- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 5/11/20 at 2:59 pm to cwill
quote:Interesting. Can you link me saying this?
Like your cool story that the mouthbreather was just chilling on the left side of the car
quote:Um...…...that's what occurred. It's not like we can't watch it again if you like.
when arbery made a HARD left turn around the right side and made a long run
I mean, admittedly, it was ballsy on his part. But, that's what Arbury did.
Posted on 5/11/20 at 2:59 pm to Azkiger
quote:
Agreed, but he still could have seen Aubrey "the other night" even if someone else is in the videos.
Yes or he could have been mistaken.
Doesn’t matter now.
Posted on 5/11/20 at 2:59 pm to doubleb
quote:
It would make more sense.
how so?
Posted on 5/11/20 at 3:03 pm to JohnnyKilroy
quote:
The video on the day of the incident? The one that the mcmichaels hadn’t seen prior to chasing AA
The mcmichaels, unless someone else is in their driveway next to their truck, are outside a couple doors down in their driveway when AA was in the house. Let’s not be emotional and let the facts come out.
quote:
At the distant periphery of the video, two people can be seen around a parked pickup truck in a driveway a a few houses down from the construction site. The driveway is at or near Travis McMichael’s house.
Posted on 5/11/20 at 3:06 pm to cwill
quote:
He's wearing tennis shoes of some variety, but he's not wearing boots as was the popular theory yesterday from a pixilated pic.
Why is this important? Are you still trying to pretend that he actually was just jogging and getting exercise?
Posted on 5/11/20 at 3:07 pm to moneyg
quote:
how so?
I could better understand why the two guys were involved.
Posted on 5/11/20 at 3:08 pm to KiwiHead
quote:
Arbery had every right to mount an affirmative even aggressive defense once McMichael gets out of a truck with weapon in hand.
Does he have that right if he had been in the process of committing a crime?
Posted on 5/11/20 at 3:08 pm to RollTide1987
Interesting. They do look like they are wearing similar clothes in the first clip and the shooting clip.
Posted on 5/11/20 at 3:10 pm to moneyg
quote:
Does he have that right if he had been in the process of committing a crime?
Yes.
Posted on 5/11/20 at 3:10 pm to doubleb
quote:
I could better understand why the two guys were involved.
They were involved because they thought this guy (right or wrong) was a burglar. Even if they were wrong, this makes the same amount of sense as if they were right.
Posted on 5/11/20 at 3:10 pm to ShortyRob
For appropriate context, here is the area in which the incident took place. Per the police report, the actual shooting took place at the intersection of Satilla Drive and Holmes Road . Note that the neighborhood is a small peninsula surrounded on three sides by water. There was no place for Ahmaud Arbery to go. All that was necessary was to remain at the intersection of Satilla Drive and Zellwood Drive. It is the only entrance into the area. Per the Glynn County Police Department Incident Report, Ahmaud Arbery was chased at least once back up Satilla Drive before he ran back down towards Burford Road and the struggle ensued with Travis McMichael. He was already cornered.


This post was edited on 5/11/20 at 3:17 pm
Posted on 5/11/20 at 3:11 pm to moneyg
quote:
Why is this important?
Good question. Why do people keep pretending it’s important that he wouldn’t be wearing athletic shoes?
Posted on 5/11/20 at 3:11 pm to the808bass
quote:
The second, third or fourth time they block the road?
The time where you can run straight and not grab the barrel of a shotgun.
This post was edited on 5/11/20 at 3:12 pm
Posted on 5/11/20 at 3:12 pm to the808bass
quote:
Does he have that right if he had been in the process of committing a crime?
Yes.
I disagree. If you are caught breaking into someone's home, and they confront you with a gun, it's not reasonable to charge them under the idea that it is self defense.
Posted on 5/11/20 at 3:12 pm to Azkiger
quote:
Nah, probably about as dumb to run someone down with a gun in your hands.
You just repeated what I said.
Posted on 5/11/20 at 3:15 pm to moneyg
quote:
They were involved because they thought this guy (right or wrong) was a burglar. Even if they were wrong, this makes the same amount of sense as if they were right.
Are these guys sitting around waiting to play cop?
Are these guys in a neighborhood watch?
Did they tell owner/builder to call them for help?
In other words, how and why are they involved.
If they had witnessed the break in, I wouldn’t have these questions. I would know how they got involved.
Posted on 5/11/20 at 3:17 pm to moneyg
quote:
If you are caught breaking into someone's home, and they confront you with a gun, it's not reasonable to charge them under the idea that it is self defense.
So, was that home the McMichael's?
Posted on 5/11/20 at 3:18 pm to moneyg
quote:
I disagree. If you are caught breaking into someone's home, and they confront you with a gun, it's not reasonable to charge them under the idea that it is self defense.
That’s a very different and more specific instance. A person who is jaywalking who has a gun pointed at them could still claim self defense.
Posted on 5/11/20 at 3:20 pm to the808bass
quote:
Good question. Why do people keep pretending it’s important that he wouldn’t be wearing athletic shoes?
I can't answer for everyone, but my guess is that it was to show that he wasn't simply out for a jog. That's what makes sense to me.
Do you think he was out for a jog?
Popular
Back to top


0






