- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Why Justice Department lawyers aren't doing very well in the courts these days
Posted on 4/3/26 at 3:21 pm
Posted on 4/3/26 at 3:21 pm
"Justice Department lawyers under Ms. Bondi often behaved in shockingly unethical ways. For decades, Federal judges have looked at assistant U.S. attorneys and other Justice Department lawyers as something more than mere combatants. For good reason, judges assumed that Federal lawyers told them the truth about the facts and the law of their cases. But based on the frequently appalling conduct — for instance, lying, gaslighting, hiding facts and evidence — of Justice Department lawyers in the Bondi era, many judges are no longer giving government lawyers the benefit of the doubt. Nor should they."
Posted on 4/3/26 at 3:24 pm to ScotReiver
You are either really dumb or you think we all are. Just pathetic.
Posted on 4/3/26 at 3:25 pm to ScotReiver
Where is this from? The DOJ is a leftist organization. It would take a decade to switch it. So who is this aimed at? The few hundred new ones, or is it more lawfare drivel?
Posted on 4/3/26 at 3:26 pm to ScotReiver
Links are oh so very hard to put in a thread!
Posted on 4/3/26 at 3:28 pm to ScotReiver
LOLOLOL
That is classic Saul Alinsky writing and reporting, right there.
That is classic Saul Alinsky writing and reporting, right there.
Posted on 4/3/26 at 3:30 pm to ScotReiver
Stfu you know nothing about the subject
Reddit troll 20 posts
Reddit troll 20 posts
This post was edited on 4/3/26 at 3:32 pm
Posted on 4/3/26 at 3:34 pm to Wally Sparks
Holy smokes. No wonder OP didn't link it
It's Jeffrey toobin in the NYT. Lol.......
a leftist writes for leftists. Surprise!
It's Jeffrey toobin in the NYT. Lol.......
a leftist writes for leftists. Surprise!
Posted on 4/3/26 at 3:37 pm to ScotReiver
Hey troll , have you ever heard about the Biden DOJ or the Obama DOJ ? Those ones that lied to judges about fisa warrants? Or those DOJ days that put together fake cases against Trump ?
Posted on 4/3/26 at 3:38 pm to Bronco11
Toobin the CNN Democrat Zoom Meeting Masturbator?
Posted on 4/3/26 at 3:38 pm to SloaneRanger
Um some of what he is saying is true. Look at Eric Adams case.
Posted on 4/3/26 at 3:39 pm to ScotReiver
quote:
many judges are no longer giving government lawyers the benefit of the doubt.
Yeah, no way could it be the anti-Trump activist judges carrying water for the DNC.
Posted on 4/3/26 at 3:40 pm to ScotReiver
another democrates slander
Posted on 4/3/26 at 3:48 pm to ScotReiver
quote:
judges assumed that Federal lawyers told them the truth about the facts and the law of their cases. But based on the frequently appalling conduct — for instance, lying, gaslighting, hiding facts and evidence — of Justice Department lawyers in the Bondi era

Posted on 4/3/26 at 3:49 pm to ScotReiver
Impotent and retarded is no way to go through life, man.
Posted on 4/3/26 at 3:50 pm to ScotReiver
You know adding “” around things you made up doesn’t make them true
Aww shite throwaway account got me
Aww shite throwaway account got me
This post was edited on 4/3/26 at 3:52 pm
Posted on 4/3/26 at 3:56 pm to NC_Tigah
How dare you disparage SFPs idol. 
Posted on 4/3/26 at 4:06 pm to ScotReiver
quote:
frequently appalling conduct — for instance, lying, gaslighting, hiding facts and evidence
If it was true at all, the dems would be filing a job description violation!!!
Popular
Back to top


20








