Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Lease vehicle or buy | Page 2 | Money Talk
Started By
Message

re: Lease vehicle or buy

Posted on 10/26/09 at 9:27 am to
Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
92517 posts
Posted on 10/26/09 at 9:27 am to
Buy a $5k - $10k used car and pay it off.

Drive for 10 years.

Repeat.

DO NOT BUY NEW.
Posted by seawolf06
NH
Member since Oct 2007
8159 posts
Posted on 10/26/09 at 9:58 am to
It's funny that all the people saying that leasing is a bad deal will complain when they get screwed on a trade in.

In order for leasing to be a good deal, it has to fit your lifestyle and make sense. The details have already been explained, so it just depends on what your plans are for the next few years. Do you want to get a new vehicle every few years? If so, do you want the hassle of trading it or selling it?

There are several lease vs buy calculators on the web.
Posted by jjbodean1970
Huntington, WV
Member since Mar 2006
6493 posts
Posted on 10/26/09 at 12:04 pm to
leasing is def not for everybody, but its the way to go for others. if youre afraid of getting screwed, read your contract ahead of time and know what acceptable wear and tear is from the leasing company ahead of time, and adhere to it.

J Paul Getty said, "If it appreciated buy it, if it depreciates lease it!"
Posted by yudaman
Central Texas
Member since Aug 2005
423 posts
Posted on 10/26/09 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

Buy a $5k - $10k used car and pay it off.

Drive for 10 years.

Repeat.

DO NOT BUY NEW.


This
Posted by TulaneUVA
Member since Jun 2005
26209 posts
Posted on 10/26/09 at 1:15 pm to
quote:

quote:

Buy a $5k - $10k used car and pay it off.

Drive for 10 years.

Repeat.

DO NOT BUY NEW.


This


This will get you no 'tang.
Posted by Will Cover
Davidson, NC
Member since Mar 2007
40085 posts
Posted on 10/26/09 at 2:01 pm to
quote:

This will get you no 'tang.


But couldn't one save enough to at least rent 'tang for an hour?
Posted by TulaneUVA
Member since Jun 2005
26209 posts
Posted on 10/26/09 at 2:09 pm to
Option 1: Lease bangin' car = Tigerland tang for every Friday/Saturday night...anyone one could do this with a BMW 337 assuming you're not SFP-like.

Option 2: 10 year old car. To get equal amount (not even considering quality) of tang, you would need enough money to cover 'rentage' for 52 weekends a year. And that's with the additional fear of getting a transgendered, undercover cop like in Southpark.
Posted by JWS3
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2008
2502 posts
Posted on 10/26/09 at 9:26 pm to
quote:

This will get you no 'tang.


Never found any that was worth the long term cost of a new car, and I have been around a long time.
Posted by TulaneUVA
Member since Jun 2005
26209 posts
Posted on 10/26/09 at 11:15 pm to
quote:

Never found any that was worth the long term cost of a new car, and I have been around a long time.


I was being somewhat facetious, and I'm sure you picked up on that as well...but the basis of the statement is that some people do in fact care about what they drive. Not just in appearance, what the public perception of the vehicle is, and the possibly false reality of increased social status...but more so with having a fun drive (~300 hp will do that) and high quality/luxury. Who doesn't like nice toys?

Everyone indulges in their purchases in one form or another. Some choose electronics or clothing are their medium. Others choose cars.
Posted by Lachendorf
TX
Member since Mar 2009
484 posts
Posted on 10/27/09 at 12:54 pm to
The first thing my undergraduate accounting teacher told us my freshman year was do not lease a car. Talked to whole first day about that. It has stuck with me ever since.
Posted by MikeBRLA
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2005
17163 posts
Posted on 10/27/09 at 1:15 pm to
quote:

The first thing my undergraduate accounting teacher told us my freshman year was do not lease a car. Talked to whole first day about that. It has stuck with me ever since.


In that case your undergraduate accounting teacher wasn't a very good business person (thus the reason they teach accounting instead of running a business). Making a blanket "it's always bad to do this or that" statement regardless of looking at the numbers is silly.

Example, if someone offers to lease you a $50,000 car for $10 a month for 36 months would it still be a bad deal? Of course not. As with any business deal, always look at the numbers.

Posted by kfizzle85
Member since Dec 2005
22022 posts
Posted on 10/27/09 at 1:24 pm to
They were probably trying to make it simple. We're talking about 17-18 y/o audience here.
Posted by TheHiddenFlask
The Welsh red light district
Member since Jul 2008
18384 posts
Posted on 10/27/09 at 1:47 pm to
quote:


In that case your undergraduate accounting teacher wasn't a very good business person (thus the reason they teach accounting instead of running a business). Making a blanket "it's always bad to do this or that" statement regardless of looking at the numbers is silly.

Example, if someone offers to lease you a $50,000 car for $10 a month for 36 months would it still be a bad deal? Of course not. As with any business deal, always look at the numbers.


I think what the teacher meant was "in the real world, you should never do it", and a smartass comment like that would have got you kicked out of class. With that said, you are right about giving blanket statements.

The reason accountants would say to never lease a car is because it counters the accounting mindset of conservativism. How many accountants do you know that failed to plan appropriately for retirement?

Leasing is "appropriate" for those who would live an overly lavish lifestyle (for their actual income) any way. TulaneUVA really gets it, he just says "frick it, I deserve this for all of my hard work" which is just fine, as long as he has a long term plan.
Posted by kfizzle85
Member since Dec 2005
22022 posts
Posted on 10/27/09 at 2:02 pm to
ETA: This is a stupid tangent, so I'll just shut up.
This post was edited on 10/27/09 at 2:06 pm
Posted by LSUtoOmaha
Nashville
Member since Apr 2004
26726 posts
Posted on 10/27/09 at 2:06 pm to
quote:

I heard one point explained that made a lot of sense that a car is an asset, a pretty expensive one, that depreciates greatly, and quickly, in most cases. Therefore, it's wiser to lease, and that way you are not stuck with a depreciated asset down the line.


This is very very flawed logic. If you own a car, it is a depreciating asset, but an asset nonetheless. If you lease a car, it is a LIABILITY, as you always have a notes payable.
Posted by LSUtoOmaha
Nashville
Member since Apr 2004
26726 posts
Posted on 10/27/09 at 2:08 pm to
quote:

J Paul Getty said, "If it appreciated buy it, if it depreciates lease it!"


Am I the only person who sees what is so absurdly wrong about this logic?
Posted by bomber77
Member since Aug 2008
14783 posts
Posted on 10/28/09 at 9:02 am to
quote:

Buy a $5k - $10k used car and pay it off.

Drive for 10 years.

Repeat.

DO NOT BUY NEW.


Not everyone wants to drive a 5000 car for 10 fricking years. If you really want to save some depreciation why dont you buy used clothes? NEVER BUY NEW CLOTHES! You can go to a thrift store and pick up some used pants for about a dollar. Buy them and wear them for 10 years.
Posted by AbsolutTiger
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2006
4796 posts
Posted on 10/28/09 at 9:33 am to
Someone has to buy a new car for these cheapskates to be able to get their $5,000 car, so I don't mind doing it.

I hope they have fun fixing all the shite that broke during the 100k that I had it.

Back to the point of this thread, I personally purchase my vehicles, but I always will have a car note. Once one is paid for its time for a new one, so I cant throw stones at people who lease, they're in the same boat with me.
Posted by Purple Forever
Someplace Special on the Bayou
Member since Aug 2008
829 posts
Posted on 10/29/09 at 12:12 pm to
Ive leased my wife's last 2 vehicles.
Makes much more sense for me.
Reasons:
After decades of experience in the auto business, it's a terrible investment of money. Anyone who insists it's absolutely better to own, has never looked at the numbers that there new vehicle drops in value by double digit percentage the moment you drive if off the lot. Nwo that's insane.
I keep my wife in a new vehicle, with warranty, every three years. Her normal driving is less than 10K so we never come close to the mileage limits.
Im paying for the amount of the car I use, and never have repair expenses out of pocket.
The only alternative to leasing wold be to keep the car until it died, maybe 10 or 15 years down the road. That would be a better use of money than leasing.
As I mentioned, I keep my wife in a leased vehicle and would never keep her driving a car that was likely to break down.
To each his own, Im a fan of leasing and it has worked out very well for us. We take good care of the cars we lease so we dont have fees imposed on us when we turn it in. Reasonable wear and tear are exempt.
Posted by notiger1997
Metairie
Member since May 2009
61614 posts
Posted on 10/29/09 at 12:22 pm to
We leased once and will never do it again. I like buying a 2 or 3 year old car and keeping it for until it is around 8 or 9 years and has 100K or so miles on it.

I can pay a $350 per month lease payment and get nothing when I am done, or I can pay a $350 a month car note and get to drive it for 5 or 6 years after paying it off.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram