Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us GOP Poll Watchers now allowed in Pennsylvania | Page 2 | Election 2024
Started By
Message

re: GOP Poll Watchers now allowed in Pennsylvania

Posted on 11/5/24 at 7:05 am to
Posted by The Maj
Member since Sep 2016
30551 posts
Posted on 11/5/24 at 7:05 am to
How many boxes of ballots were dumped before they were allowed in to observe?
Posted by MMauler
Primary This RINO Traitor
Member since Jun 2013
24230 posts
Posted on 11/5/24 at 7:19 am to
I’m sure that Republican poll watchers have been told to count every motherf*cker who walks through those doors. So if they have thousands of more votes than people who actually voted, lawsuits will be filed.
This post was edited on 11/5/24 at 7:43 am
Posted by PaperTiger
Ruston, LA
Member since Feb 2015
26456 posts
Posted on 11/5/24 at 7:21 am to
This shite has gotten out of control. It gives a terrible perception and then they want to bitch when people say it wasnt fair.
Posted by 1putt
Member since Sep 2024
993 posts
Posted on 11/5/24 at 7:22 am to
I’m concerned about what came in the back door.
Posted by MMauler
Primary This RINO Traitor
Member since Jun 2013
24230 posts
Posted on 11/5/24 at 7:25 am to
quote:

Why do these cheaters think they’ll get away with this crap this time!?


Because John "The F*ckhead Never-Trump Traitor" Roberts made sure that nothing happened to them last time. You couldn’t have been more fricking obvious with the massive fricking voter fraud in 2020. But no lawsuit was allowed to get past dismissal on bullshite procedure grounds.

Democrats have been going around for the last 3+ years saying that there were over 50 cases and they all ruled that there was absolutely no evidence of voter fraud. That was a complete fricking lie. Not one court allowed for discovery, depositions, an investigation, or any evidence to be submitted. They were all dismissed on bullsh!t procedural grounds, mainly lack of standing. Every f*cking citizen in this country should’ve had standing to challenge an obvious fricking fraudulent Presidential election.
This post was edited on 11/5/24 at 7:42 am
Posted by scottydoesntknow
Member since Nov 2023
10870 posts
Posted on 11/5/24 at 7:26 am to
LaCriCri and Karen will have to be extra sneaky this year
Posted by SlidellCajun
Slidell la
Member since May 2019
16298 posts
Posted on 11/5/24 at 7:48 am to
quote:

That was a complete fricking lie. Not one court allowed for discovery, depositions, an investigation, or any evidence to be submitted. They were all dismissed on bullsh!t procedural grounds, mainly lack of standing. Every f*cking citizen in this country should’ve had standing to challenge an obvious fricking fraudulent Presidential election


How do you know these things are lies?
Posted by John Barron
The Mar-a-Lago Club
Member since Sep 2024
17101 posts
Posted on 11/5/24 at 7:50 am to
Posted by tiger91
In my own little world
Member since Nov 2005
40150 posts
Posted on 11/5/24 at 7:53 am to
Is this where they were kicked out last week?? Someone said “it was the law”.

Posted by John Barron
The Mar-a-Lago Club
Member since Sep 2024
17101 posts
Posted on 11/5/24 at 7:55 am to
I think that was Fulton County Georgia
Posted by MMauler
Primary This RINO Traitor
Member since Jun 2013
24230 posts
Posted on 11/5/24 at 8:12 am to
quote:

How do you know these things are lies?


I’ve actually read some of the cases. A bunch of known RINO Never-Trump lawyers put out this “White Paper“ looking document that resembled a Law Review Article. The point was to show that Trump’s claim of voter fraud was rejected by every court it came before. The only problem was that the three cases they cited for their proposition never actually looked at any evidence or allowed for any discovery. These cases were, in fact, decided on procedural grounds, i.e., lack of standing. Of course, the law review looking article didn’t mention this. You actually had to go read those cases to figure it out. The obviously politicized judges in those cases added some dicta that had nothing to do with the ultimate holding. These judges tried to make it sound like they had looked at some “evidence," but admitted that they never allowed for any sort of discovery or investigation. And it was the dicta that these known Never Trumpers quoted and relied on in their fraudulent paper to make it seem like there was an actual full-blown trial with discovery and depositions.

ETA: I believe a Democrat think tank paid these Never Trumper‘s to put this article out. I got it from an acquaintance who is about as far left of an ignorant fricking insane whackjob as you'll ever come across. It was passed around in those circles as some sort of proof that the election was the “fairest and most secure“ election in history. The argument was that since this article was authored by (Lord knows who actually wrote it) “Republicans" no one could question it.
This post was edited on 11/5/24 at 8:19 am
Posted by AubieinNC2009
Mountain NC
Member since Dec 2018
7186 posts
Posted on 11/5/24 at 8:20 am to
Lara said they have 500 lawyers in each state just waiting to sue
Posted by SlidellCajun
Slidell la
Member since May 2019
16298 posts
Posted on 11/5/24 at 9:00 am to
quote:

These judges tried to make it sound like they had looked at some “evidence," but admitted that they never allowed for any sort of discovery or investigation


And trump couldn’t escalate to a higher court?
Posted by rattlebucket
SELA
Member since Feb 2009
12713 posts
Posted on 11/5/24 at 9:45 am to
We ok. The Amish got us

Also the sheer difference v 2020 in communication on X is awesome
Posted by JiminyCricket
Member since Jun 2017
6195 posts
Posted on 11/5/24 at 9:46 am to
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram