Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Saints and Eagles trade draft picks | Page 6 | Saints Talk
Started By
Message

re: Saints and Eagles trade draft picks

Posted on 4/4/22 at 3:40 pm to
Posted by dj30
New Orleans
Member since Feb 2006
29855 posts
Posted on 4/4/22 at 3:40 pm to
When we traded a future 1st for Mark Ingram in 2011, we gave up a 2nd that year and a 1st the next year.

Jumping from 18 to 16 costs around a 3 or 4 I believe.

With the combo of the 2nd round pick being in 2024 and the swap of the 6th for a 7th that should even out the value of us including the 3rd instead of a 4th.

Value seems right based on past trade values.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
128681 posts
Posted on 4/4/22 at 3:41 pm to
quote:

Those two assets are near identical in value, so the trade is much easier to understand if you just ignore it and look at the rest of the trade.


That doesn't make any sense.
Posted by Clark W Griswold
THE USA
Member since Sep 2012
10920 posts
Posted on 4/4/22 at 3:41 pm to
There aren’t QBs worth taking. WR and OT.
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
115966 posts
Posted on 4/4/22 at 3:42 pm to
quote:

That doesn't make any sense.


Is there truly a material difference in value between pick 18 and pick 19?
Posted by Parallax
Member since Feb 2016
1459 posts
Posted on 4/4/22 at 3:42 pm to
Only way this makes sense is if we can trade these 2 picks for a top-10 pick this year, but who in the top-10 is worth us moving up for?

Otherwise, it feels like an overpay to essentially give up a 1st, 2nd and 3rd round pick to get a 1st one year sooner. That is assuming we don't fall on our face and suck this year... imagine if we traded a top-10 pick next year plus the 2nd/3rd for a mid-1st round pick this year in a down draft. Ireland will need to work his magic.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
128681 posts
Posted on 4/4/22 at 3:43 pm to
quote:

Is there truly a material difference in value between pick 18 and pick 19?


Sigh.

That isn't what happened.

They used 18, a 3rd, future first, and 2024 second to acquire 16 and 19.

The way you are framing it is completely disingenuous.
Posted by GynoSandberg
Bay St Louis, MS
Member since Jan 2006
74125 posts
Posted on 4/4/22 at 3:44 pm to
Big picture play

We cleared the cap hit didn’t feel compelled to just spend (rightfully so imo). Now you hopefully secure two core guys on rookie deals, which is nice bc we are likely drafting high priced positions. Three in the top 50 that can help immediately is better than overpaying these FA
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
59393 posts
Posted on 4/4/22 at 3:44 pm to
This is some weird shite
Posted by VA LSU fan
Virginia
Member since Dec 2007
8730 posts
Posted on 4/4/22 at 3:46 pm to
Would love Stingley and Cross, Neal, or Ekwonu
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112677 posts
Posted on 4/4/22 at 3:46 pm to
quote:

We are only losing essentially a 2nd rounder in 2024. We swap this year for next year first and the 3rd is a compensatory pick
I don't think that's a good way to look at it.

Even if it's a comp pick, we still are going from two 3rds to one 3rd.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112677 posts
Posted on 4/4/22 at 3:47 pm to
quote:

That’s the most concerning part to me. Another injury to Winston, MT etc and it could be top 10 easily

I've always found it weird that NFL never puts protections on picks like the NBA.

Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
115966 posts
Posted on 4/4/22 at 3:47 pm to
I feel like I’m saying the sky is blue and you are yelling at me that ACTUALLY THE SKY IS BLUE SIR

This isn’t a formula with an equation to follow saints gave up their set of picks that included 18, eagles gave up their set of picks that included 19

If you’re judging the overall value of the trade, those two assets are as close to the same thing as you can get in NFL draft terms. They are 1 pick apart in the same draft. An easier way to read a pretty confusing sentence that was in Schefter a tweet and your posts, it to just call that a wash and evaluate the rest of the compensation on both sides

I’m not being negative about this or being disingenuous at all, I was trying to make the trade more understandable because it took my brain a solid 10 minutes to try to piece it together when I first read it
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
128681 posts
Posted on 4/4/22 at 3:48 pm to
I think the dream would be someone like Olave at 16 and someone like Raimann at 18.

But this is the Saints they will probably draft a Guard that played Center in college and a Defensive End
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
128681 posts
Posted on 4/4/22 at 3:49 pm to
You're trying to throw out acquiring a 2nd 1st round pick in this year's draft.

In no universe will that make sense, no matter how many laughing emojis you throw in.

Shouldn't you be more worried about what the Patriots are up to?
Posted by Weekend Warrior79
Member since Aug 2014
21153 posts
Posted on 4/4/22 at 3:50 pm to
The random 6th & 7th round picks always make me laugh in these trades. Are they implying that if those picks aren't thrown in there the trade will never happen?
Posted by htran90
BC
Member since Dec 2012
32117 posts
Posted on 4/4/22 at 3:50 pm to
quote:

Is there truly a material difference in value between pick 18 and pick 19?



No

However the question becomes the value of:
2022 3rd rounder
2023 1st rounder
2024 2nd rounder
= 16

Which in reality value wise...about right if not better.
Future 1sts tend to equal a current year 2nd. So if that's the case, we're talking about equivalent of this year's 3rd, 2nd, and a 3rd.

but i'm not for giving up future picks in an unknown situation.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112677 posts
Posted on 4/4/22 at 3:53 pm to
quote:

You're trying to throw out acquiring a 2nd 1st round pick in this year's draft.

In no universe will that make sense, no matter how many laughing emojis you throw in.
I think you're missing on what he's saying, to be honest.

He's not throwing out acquiring another 1st, he's still accounting for pick #16.
Posted by Gumbyxl
Gretna
Member since Apr 2004
793 posts
Posted on 4/4/22 at 3:53 pm to
Some of these people are intellectually challenged. ROFL.
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
115966 posts
Posted on 4/4/22 at 3:53 pm to
quote:

You're trying to throw out acquiring a 2nd 1st round pick in this year's draft.


Because they already had a first rounder at an identical place before this trade.

The cost of acquiring the 16th pick is still exactly the same in the way I lay it out as the way you have laid it out

quote:

Shouldn't you be more worried about what the Patriots are up to?


Look man, I come in absolute peace. I have no idea why you took offense to this, I’m just trying to explain what I said. I never come on this board looking for shite, I usually come during the offseason when the MSB doesn’t really post a bunch about the NFL. You can put the fisticuffs away
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112677 posts
Posted on 4/4/22 at 3:53 pm to
quote:

No

However the question becomes the value of:
2022 3rd rounder
2023 1st rounder
2024 2nd rounder
= 16
Bunchie, this is exactly what wildtiger is saying.
Jump to page
Page First 4 5 6 7 8 ... 14
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 14Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram