- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 10/6/25 at 10:41 am to Fun Bunch
TIL - Lavender Marriage
A "lavender marriage" is a marriage between a man and a woman where one or both partners are closeted homosexual, often formed to conceal their sexuality from society and gain the benefits of a legal union.
A "lavender marriage" is a marriage between a man and a woman where one or both partners are closeted homosexual, often formed to conceal their sexuality from society and gain the benefits of a legal union.
Posted on 10/6/25 at 10:41 am to Fun Bunch
None of that registers with me. It would mean the same if it were written in Chinese, which I can’t read.
Posted on 10/6/25 at 10:41 am to chryso
quote:
What the hell does Mx mean?
Mix. Of male and female.
Posted on 10/6/25 at 10:41 am to Cdawg
Thanks. I have no clue what that was I am glad someone looked it up
Posted on 10/6/25 at 10:42 am to Fun Bunch
What the hell did I just read?
Posted on 10/6/25 at 10:43 am to Fun Bunch
Mx Benson got more play in one night than most the OT gets in a year
Posted on 10/6/25 at 10:52 am to BluegrassBelle
quote:
The violinist was in a "lavender marriage", which is when people of two different genders (male/female) get married but at least one of them is gay.
WTF? Yeah, frick all of those people. We deserve to be flooded again.
Posted on 10/6/25 at 10:53 am to Fun Bunch
I love the NYT lifestyle articles, so often filled with utter nonsense
This is one in particular is very on brand
write an article about Gen Z divorces, the only man they quoted is a 50 year old lawyer.
First divorcee wasn't even married
This is one in particular is very on brand
write an article about Gen Z divorces, the only man they quoted is a 50 year old lawyer.
First divorcee wasn't even married
Posted on 10/6/25 at 10:54 am to Fun Bunch
IDGAF what anybody says these people are insane. Open the asylums back up Trump but you will have to open up A LOT of them.
Posted on 10/6/25 at 10:56 am to 225rumpshaker
quote:
That reads like a Babylon Bee article to be honest
100% a troll piece.
People need to learn to recognize when a hand is overplayed badly.
Posted on 10/6/25 at 10:57 am to forkedintheroad
quote:
100% a troll piece.
People need to learn to recognize when a hand is overplayed badly.
Nah, this is a normal relationship in Seattle
Posted on 10/6/25 at 10:57 am to Fun Bunch
I don’t even know what’s happening.
Posted on 10/6/25 at 10:58 am to RLDSC FAN
quote:
Mental illness is a lot worse than we think it is
No, this is Toxic Empathy run amok and "therapists" are making some bank.
Posted on 10/6/25 at 11:00 am to RLDSC FAN
quote:
Mental illness is a lot worse than we think it is
100%. i feel like i live on a different planet than these people. I literally dont even understand the paragraph and what is going on.
Posted on 10/6/25 at 11:02 am to Fun Bunch
What therapist comes out and says divorce is a "good choice". 
Posted on 10/6/25 at 11:04 am to Fun Bunch
AI"s comments:
I believe it — the New York Times has been running more of these heavily “stylized” human-interest pieces that read more like creative writing exercises than traditional reporting. They lean into identity language, niche cultural references, and a sort of ironic/quirky tone.
From a plain-language reader’s perspective, though, it can feel like “literary garbage” — cluttered with jargon, awkward pronouns, and cultural in-jokes that obscure the actual story. Stripped down, it’s just:
A young woman in Seattle ended a sham marriage.
She got support from her therapist and her husband’s mistress.
They all ended up hanging out eating comfort food and playing a video game.
But the NYT wrapped that simple storyline in layers of social-signaling language.
I believe it — the New York Times has been running more of these heavily “stylized” human-interest pieces that read more like creative writing exercises than traditional reporting. They lean into identity language, niche cultural references, and a sort of ironic/quirky tone.
From a plain-language reader’s perspective, though, it can feel like “literary garbage” — cluttered with jargon, awkward pronouns, and cultural in-jokes that obscure the actual story. Stripped down, it’s just:
A young woman in Seattle ended a sham marriage.
She got support from her therapist and her husband’s mistress.
They all ended up hanging out eating comfort food and playing a video game.
But the NYT wrapped that simple storyline in layers of social-signaling language.
Posted on 10/6/25 at 11:05 am to Fun Bunch
I had a seizure trying to read this
Posted on 10/6/25 at 11:06 am to Fun Bunch
quote:Well this is the least surprising thing ever.
When it comes to the division of assets, Mr. Moher pointed out that there is often little property to split — again, even the oldest Gen Z divorcés are only in their late 20s — though there’s a good deal of student debt and more digital currencies like Bitcoin to contend with.
quote:That generation is so fricked.
According to Mx. Wallace, many members of Gen Z, even the newly married, see marriage as a commitment that is neither final nor exclusive. The rise of nontraditional relationship models reshaped expectations of married life and, when nonmonogamous options are on the table, some of marriage’s stricter requirements are defanged.
Posted on 10/6/25 at 11:20 am to boogiewoogie1978
quote:
What therapist comes out and says divorce is a "good choice".
An unethical one. Helping someone come to the conclusion that their situation is untenable is entirely different then telling someone they should divorce.
Popular
Back to top


0










