Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us NASA has announced that Artemis II is go for launch... | Page 3 | O-T Lounge
Started By
Message

re: NASA has announced that Artemis II is go for launch...

Posted on 1/3/26 at 8:20 am to
Posted by cssamerican
Member since Mar 2011
8070 posts
Posted on 1/3/26 at 8:20 am to
quote:

They aren't going as close as the Artemis 1 mission which passed 81 miles above the surface of the moon. They are passing over 6,000 miles above the surface on the manned mission. Not sure what kind of images they will get?

Wait…they aren’t landing. Well how do we know Astronauts went and not just an unmanned craft that’s taking pictures? The belt wins again
Posted by cypresstiger
The South
Member since Aug 2008
13808 posts
Posted on 1/3/26 at 8:58 am to
LINK
More Bethany
This post was edited on 1/3/26 at 8:59 am
Posted by Patsy Parisi
Member since Dec 2025
874 posts
Posted on 1/3/26 at 9:57 am to
Posted by AlwysATgr
Member since Apr 2008
20530 posts
Posted on 1/3/26 at 10:24 am to
quote:

Money won't speed progress,


This is partly so.

NASA (and Boeing - Artemis core stage contractor) have a severe case of DEI. At this point, it is enculturated. Until that is uprooted, pumping more funding into them would result in stoopid initiatives like Muslim outreach, etc.

IDK where China stands with their space program. They play dirty. I would not underestimate their ability to make advances.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
70592 posts
Posted on 1/3/26 at 10:28 am to
quote:

Wait…they aren’t landing. Well how do we know Astronauts went and not just an unmanned craft that’s taking pictures? The belt wins again


Nope. They aren't landing. Artemis II is a manned shakedown flight to make sure systems are operating nominally. Artemis III (scheduled for 2027) is the flight that will land humans on the moon.

But let's be honest - they could take a selfie at the Apollo 11 landing site or sit in the rover Apollo 17 left behind and you still wouldn't believe it was real.
This post was edited on 1/3/26 at 10:30 am
Posted by cssamerican
Member since Mar 2011
8070 posts
Posted on 1/3/26 at 10:52 am to
quote:

But let's be honest - they could take a selfie at the Apollo 11 landing site or sit in the rover Apollo 17 left behind and you still wouldn't believe it was real.

My sarcasm apparently wasn’t detected
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
73327 posts
Posted on 1/3/26 at 2:29 pm to
The moon isn't real.
Posted by wareaglepete
Union of Soviet Auburn Republics
Member since Dec 2012
17955 posts
Posted on 1/3/26 at 2:56 pm to
Who thinks they make that Feb. 6th date?

Bet it gets scrubbed and
postponed.


Ok, watched the video. She said the launch window opens as early as Feb. 6 and then they will assess.
This post was edited on 1/3/26 at 2:59 pm
Posted by Wally Sparks
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2013
32614 posts
Posted on 1/3/26 at 3:32 pm to
quote:

Ok, watched the video. She said the launch window opens as early as Feb. 6 and then they will assess.


I’d like to assess her.
Posted by TigerGman
Center of the Universe
Member since Sep 2006
13716 posts
Posted on 1/3/26 at 3:57 pm to
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
25735 posts
Posted on 1/3/26 at 4:52 pm to
The thing is not even reusable.
Posted by MoarKilometers
Member since Apr 2015
20931 posts
Posted on 1/3/26 at 5:01 pm to
quote:

The thing is not even reusable.

How's the recycling company's reusable lunar rocket going? Does it finally leave low earth orbit in 2026?
Posted by sabanisarustedspoke
Member since Jan 2007
5796 posts
Posted on 1/3/26 at 6:18 pm to
quote:

No ones says we haven't flown around the moon or put shite.on the moon. Most that have an issue with the moon landing is the human aspect of the whole deal. All theyre doing is flying around the moon.
I bet that the china/russia teamup put humans on the actual moon before we do "again".


No actually the entire conspiracy is based on the theory that we haven't sent a human more than 1000 miles off planet.
Posted by lsugorilla
PNW
Member since Sep 2009
6638 posts
Posted on 1/3/26 at 6:28 pm to
The money spent on this can be spent on so many other things that can directly impact lives in a more positive way.
Posted by ATrillionaire
Houston
Member since Sep 2008
2817 posts
Posted on 1/3/26 at 8:41 pm to
quote:

The money spent on this can be spent on so many other things that can directly impact lives in a more positive way.

It's not your money.
Posted by northshorebamaman
Cochise County AZ
Member since Jul 2009
37921 posts
Posted on 1/3/26 at 9:21 pm to
quote:

The money spent on this can be spent on so many other things that can directly impact lives in a more positive way.
Impactful like GPS, weather forecasting, medical imaging, satellite communications, and the microchips in everything you use daily?

Space spending isn’t abstract science money, it’s one of the most direct pipelines to everyday tech we have. People just forget where it came from.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram