- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Black Insurrectionist -- Posts 1-13 Links
Posted on 10/14/24 at 12:07 pm to NC_Tigah
Posted on 10/14/24 at 12:07 pm to NC_Tigah
60 trips to China with kids.
There is a very good chance he is compromised by China if the accusations are found to be creditable.
Just with the validated facts about his past you would think the idiots vetting him would have seen all the red flags.
The Dems taking stupidity to another level and should loose them some votes at least just because of the poor vetting for their party.
There is a very good chance he is compromised by China if the accusations are found to be creditable.
Just with the validated facts about his past you would think the idiots vetting him would have seen all the red flags.
The Dems taking stupidity to another level and should loose them some votes at least just because of the poor vetting for their party.
1
Posted on 10/14/24 at 12:08 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
he's LARPing
Posted on 10/14/24 at 12:09 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
The Harris campaign has modified that number to ~15 trips, most were in the 1990's. All were associated with students
That’s much more believable. Why was the number initially 60? The only “civilians” who are traveling to China 60 times are intel assets.
Posted on 10/14/24 at 12:10 pm to NC_Tigah
He's pretending to be some sort of journalist. What's confusing?
Posted on 10/14/24 at 12:15 pm to SlowFlowPro
look I know if I had hard core evidence someone was a pedophile, I would probably say hey let's slow leak this information out there piece by piece and really draw this thing out.
Posted on 10/14/24 at 12:16 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Unless present day journalism, in general, is a LARP, your assertion is bizarre. If it is, can one LARP a LARP?
He's pretending to be some sort of journalist. What's confusing?
Posted on 10/14/24 at 12:17 pm to BilJ
So far the best was when he wasted one whole post saying he HAD THE SCHOOL BOARD MINUTES that proved everything....that's it. Just let us know he had them. Didn't post them.
Then he posts the records, which proves nothing, but he referenced the PRIVATE meeting....nothing.
Then he said he was done for the day and 43 more were on their way
Then he posts the records, which proves nothing, but he referenced the PRIVATE meeting....nothing.
Then he said he was done for the day and 43 more were on their way
Posted on 10/14/24 at 12:19 pm to BilJ
Maybe he's creating or propagating a story he doesn't really have any proof of for clicks and followers. Maybe he's trying to methodically lay out the facts of the story and it's taking several posts. He doesn't have a podcast, he doesn't have a media platform where he can release pages and pages of info at once. Let's just wait and see if he delivers. If he doesn't, he's a fraud and finished as an "influencer".
Posted on 10/14/24 at 12:20 pm to SlowFlowPro
I'm not convinced this doesn't have some legs, after all it squares with the creepy vibe a lot of people get from Walz and his wife.
That said, one of the biggest red flags for me thus far are all the comms saying "Doc you're the only one who can help" as though this Twitter influencer is a household name.
Of course, it may just be that this personality happens to be someone followed by the accuser, but it's a little suspicious to me.
the second thing I find suspect is how the direct communications (I can't talk more now; that's enough for now; etc.) dovetail nicely for the influencer dude to very slowly roll this out
That said, one of the biggest red flags for me thus far are all the comms saying "Doc you're the only one who can help" as though this Twitter influencer is a household name.
Of course, it may just be that this personality happens to be someone followed by the accuser, but it's a little suspicious to me.
the second thing I find suspect is how the direct communications (I can't talk more now; that's enough for now; etc.) dovetail nicely for the influencer dude to very slowly roll this out
Posted on 10/14/24 at 12:22 pm to the808bass
quote:
quote: The Harris campaign has modified that number to ~15 trips, most were in the 1990's. All were associated with students That’s much more believable. Why was the number initially 60? The only “civilians” who are traveling to China 60 times are intel assets.
Even 15 trips is plenty enough to be compromised.
Besides loosing some voters, the dark money donors have got to be boiling mad now about throwing their money away to these incompetent bafoons at the DNC.
More fighting amongst themselves is good!
Posted on 10/14/24 at 12:22 pm to Pettifogger
Handle it exactly like the “Russian Dossier” and the piss hookers
Posted on 10/14/24 at 12:23 pm to Adajax
quote:
Maybe he's trying to methodically lay out the facts of the story and it's taking several posts.
He's not doing this, though. That's why it's laughable and his methods are clearly a money/attention grab.
He's even making weird choices to validate certain allegations (or aspects of them), like sending a comment to the campaign via their "Contact us" website box, instead of...emailing them. It shows either he's not good at this (and should have let a real journalist do this) or he's engaging in dishonest behavior.
Note for smoothbrains: that comment doesn't discuss the veracity of the allegations themselves.
Posted on 10/14/24 at 12:24 pm to Pettifogger
Biggest red flag for me is this dude didn’t create these posts in his drafts and publish them sequentially at the same time.
He said he wasn’t “tech savvy,” re: starting a thread instead of making 60 individual separate posts, but needing 2+ days to post all the information is bonkers.
He was also deliberately waiting 20-30 min or more between each post when he started the process. Literally not a single post he’s made should have taken more than 2 minutes to create.
Dude’s a grifter, and we need to be very careful how much time we spend talking about this. Reeks of a setup, and it’s a really fricking bad look to falsely accuse someone of sexual predation.
He said he wasn’t “tech savvy,” re: starting a thread instead of making 60 individual separate posts, but needing 2+ days to post all the information is bonkers.
He was also deliberately waiting 20-30 min or more between each post when he started the process. Literally not a single post he’s made should have taken more than 2 minutes to create.
Dude’s a grifter, and we need to be very careful how much time we spend talking about this. Reeks of a setup, and it’s a really fricking bad look to falsely accuse someone of sexual predation.
This post was edited on 10/14/24 at 12:25 pm
Posted on 10/14/24 at 12:24 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
I'm not convinced this doesn't have some legs, after all it squares with the creepy vibe a lot of people get from Walz and his wife.
You have to think about priming and presentation.
Imagine how easy it would be to craft a false story about Trump that DU would eat up and feel it squared with how they perceive his vibe.
Posted on 10/14/24 at 12:25 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
I'm not convinced this doesn't have some legs, after all it squares with the creepy vibe a lot of people get from Walz and his wife. That said, one of the biggest red flags for me thus far are all the comms saying "Doc you're the only one who can help" as though this Twitter influencer is a household name. Of course, it may just be that this personality happens to be someone followed by the accuser, but it's a little suspicious to me. the second thing I find suspect is how the direct communications (I can't talk more now; that's enough for now; etc.) dovetail nicely for the influencer dude to very slowly roll this out
I’m almost positive this part is bullshite but it may be useful propoganda in unsealing the records on Walz’s teaching/coaching past. If that’s what it’s being used for, it’s smart angle.
Posted on 10/14/24 at 12:26 pm to ItNeverRains
quote:
it may be useful propoganda in unsealing the records on Walz’s teaching/coaching past.
...how?
You mean like a victim will come out and get this started?
Posted on 10/14/24 at 12:29 pm to Tuscaloosa
quote:
Biggest red flag for me is this dude didn’t create these posts in his drafts and publish them sequentially at the same time.
Just a couple of weeks ago the same guy invented an “ABC Debate whistleblower”.
Posted on 10/14/24 at 12:29 pm to Adajax
quote:
Maybe he's trying to methodically lay out the facts of the story and it's taking several posts. He doesn't have a podcast, he doesn't have a media platform where he can release pages and pages of info at once.
dude just decides in the middle of dumping info that could implicate the running mate for the highest office in the world of pedophilia to take a 15-20 hour break? Ehhhhhh...
Posted on 10/14/24 at 12:30 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
the second thing I find suspect is how the direct communications (I can't talk more now; that's enough for now; etc.) dovetail nicely for the influencer dude to very slowly roll this out
Taking advantage of a story to build your followers, doesn't make the story false. If the accuser does in fact go public and takes this to the courts should get the facts if it's true or false.
I do however find it interesting how some lady get 87M from Trump for a rape story with no real facts to corroborate it though.
Posted on 10/14/24 at 12:30 pm to SlowFlowPro
This is not how you handle the release of “essential” information about a major political candidate.
These are serious allegations and should be brought in a clear and professional manner. That’s just not what I’m getting from all this. You don’t drip it out slowly using an anonymous account on social media. You get as many facts as possible, present the evidence, and allow for anyone to bring new information and try to poke holes in the story. If Walz had sex with this guy when he was 14 then the guy needs to give an official statement saying Walz isn’t fit for office for these reasons and he needs to swear by them.
These are serious allegations and should be brought in a clear and professional manner. That’s just not what I’m getting from all this. You don’t drip it out slowly using an anonymous account on social media. You get as many facts as possible, present the evidence, and allow for anyone to bring new information and try to poke holes in the story. If Walz had sex with this guy when he was 14 then the guy needs to give an official statement saying Walz isn’t fit for office for these reasons and he needs to swear by them.
Page 11 of 23
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News