- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Durham is doubtful
Posted on 9/26/25 at 5:35 pm to Sexydexy15
Posted on 9/26/25 at 5:35 pm to Sexydexy15
Berry
Posted on 9/26/25 at 5:36 pm to mdomingue
Hopefully Johnson is up to speed in the pass pro department because that’s an area where Durham is really good. I think he’s done well up to this point. Excited to see Berry a little more.
Posted on 9/26/25 at 5:36 pm to mdomingue
Wait a sec! Why did you have to bring out the stats? That tells a completely different story than what many here want to believe. Why would you do that Dom?!
Posted on 9/26/25 at 5:38 pm to saint tiger225
quote:
Wait a sec! Why did you have to bring out the stats? That tells a completely different story than what many here want to believe. Why would you do that Dom?!
I mean, you’re melting because people aren’t too bothered losing a guy averaging 4 yards per carry.
Durham is a fine back, but he’s far from irreplaceable.
This post was edited on 9/26/25 at 5:39 pm
Posted on 9/26/25 at 5:39 pm to Morpheus
quote:
Durham minus 2-3 runs hasn’t been that much of an impact.
If we're gonna play that game, let's play it across the board.
Durham, minus his best run, is averaging 3.18 per carry.
Berry, minus his best run, is averaging 3.14 per carry.
JJ, minus his best run, is averaging 2.4 per carry.
KJ, minus his best run, is averaging 0 per carry
Posted on 9/26/25 at 5:39 pm to Sexydexy15
Let's not forget about Zavion going in motion and lining up in the backfield. That has been a productive play so far this season. So that gives us four options if Durham is out.
Posted on 9/26/25 at 5:40 pm to mdomingue
quote:
If we're gonna play that game, let's play it across the board
So losing a back from a pile of not great backs.
Again, this isn’t a massive loss that buries the offense. It’s just next man up with this group.
Posted on 9/26/25 at 5:41 pm to Jake009
His vision has left something to be desired but the offensive line has been pure trash
Posted on 9/26/25 at 5:45 pm to mdomingue
Ok , fair enough, but those two being the focus this week and not splitting time with Durham should be an indicator of what the exact problem is.
Is it the line really, or is it the person missing the holes and opportunities to make a play.
We will find out.
Is it the line really, or is it the person missing the holes and opportunities to make a play.
We will find out.
Posted on 9/26/25 at 5:48 pm to Morpheus
quote:
Is it the line really, or is it the person missing the holes and opportunities to make a play.
Both can be true.
Posted on 9/26/25 at 5:51 pm to S
quote:
Hopefully Johnson is up to speed in the pass pro department because that’s an area where Durham is really good. I think he’s done well up to this point. Excited to see Berry a little more.
He's had a lot of snaps, and he has done very well at that. I've watched him for that and he's made some excellent blocks in both pass pro and on screens and sweeps. Not sure if he is as good as Durham, but he is close and better than Berry or Jackson, though Jackson has improved considerably from last season.
That is something that Emery was excellent at. I sure wish he had stayed, though I am not sure if he is fully recovered yet. He has no carries for UTSA
Posted on 9/26/25 at 5:52 pm to saint tiger225
quote:
Why would you do that Dom?!
Posted on 9/26/25 at 5:55 pm to Jake009
quote:
I actually don’t think this is as big of a deal as the media makes it out to be.
We need bodies at running back. We're down to two healthy full-time running backs, one is a true freshman
Posted on 9/26/25 at 5:55 pm to Shiftyplus1
quote:
Johnson just looks better.
In what aspect? Running against Southeastern?
Posted on 9/26/25 at 6:01 pm to LSUdude247
quote:
In what aspect? Running against Southeastern?
Exactly
I can't believe people are shitting on Durham for his play against some damn good defenses and trying to praise JJ for his play against SELA.
You can't make this type of stupidity up.
Posted on 9/26/25 at 6:03 pm to Sexydexy15
His pass blocking ability will be missed..Davis will need help all game
Posted on 9/26/25 at 6:09 pm to RB10
quote:
45% of the yards. 41% of the carries. 4.15 YPC. 2 total TDs
While that may be true, it’s skewed by 2 outliers. The first play of the year that he broke for 25 yards or so and the last run vs Florida.
Other than those 2 he’s been very pedestrian and doesn’t seem to have the same speed we saw before he was hurt last season.
I like what JJ has done and if Berry can learn pass protection, he’s the real future at RB
And to be clear, it’s great if he can go. But think we’re better off with a 100% JJ and Berry than a 70-80%Durham. Especially if he doesn’t have the speed burst that made him such a high level recruit.
This post was edited on 9/26/25 at 6:13 pm
Posted on 9/26/25 at 6:19 pm to Jake009
Have yall seen Berry or Johnson pass blocking? This is a big loss to the passing game esp given our OL.
Posted on 9/26/25 at 6:25 pm to Colonel Angus
Agreed..we’ll likely see Kaleb Jackson more for this very reason
Posted on 9/26/25 at 6:39 pm to RB10
quote:
So losing a back from a pile of not great backs.
It may also not be solely on the backs.
quote:
Again, this isn’t a massive loss that buries the offense.
I think most of us agree on that. The biggest loss is his pass pro, though JJ has also done well; Jackson and Berry are spotty. It was nice having two in the rotation who could block well. I wish I could recall where to get a snap count per player because I think JJ has been in there more than his rush total indicates.
Popular
Back to top


1







