- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: WEF: “we can induce meat allergy by using ticks to stop the consumption of meat”
Posted on 2/8/26 at 9:54 am to moneyg
Posted on 2/8/26 at 9:54 am to moneyg
quote:
I’ve caught up on the thread a little and see now you are referencing some imaginary distinction between him being at the WEF saying this (the OP) and him being an official spokesman of the WEF?
Context matters. Just because you're downplaying it by making a mistake earlier doesn't invalidate the importance.
quote:
I’m not exactly sure what you are creating.
Showing how dishonesty primes people into silly behaviors
0
Posted on 2/8/26 at 9:54 am to TigerDoc
Fringe as they may seem, people would be right in their concern over hearing ideas like this in such an esteemed setting.
The left has a unique talent for bringing fringe ideas into the mainstream. Transitioning children, censoring political speech, and open borders to name a few…
The left has a unique talent for bringing fringe ideas into the mainstream. Transitioning children, censoring political speech, and open borders to name a few…
Posted on 2/8/26 at 9:54 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
At the WEF
Nob by the WEF
That’s what the WEF is. When I read the OP, I didn’t assume that this was an official position being pushed by the WEF. In fact, I don’t even know if that occurs.
Seems like you are the one who assumed something.
Posted on 2/8/26 at 9:55 am to Vacherie Saint
Often seems that way. Or is that just shtick and entertainment? Or something else?
I truly don't know what he believes or doesn't believe (and neither does he -- other than, "If I don't believe it, it needs context", or, "Meh, it's a "'CT'").
I truly don't know what he believes or doesn't believe (and neither does he -- other than, "If I don't believe it, it needs context", or, "Meh, it's a "'CT'").
Posted on 2/8/26 at 9:56 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
people would be right in their concern over hearing ideas like this in such an esteemed setting.
People who are ignorant of the WEF but believe irrational projections would say something like this.
People who understand what the WEF actually is laughs at you, though
Posted on 2/8/26 at 9:56 am to moneyg
quote:
Seems like you are the one who assumed something.
The conspiracy theorists and those promoting WEF-related conspiracies prove you wrong
Posted on 2/8/26 at 9:57 am to moneyg
What if Stephen Miller went to the WEF and hypothesized about putting ticks in tacos? Would the centrists still be here being all centristy?
This post was edited on 2/8/26 at 9:58 am
Posted on 2/8/26 at 9:58 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I'm assuming
This is where you lose most people here. For some reason you make assumptions on the side of the leftist.
quote:
Most of the time you have to pay to get in these positions to promote yourself.
You almost figured it out.
If the WEF has someone with these thoughts on stage repeatedly, over a significant period of time, I see that as a promotion of those thoughts. Most would agree that this is a very logical thought process.
Posted on 2/8/26 at 9:59 am to EphesianArmor
quote:
I truly don't know what he believes or doesn't believe (and neither does he -- other than, "If I don't believe it, it needs context", or, "Meh, it's a "'CT'").
How else would you respond to idiotic conspiracy theories?
Look, we can workshop this to educate you.
quote:
I believe EphesianArmor is a leader of a Baal-worshiping, child raping group who promotes disinformation on here to keep people off his group's scent.
How do you respond?
Posted on 2/8/26 at 9:59 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
What if Stephen Miller went to the WEF and hypothesized about putting ticks in tacos? Would the centrists still be here being all centristy?
Then he'd be criticized for saying dumb shite like he does often outside of the WEF setting, without need to reference the WEF, like this bioethicist.
Posted on 2/8/26 at 10:00 am to Screaming Viking
quote:
This is where you lose most people here. For some reason you make assumptions on the side of the leftist.
What does assuming he didn't pay for his WEF slot and had his school/org pay for it "Leftist" in any way?
Posted on 2/8/26 at 10:02 am to SlowFlowPro
He’d be criticized alright.
And you wouldn’t be here context policing the forum on his behalf. We all know it.
Now carry on with your foolishness.
And you wouldn’t be here context policing the forum on his behalf. We all know it.
Now carry on with your foolishness.
Posted on 2/8/26 at 10:04 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
He’d be criticized alright.
And you wouldn’t be here context policing the forum on his behalf.
When have I ever referenced the forum of Stephen Miller saying stupid stuff?
Like with this bioethicist, I criticize the output, not the setting.
The question is why so many people can't do that.
Posted on 2/8/26 at 10:04 am to Screaming Viking
Right. Hence my Stephen Miller comparison. He’ll just explain his one-sidedness away by criticizing the political leanings of the forum.
Posted on 2/8/26 at 10:04 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
He’ll just explain his one-sidedness away by criticizing the political leanings of the forum.
What? You're making less sense than Screaming Viking (and that's saying something)
Posted on 2/8/26 at 10:06 am to Fun Bunch
If this somehow happens to me, even by pure chance, every one of these frickers will pay dearly.
Posted on 2/8/26 at 10:14 am to Vacherie Saint
This is fair. I’m not saying people shouldn’t react strongly to the idea - it IS unsettling. Lumping all "fringe --> mainstream" pathways together makes it harder to tell which worries deserve sustained attention and which burn hot but can’t actually move. SFP is saying that in his own way.
I agree - venue matters and people notice patterns in how ideas travel from fringe to mainstream. That’s a reasonable instinct. Where I think things get fuzzy is that your examples aren’t all the same kind of transition. Some are expansions of individual choice or speech norms, some are border policy debates, and this idea would be a direct, coercive biomedical intervention. Those trigger very different veto points.
Maybe the useful question isn’t “has the left mainstreamed fringe ideas before?” but “what conditions have to be present for a fringe idea to cross from talk --> policy --> coercion?
In this case you’d need legal authority, medical buy-in, regulatory approval, enforcement mechanisms, and public tolerance - all at once. That’s a much higher bar than shifting norms around speech or identity.
I agree - venue matters and people notice patterns in how ideas travel from fringe to mainstream. That’s a reasonable instinct. Where I think things get fuzzy is that your examples aren’t all the same kind of transition. Some are expansions of individual choice or speech norms, some are border policy debates, and this idea would be a direct, coercive biomedical intervention. Those trigger very different veto points.
Maybe the useful question isn’t “has the left mainstreamed fringe ideas before?” but “what conditions have to be present for a fringe idea to cross from talk --> policy --> coercion?
In this case you’d need legal authority, medical buy-in, regulatory approval, enforcement mechanisms, and public tolerance - all at once. That’s a much higher bar than shifting norms around speech or identity.
Posted on 2/8/26 at 10:16 am to udtiger
Don’t worry bro. Fringe leftist ideas NEVER become ackshywull policy.
-bought to you by SPF and TigerDoc and sponsored by debanking, lockdowns, and reparations.
-bought to you by SPF and TigerDoc and sponsored by debanking, lockdowns, and reparations.
Posted on 2/8/26 at 10:16 am to TigerDoc
quote:
In this case you’d need legal authority, medical buy-in, regulatory approval, enforcement mechanisms, and public tolerance - all at once. That’s a much higher bar than shifting norms around speech or identity.
Or rogue scientist activists.
Posted on 2/8/26 at 10:17 am to Fun Bunch
Those people are vile, despicable creatures.
Page 5 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News