- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 4/4/22 at 4:23 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
it is 100% inferred. You're taking out the value of moving up two spots in the draft and instead having the Saints move back a spot and claiming that value is "immaterial"
And yet you are 100 percent the only person here that has inferred it that way
Why do you keep saying there’s an order to this? That isn’t how trades work
saints gave up those picks for the eagles picks. They didn’t draw out a narrative structure for the logic of the picks I would suggest getting in a nights rest and revisiting this thread later, I feel like there’s just a massive roadblock for you right now because you think this is some attack on you or the saints, when it’s truly not.
Posted on 4/4/22 at 4:24 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
I definitely don't see this as the case especially in light of the achilles tear.
That is a fair point. It was a good signing for the price and he has the ability to be better than Williams. Is that fair also?
Posted on 4/4/22 at 4:24 pm to Bert Macklin FBI
quote:
They always go bargain shopping in FA and go all in on the draft.
Ehhhh you say that but they have made some fairly big FA signings in the past, and they try to fill every hole to some degree in FA. They haven't done that this year.
Posted on 4/4/22 at 4:25 pm to Fun Bunch
Draft good players with these picks and nobody cares about the price.
Posted on 4/4/22 at 4:25 pm to Chadzilla
Hopefully Drake London falls to 16. London and Trevor Penning would be a great first round haul.
Posted on 4/4/22 at 4:25 pm to wildtigercat93
quote:
Why do you keep saying there’s an order to this?
You are 100% doing the same thing.
quote:
yet you are 100 percent the only person here that has inferred it that way
Maybe not everyone reads and interprets words as carefully
Posted on 4/4/22 at 4:25 pm to shel311
quote:
You're looking at the specific details, breaking up the trade into multiple moves instead of solely looking at what we added vs what we gave up since it's just 1 trade in totality
Each individual piece has its own specific value.
Posted on 4/4/22 at 4:26 pm to wildtigercat93
quote:
I would suggest getting in a nights rest and revisiting this thread later, I feel like there’s just a massive roadblock for you right now because you think this is some attack on you or the saints, when it’s truly not.
I would suggest doing the same, because you are being equally blind to what I am saying.
Posted on 4/4/22 at 4:26 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
Ehhhh you say that but they have made some fairly big FA signings in the past, and they try to fill every hole to some degree in FA. They haven't done that this year.
I don't think we have made a high dollar FA signing since Jairus Byrd. I am not certain of this so please correct me if I'm wrong.
The typical saints FA signing is a guy like Demario Davis who we signed on the cheap or Malcom Jenkins who we signed late in his career. We typically don't go after the big name guys.
Posted on 4/4/22 at 4:27 pm to Chadzilla
We almost have enough first round picks to re-draft Marcus Davenport
Posted on 4/4/22 at 4:28 pm to Bert Macklin FBI
I personally cannot remember having two glaring holes on the roster and having neither addressed to some positive degree in FA.
The Saints having some serious holes at LT and WR is highly unusual.
FA isn't over yet though.
The Saints having some serious holes at LT and WR is highly unusual.
FA isn't over yet though.
Posted on 4/4/22 at 4:31 pm to Fun Bunch
My last point here. If I'm judging this move for the Saints I look at it as:
16 & 19 for the 18/1st/2nd/3rd
or
16 for 1st/2nd/3rd
I'm going to arrive at the exact same conclusion either way. The reason is because the difference between 18 and 19 are not enough to move the needle in either direction.
16 & 19 for the 18/1st/2nd/3rd
or
16 for 1st/2nd/3rd
I'm going to arrive at the exact same conclusion either way. The reason is because the difference between 18 and 19 are not enough to move the needle in either direction.
Posted on 4/4/22 at 4:33 pm to Byron Bojangles III
quote:
or send one or both for DK and fully unleash Lasik Jameis
Metcalf has 0 chance of happening. Saints are not going to trade a 1st for a WR getting ready for top money.
Posted on 4/4/22 at 4:33 pm to blizzle
quote:
We almost have enough first round picks to re-draft Marcus Davenport
Posted on 4/4/22 at 4:40 pm to blizzle
quote:Nice one!
We almost have enough first round picks to re-draft Marcus Davenport
Posted on 4/4/22 at 4:40 pm to Fun Bunch
Bunch we could have gotten both no doubt but paid a ridiculous price. The FA market was thin and over priced this year.
But your right it would not have happened under CSP.
But your right it would not have happened under CSP.
Posted on 4/4/22 at 4:42 pm to rondo
quote:
Maybe they anticipate getting compensatory picks or trading Sean Payton and would rather get new toys now?
Someone else said the 3rd doesn't count b/c it's a compensatory pick...this doesn't make sense. These picks matter and have a lot of value. We should anticipate getting more picks to make more picks. The best way to increase chances of making a good selection are to acquire more picks in the top 3 rounds.
Posted on 4/4/22 at 4:43 pm to moneyg
quote:
We are probably targeting a QB in the top 10.
My melt would be the worst ever seen on this board.
Posted on 4/4/22 at 4:44 pm to blizzle
quote:
We almost have enough first round picks to re-draft Marcus Davenport
His name is payton turner
Get ready for andrus pest
Page 10 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News