- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
247 Overall Rankings (Transfer + HS)
Posted on 1/16/26 at 4:43 pm
Posted on 1/16/26 at 4:43 pm
#6
Incredible job by Lane. From 12 to 6 and we’re not done yet
Incredible job by Lane. From 12 to 6 and we’re not done yet
This post was edited on 1/16/26 at 4:45 pm
10
Posted on 1/16/26 at 4:44 pm to SCLSUMuddogs
Including outbound players based upon their incoming ratings is a dumb methodology. They played and they were not great.
Posted on 1/16/26 at 4:46 pm to SCLSUMuddogs
Posted on 1/16/26 at 4:47 pm to Buds4
quote:
Including outbound players based upon their incoming ratings is a dumb methodology. They played and they were not great
Could be wrong, but I think on3 is the only one that implements players leaving into their rankings
Posted on 1/16/26 at 4:47 pm to Buds4
That’s On3. We’re #1 in 247’s transfer rankings. The overall is a collective ranking that combines transfers and traditional recruiting
Posted on 1/16/26 at 4:48 pm to SCLSUMuddogs
I'll call that a tie for 5th place.
Seaton pushes us to 4. Anything beyond that of any substance and we will be pushing for the #1 overall class, which would be insane.
Seaton pushes us to 4. Anything beyond that of any substance and we will be pushing for the #1 overall class, which would be insane.
This post was edited on 1/16/26 at 4:49 pm
Posted on 1/16/26 at 4:49 pm to SCLSUMuddogs
A literal inch away from a top 5 class ranking.
Posted on 1/16/26 at 4:49 pm to Jugular Joe
Thats without 3 transfers still not accounted for in their system
Posted on 1/16/26 at 5:00 pm to Buds4
I think included what transfers out is a good way of showing if you got better, but a lot of the guys that transferred out got ranked highly solely on them having a high HS or just getting the LSU boost. So I don’t agree with On3s actual system, just their evaluation
Posted on 1/16/26 at 5:03 pm to SCLSUMuddogs
Playoffs or bust year 1
Posted on 1/16/26 at 5:04 pm to Glizzy_gang
quote:
lot of the guys that transferred out got ranked highly solely on them having a high HS or just getting the LSU boost.
THIS! complete crap. Curne maybe deserved his rating but we ditched some dead star-weight.
Posted on 1/16/26 at 5:06 pm to SCLSUMuddogs
More than half of the team will be new to this team
Posted on 1/16/26 at 5:10 pm to Tiger987
Anymore I put more stock in what you do in the portal. HS talent is green and unproven relative to portal guys.
Posted on 1/16/26 at 5:11 pm to SCLSUMuddogs
I spy lil bro at 13 lol
Posted on 1/16/26 at 5:13 pm to Stew2581
Our high school class was #12 but our average player rating was #1. Only 14 players in the class.
Posted on 1/16/26 at 5:19 pm to More beer please
quote:
Thats without 3 transfers still not accounted for in their system
The JUCO transfer is listed under the current recruit section (2026 Recruits) and not the transfer section of 247 and On3 rankings (see link below). So only 2 transfers not accounted for in the rankings. However, 247 does not have the 2026 CB from Florida that recently committed to LSU.
Jones is listed under "Hard Commits"
247 Link to 2026 Recruits
This post was edited on 1/16/26 at 5:20 pm
Posted on 1/16/26 at 5:20 pm to SCLSUMuddogs
@ R-Kansas The most total commits in the SEC with 55 players, but still finished ranked last
Posted on 1/16/26 at 5:48 pm to Buds4
quote:
Including outbound players based upon their incoming ratings is a dumb methodology. They played and they were not great.
I disagree.
Posted on 1/16/26 at 5:53 pm to SCLSUMuddogs
Amazing job
Posted on 1/16/26 at 6:27 pm to Glizzy_gang
quote:
I think included what transfers out is a good way of showing if you got better, but a lot of the guys that transferred out got ranked highly solely on them having a high HS or just getting the LSU boost. So I don’t agree with On3s actual system, just their evaluation
Are we sure that guys with HS ratings ONLY count in the transfer portal overall points? I'm too lazy to do the math but the simple check on that is we know the overall average per player so either that average counts HS + T ratings or just T ratings. Obviously, the average won't be the same determined by which way they count towards that average.
Page 1 of 2
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News