because they said so plainly that they didn't. That makes the argument that they had reasonable suspicion even harder to make, because they didn't even make it themselves.
Posted on 11/24/21 at 1:30 pm to GhostOfFreedom
quote:
As well as the hood rat, drug pusher with long rap sheet.
He could have turned it all around to start selling pillows and saving our country from election fraud with lawsuits at the Supreme Court! This is America, anything is possible
This post was edited on 11/24/21 at 1:30 pm
Posted on 11/24/21 at 1:31 pm to crazy4lsu
Reasonable suspicion isn’t enough to effect a citizen’s arrest. The jury instructions were clear.
Page 9 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News