- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
I like how Matt Walsh is coming around.
Posted on 3/3/26 at 7:44 pm
Posted on 3/3/26 at 7:44 pm
Posted on 3/3/26 at 7:46 pm to GumboPot
He'll change his tune as soon as his boss has the talk with him.


Posted on 3/3/26 at 7:50 pm to BobBoucher
quote:
That’s really a question?
Yes.
ETA: if this is the question you are referring to, "If we're going to reward them, then will we also reward your America First base?"
This post was edited on 3/3/26 at 7:52 pm
Posted on 3/3/26 at 8:16 pm to GumboPot
Yup. We haven’t gotten a border wall or the mass deportations we voted for, but we’ve gotten a new war, which absolutely nobody voted for.
This admin has been a failure.
This admin has been a failure.
Posted on 3/3/26 at 8:23 pm to GumboPot
In my long life, besides retaliating against the Taliban, this is the biggest no-brainer military move. I mean, it's completely obvious and 50 years in the making and the perfect time to punish the biggest destabilizing force in the world that has killed untold Americans. I think you ol boys are overthinking this by a factor of 100.
Posted on 3/3/26 at 8:24 pm to GumboPot
I’m noticing Gumbo is back to being a weak faggedy arse.
Posted on 3/3/26 at 8:25 pm to GumboPot
quote:
asks why it is "impractical" to deport millions of illegals but not impractical to launch a war thousands of miles from home.
Because you are expected to kill those opposing you at war, but not to do the same to citizens protesting your immigration enforcement. Thats kinda a huge sticking point to it being "practical"
All I get from this, is that Matt Walsh is not a serious human being
Posted on 3/3/26 at 8:26 pm to Lsupimp
quote:
In my long life, besides retaliating against the Taliban, this is the biggest no-brainer military move. I mean, it's completely obvious and 50 years in the making and the perfect time to punish the biggest destabilizing force in the world that has killed untold Americans. I think you ol boys are overthinking this by a factor of 100.
Daddy Israel agrees.
Posted on 3/3/26 at 8:28 pm to the808bass
I’m shocked at all the open border proponents we have on PT. I guess Trump knows his voters a lot better than I do.
Posted on 3/3/26 at 8:29 pm to GumboPot
Hurr durr.
Hurr durr.
I think you dumb so I open border.
frick off, idiot.
Hurr durr.
I think you dumb so I open border.
frick off, idiot.
Posted on 3/3/26 at 8:43 pm to Murph4HOF
quote:
He'll change his tune as soon as his boss has the talk with him.
I have said for a few months now that I think Shapiro will have run off Walsh and Knowles before 2026 is out.
Posted on 3/3/26 at 8:45 pm to Lsupimp
quote:
In my long life, besides retaliating against the Taliban, this is the biggest no-brainer military move.
This is the correct answer.
Posted on 3/3/26 at 8:47 pm to Murph4HOF
quote:
He'll change his tune as soon as his boss has the talk with him.
What did he say that Shapiro would disagree with?
Posted on 3/3/26 at 8:50 pm to ipodking
quote:
Daddy Israel agrees.
It’s like they handed out a Simpleton’s guide to the Middle East and you got stuck on the first paragraph. DO better. Think.
Posted on 3/3/26 at 8:51 pm to GumboPot
quote:
Matt Walsh
So when you move in the direction of Dave Smith and Tucker, are you required to talk to your audience like they have an IQ under 50?
Popular
Back to top


16














