- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Harris WILL take away our guns
Posted on 7/31/24 at 9:57 am to No Colors
Posted on 7/31/24 at 9:57 am to No Colors
quote:
This thread is actually typical of the scare tactics Trump would use to mobilize his base.
"KAMALA is coming after your guns!!!"
Spare me the political theatre. No one is coming after your guns.
Posted on 7/31/24 at 9:59 am to Lonnie Utah
We have the Supreme Court currently, but the court makeup could change a bit with a communist president.
Posted on 7/31/24 at 9:59 am to cgrand
quote:
scare tactics to mobilize her base.
the 2nd amendment isn’t going anywhere…
we can agree that the 2nd Amendment is going no where....but I can tell you that we have been on a slippery slope for a while now.
EX: how many lists have guns or gun owners on them?
with no push back we will all wake up one day and some random lawyer will define what a "gun" is. Or they will have limited ammunition, or clip size.
the average guy just need to start speaking up.
Posted on 7/31/24 at 10:02 am to No Colors
quote:
This thread is actually typical of the scare tactics Trump would use to mobilize his base.
Trump got Kamala to say "We want to ban assault weapons" just to energize his own base? That's some impressive persuasion.
Fudds suck.
Posted on 7/31/24 at 10:04 am to Screaming Viking
i find it pretty humorous that the "give an inch they'll take a mile" argument is so frequent when it comes to gun rights, while the firearm industry consistently and deliberately does that exact same thing...
2A was the inch in 1789. bump stocks, braces, 100 round drums, etc are the mile
2A was the inch in 1789. bump stocks, braces, 100 round drums, etc are the mile
Posted on 7/31/24 at 10:09 am to Tiger Pants 318
quote:
cgrand
quote:
This man gets it.
Except for this part
quote:
If you are prudent you already have what you want.
Why should we have to hoard or buy in a way to protect against a future tyrant? There should be no tyrant. I understand your point but why should a living 17 yr old today, who gains certain rights and legalities next year and in 4 years be restricted to the freedoms you and I enjoy?
I do agree guns arent going anywhere. You make some good points. I just agree with the aforementioned slippery slope.
This post was edited on 7/31/24 at 10:11 am
Posted on 7/31/24 at 10:14 am to Tiger Pants 318
quote:
Everybody needs to settle down with this stuff.
You mean like the 6 months earlier this year where I had to remove a gun part from a pistol so I wasn't a felon? Yes it got overturned but what about those 6 months of tyranny? You just shrug it off? You and I are not alike in that regard
Posted on 7/31/24 at 10:17 am to cgrand
quote:So we should only be allowed to possess 1789 firearm technology?
2A was the inch in 1789. bump stocks, braces, 100 round drums, etc are the mile
Posted on 7/31/24 at 10:20 am to Sixafan
I didn’t need a reason to buy more, but now that I do…..what should I buy? Preferably handguns 9mm and/or AR .556 (why not both)
Posted on 7/31/24 at 10:24 am to rattlebucket
Are people hoarding to protect against a future tyrant? Or are people hoarding because they are being told by someone or something that there will be a future tyrant and that tyrant will do something that will make you want to hoard (ie purchase) things right now? I lean more towards the latter than the former.
Yes. I shrug off those 6 months of absolute tyranny.
We are not alike in our definition of tyranny. We are also not alike in our definition of felon.
quote:
Yes it got overturned but what about those 6 months of tyranny?
Yes. I shrug off those 6 months of absolute tyranny.
quote:
You and I are not alike in that regard
We are not alike in our definition of tyranny. We are also not alike in our definition of felon.
This post was edited on 7/31/24 at 10:33 am
Posted on 7/31/24 at 11:06 am to Flats
quote:
Trump got Kamala to say "We want to ban assault weapons" just to energize his own base?
No. A social media post titled "Harris WILL take away your guns"....that's a scare tactic.
Posted on 7/31/24 at 11:11 am to No Colors
quote:
No. A social media post titled "Harris WILL take away your guns"....that's a scare tactic.
You mean a politician exaggerated the impact of his opponent's policies? You think that's unique to Trump?
Posted on 7/31/24 at 11:15 am to Sixafan
quote:
Harris WILL take away our guns
And laugh like a crazy wicked witch while doing it!
Posted on 7/31/24 at 11:26 am to Flats
quote:
You mean a politician exaggerated the impact of his opponent's policies? You think that's unique to Trump?
No. Once again that's not what I am saying..
I am saying that people pick out any point from the side they don't like and exaggerate it in order to trigger a reaction. It's not unique to any issue or any side.
"Harris WILL take your guns" is the same as "Trump will send gay people to concentration camps" or any other such nonsense.
Posted on 7/31/24 at 11:29 am to Sixafan
If she wins, she will go down as the second best gun salesman of all time.
Posted on 7/31/24 at 11:33 am to No Colors
quote:
"Harris WILL take your guns" is the same as "Trump will send gay people to concentration camps" or any other such nonsense.
A pretty big difference is that Harris would like to do that. Trump wouldn't.
I agree that the urgency is absurdly hyped, but they'd love nothing more than to chip away. If we haven't figured out by now that the left plays the long game we haven't figured out anything, and they're happy to do the same with gun control. And I truly don't understand gun owners who really don't give a shite about any aspect of the 2nd outside of how any restrictions would impact them personally.
I don't run around with large amounts of cash but I still think civil asset forfeiture is a horrible abuse of power and violation of rights.
Posted on 7/31/24 at 11:57 am to cgrand
quote:m
the idea that this country “can’t survive” an administration led by the opposition part is a republican construct
I agree
The Republican Party is constantly screeching that Trump will ‘end democracy’
Posted on 7/31/24 at 12:59 pm to Lonnie Utah
Like that has stopped them from suing gun manufacturers, imposing taxes in ammunition, passing illegal laws and using taxpayer money to defend the lawsuit.
Popular
Back to top


0




