- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 1/23/24 at 9:33 am to oogabooga68
quote:
They are ACTIVELY SEXUALIZING CHILDREN.
We disagree on who "they" is.
Further, most of us sexualize children. My niece and her husband are raising their children in a very traditional way, and one that I think you and I would largely support. However, this includes grooming their son to be nearly allergic to the color pink. Why? We feed them stories of Cinderella and Snow White, which support traditional stereotypes of heterosexual relationships in which strong men take care of feeble women.
I happen to like that sort of grooming, and I think it results in a more healthy society, but I understand it is grooming - grooming them toward a sexualization that is productive for society.
Posted on 1/23/24 at 9:34 am to oogabooga68
quote:
And your hero demands that the Right surrender their values as a sign of "compromise"
Sorry, I don't know who my hero is supposed to be, nor do I understand your comment. Generally I am a supporter of traditional values.
Posted on 1/23/24 at 9:36 am to David_DJS
quote:
I'm still interested in the logic behind the assumption that there's a need for more government the denser a population gets.
I already mentioned waste and water supply. How many more examples would you like?
Posted on 1/23/24 at 9:36 am to riccoar
quote:
The truth is that as populations become denser they need more government, and ours - in fact, the whole world - is becoming denser.
No Republican would ever say this or deduce people so easily.
If North America was populated only by 100 people would they need stop signs?
This point is so obvious that it's shocking I have to keep explaining it.
I don't know what you meant by "deduce people" so I won't try.
Posted on 1/23/24 at 9:38 am to Penrod
quote:
We disagree on who "they" is.
Then you are a fool.
The Democrats aren't hiding it.
Quite the opposite in fact.
Posted on 1/23/24 at 9:38 am to Penrod
quote:
Further, most of us sexualize children. My niece and her husband are raising their children in a very traditional way, and one that I think you and I would largely support. However, this includes grooming their son to be nearly allergic to the color pink. Why? We feed them stories of Cinderella and Snow White, which support traditional stereotypes of heterosexual relationships in which strong men take care of feeble women.
I’ve noticed you conflate the definitions of words/ phrases. Here you use “sexualization” to define a “gender role”.
Earlier you said “government” when you clearly mean “structure/order”.
Perhaps this is why so many people here are having difficulty understanding your points.
Posted on 1/23/24 at 9:39 am to David_DJS
quote:
And I think there are more stop signs per capita in rural areas than urban.
So if North America was populated by only 100 people what is your intuitive guess as to the number of stop signs they would need?
Posted on 1/23/24 at 9:40 am to Penrod
quote:
Further, most of us sexualize children. My niece and her husband are raising their children in a very traditional way, and one that I think you and I would largely support. However, this includes grooming their son to be nearly allergic to the color pink. Why? We feed them stories of Cinderella and Snow White, which support traditional stereotypes of heterosexual relationships in which strong men take care of feeble women.
Ok, thanks for finally letting us know that OP was a troll post and you aren't a serious poster.
If you equate what the Left is doing with those on the Right raising normal children within the confines of traditional sex/gender roles, then you are a moron.
Posted on 1/23/24 at 9:40 am to Flats
quote:
I mean you don't have to look beyond the basics like water and waste to understand that as the population density grows the need for a collective solution grows with it. You aren't putting an apartment building on a well and a septic tank.
O.k.
Of course the need for infrastructure increases and I'm not sure how to express that I wasn't implying that there would be no need for any increased government at all, only that—like just about everything that poster posted—the relative truth of the statement depends a whole lot on what was meant by the statement. For example, infrastructure needs obviously increase, does that mean we need more federal building/materials/environmental regulations? I doubt it. I'll bet we already have more than enough. What do you think?
I would have thought my last post on the subject (complete with a mea culpa on how I expressed it) would have cleared that up, but here we are.
So what else would you like for me to say? So that we can move past this?
Posted on 1/23/24 at 9:41 am to Penrod
quote:
So if North America was populated by only 100 people what is your intuitive guess as to the number of stop signs they would need?
I live in a private community of over 1000 homes and we didn’t need the government to put up even 1 stop sign. What is it about a stop sign that requires a government?
Posted on 1/23/24 at 9:42 am to oogabooga68
quote:
No, your unbiased "expert" is a fool.
Biden is actively promoting the destruction of the country, that is inarguable.
First, I cited no unbiased expert; that is your invention.
Second, that Biden is actively promoting the destruction of America is certainly arguable. That is a clown statement on the order of the left wing loons saying that Trump's election would mean the end of American Democracy.
Posted on 1/23/24 at 9:42 am to Robin Masters
quote:
I’ve noticed you conflate the definitions of words/ phrases. Here you use “sexualization” to define a “gender role”.
Yes.
This moron wants you to believe that Democrat pushing pornography on school kids is exactly the same as not wanting your sons to play with Barbie dolls.
This was a troll post from the beginning or OP is legit braindead.
Posted on 1/23/24 at 9:43 am to Flats
quote:
I already mentioned waste and water supply. How many more examples would you like?
100 towns of 2,500 people spread out need 100 water treatment plants.
250,000 people in a single city (like mine) has 2 water treatment plants.
Which involves more government?
Posted on 1/23/24 at 9:43 am to Penrod
quote:
Second, that Biden is actively promoting the destruction of America is certainly arguable.
Hahaha....ok idiot, I'll play along.
So you think a WIDE OPEN SOUTHERN BORDER inviting MILLIONS OF PEOPLE to illegally enter, then giving them all welfare whilst pushing to give them voting rights isn't promoting the destruction of the country?
Go ahead, entertain us, troll....
Posted on 1/23/24 at 9:46 am to Penrod
quote:
Second, that Biden is actively promoting the destruction of America is certainly arguable. That is a clown statement on the order of the left wing loons saying that Trump's election would mean the end of American Democracy.
In light of their recent fight to keep open illegal border crossings in Texas I’m afraid there is not other explanation. They are actively facilitating an invasion of illegal aliens to the detriment of American citizens. They have lost any possible plausible deniability.
Posted on 1/23/24 at 9:46 am to David_DJS
quote:
100 towns of 2,500 people spread out need 100 water treatment plants.
No, they don't. They can get by on wells and septic. An apartment complex cannot do that.
Posted on 1/23/24 at 9:46 am to Penrod
quote:
Penrod
Listening to catturd and he put it perfectly.
When someone on the left annoys him, he mutes them. When he annoys someone on the left, they try to murder him.
Huge disconnect here.
This post was edited on 1/23/24 at 9:47 am
Posted on 1/23/24 at 9:47 am to Penrod
It means you clearly feel superior to others, especially Republicans.
Nobody is talking about stop signs and traffic lights. We are talking about over regululating everything in everyone's lives.
The reason most people pay folks to do their taxes is because the government employs an army of people who have their own rules. Their conclusions about your situation are never wrong.
The fact that I have to have a super solid certified Driver's License to prove who I am in order to fly domestically while our government let's people into our country without any verification, health screening, or checks against terror watch list.
Somehow that is supposed to make sense and be smart.
Nobody is talking about stop signs and traffic lights. We are talking about over regululating everything in everyone's lives.
The reason most people pay folks to do their taxes is because the government employs an army of people who have their own rules. Their conclusions about your situation are never wrong.
The fact that I have to have a super solid certified Driver's License to prove who I am in order to fly domestically while our government let's people into our country without any verification, health screening, or checks against terror watch list.
Somehow that is supposed to make sense and be smart.
Posted on 1/23/24 at 9:47 am to Penrod
quote:The Democrat platform is the definition of Evil.
They are all evil
Child sacrifice. Grooming. Homosexual and unnatural immorality. Taxation. Trans. Pronouns. Woman as men, men as women.
Everything evil and immoral is packed into that platform.
History will not be kind to your ilk!
This post was edited on 1/23/24 at 9:48 am
Page 5 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News