Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Netflix to give Warner Bros. films a 17-day theatrical release window... | Page 2 | Movie/TV Board
Started By
Message

re: Netflix to give Warner Bros. films a 17-day theatrical release window...

Posted on 1/2/26 at 4:09 pm to
Posted by ShoeBang
Member since May 2012
22146 posts
Posted on 1/2/26 at 4:09 pm to
quote:

It’s the worst. This whole thing stinks for movie goers.


Now they can call themselves "Movie Stayers"

It sucks but the world has been moving to streaming only for over a decade. Covid just sped it up.
Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
40070 posts
Posted on 1/2/26 at 5:03 pm to
Fine with me. I don't get fatigued at home.
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
45376 posts
Posted on 1/2/26 at 5:09 pm to
17 days?



Before 2020, a typical run was anywhere from 6-12 weeks in theatre.

Top Gun: Maverick was #1 at the box office on Memorial Day and Labor Day.
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
64546 posts
Posted on 1/2/26 at 5:20 pm to
Come on, gay hobbits!!!
Posted by Sho Nuff
Oahu
Member since Feb 2009
13840 posts
Posted on 1/2/26 at 6:51 pm to
quote:

I agree, there are certainly downsides to the theater - prices, bad luck of having annoying/loud/rude customers in the same theater was you - but man seeing a film in the theater can be just a great and different experience that's really difficult to duplicate at home even with things like surround sound, large and relatively cheap TVs etc

Completely agree. Went to Avatar 3D IMAX on Tuesday and there's no home theater that's going to duplicate. However, I wanted to punch a couple people there
Posted by Jack Ruby
Member since Apr 2014
26953 posts
Posted on 1/2/26 at 10:55 pm to
Are we for sure Netflix is still even able to buy WB? Wasn't Paramount going to poison pill the deal?
Posted by funnystuff
Member since Nov 2012
9062 posts
Posted on 1/3/26 at 7:56 am to
quote:

I think this is a decent compromise.
frick that. Nothing about this is a compromise. This is big money exploiting market power to further consolidate markets. Trump’s DOJ needs to reject this acquisition bigly. Anything else is a betrayal.
This post was edited on 1/3/26 at 8:08 am
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
70636 posts
Posted on 1/4/26 at 10:07 am to
quote:

WB has had an incredible year. Sinners, and Weapons, for example, were huge wins because they stayed in theaters. Sinners kept doing better and better every week. That doesn't happen with a 2 week window.


Think about the amount of people who would have seen those films if they had both premiered on streaming instead. Netflix obviously doesn't need the theatrical business model, otherwise they would release their original films theatrically.

Sinners and Weapons would have made more money for Netflix on its streaming site than it would have in the theater.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
70636 posts
Posted on 1/4/26 at 10:07 am to
quote:

This is big money exploiting market power to further consolidate markets. Trump’s DOJ needs to reject this acquisition bigly. Anything else is a betrayal.


Socialist.
Posted by Jay Are
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2014
6000 posts
Posted on 1/4/26 at 12:31 pm to
quote:

Sinners and Weapons would have made more money for Netflix on its streaming site than it would have in the theater.


How?
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
36458 posts
Posted on 1/4/26 at 12:37 pm to
quote:

Disney did that during Covid for Mulan

I still can’t believe they stripped the songs out of that.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
70636 posts
Posted on 1/4/26 at 1:03 pm to
quote:

How?


Their subscribers. One month of revenue from their subscribers more than makes up for the budgets that they would’ve put into those films had they been the ones who made them.

Why split those profits with the movie theaters when they can make 100% of the profits by releasing it directly to their streaming service?
This post was edited on 1/4/26 at 1:05 pm
Posted by Colonel Flagg
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2010
23467 posts
Posted on 1/4/26 at 2:14 pm to
Assuming Netflix gets on average $12/month for each subscription then they are generating about $43.5 billion in revenue. They really have no reason to put things in theaters. It is an unneeded platform.
Posted by ATrillionaire
Houston
Member since Sep 2008
2832 posts
Posted on 1/4/26 at 5:37 pm to
quote:

frick that. Nothing about this is a compromise. This is big money exploiting market power to further consolidate markets. Trump’s DOJ needs to reject this acquisition bigly. Anything else is a betrayal.

How did Netflix make that big money? What steps have Netflix taken since conception to consolidate market?
Posted by olemc999
At a blackjack table
Member since Oct 2010
15209 posts
Posted on 1/4/26 at 5:48 pm to
So will 500 million be the new billion. Whats the number gonna be that’s considered a success?
Posted by funnystuff
Member since Nov 2012
9062 posts
Posted on 1/4/26 at 7:50 pm to
Posted by funnystuff
Member since Nov 2012
9062 posts
Posted on 1/4/26 at 7:58 pm to
quote:

How did Netflix make that big money?
They brilliantly innovated in a way that added immense value to consumers.

quote:

What steps have Netflix taken since conception to consolidate market?
They bought one of the five majors, a studio who is responsible for 14% market share. And if this headline is accurate, they will use that market share to further diminish the viability of an industry which currently operates as a direct substitute to their primary business model.



Is keeping those two concepts distinct from one another really difficult?
Posted by 1999
Where I be
Member since Oct 2009
33482 posts
Posted on 1/4/26 at 8:01 pm to
Would have really preferred paramount
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram