Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Proposal pending to let NFL use replay for some penalties | More Sports
Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Proposal pending to let NFL use replay for some penalties

Posted on 3/28/25 at 1:38 pm
Posted by Diseasefreeforall
Member since Oct 2012
7306 posts
Posted on 3/28/25 at 1:38 pm
Hits to defenseless players, horsecollars, facemasks and roughing/running into kickers.

The problem is that replay will be able to reverse flags but won't be able to add flags if it sees an obvious penalty.

So an uncalled for facemask almost ripping a QBs head off will stay uncalled because of gambling:

quote:

With NFL betting markets expanding, the league doesn't want "phantom fouls" to be part of the narrative.

"In the era of time of dislegalized sports betting, the burden on you as a fan in the stadium watching the game, and we talk about allowing the game to be played on the field and a phantom foul, a flag is thrown. Just imagine you yourself just thinking about 'where did that come from?' and it just creates a lot of speculation," executive vice president of football operations for the NFL, Troy Vincent said on the Zoom call.

I don't understand how adding a flag will impact betting markets more than reversing one. Either way the eye in the sky has the more objective view.

Washington Football Team forum
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
71725 posts
Posted on 3/28/25 at 2:07 pm to
Make ALL calls reviewable, flags, non flags, whatever. Add two extra challenges. Call it a day.
Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
130483 posts
Posted on 3/28/25 at 2:11 pm to
Let AI do it all

Gonna be a whole lot more offensive holding calls
Posted by bad93ex
Walnut Cove
Member since Sep 2018
35380 posts
Posted on 3/28/25 at 2:17 pm to
These games will be pushing into SEC on CBS time length territory now
Posted by jlovel7
NOT Louisiana
Member since Aug 2014
24027 posts
Posted on 3/28/25 at 2:19 pm to
Longer games woohoo
Posted by red sox fan 13
Valley Park
Member since Aug 2018
19093 posts
Posted on 3/28/25 at 2:30 pm to
Didn’t we try this after the no call
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
54311 posts
Posted on 3/28/25 at 4:49 pm to
quote:

Didn’t we try this after the no call


Yeah refs didn’t like their judgement calls questioned
Posted by TigerSooner
Member since Nov 2023
3634 posts
Posted on 3/28/25 at 10:02 pm to
Great. Where the hell was this when the derelicts sent the SHAMS to the Stupor Bowel instead of the Saints.

I hate the WWNFLOL!!
Posted by deltadummy
Member since Mar 2025
2131 posts
Posted on 3/29/25 at 9:52 am to
Some discussion on rules at the 15:00 mark. I think they need to penalize the offensive player for facemask violation on a stiff arm since the facemask is an area where a defensive player can't even look at.

This post was edited on 3/29/25 at 9:54 am
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
115994 posts
Posted on 3/29/25 at 9:56 am to
Belichick argued for this for years. Same number of challenges, let them challenge anything.

Only argument I’ve ever seen against it is a silly one that it will slow the game down, but again it’s the exact same amount of challenges.

If that is really the concern then every replay should have a 45 second clock for the ref to review it. If you cannot make a call in that time then it’s not clear and obvious and the call on the field should stand
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram