- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: CIA Releases Smoking Gun: Hillary, Soros Ordered Trump Hit
Posted on 7/31/25 at 12:38 pm to Bunk Moreland
Posted on 7/31/25 at 12:38 pm to Bunk Moreland
quote:
Solomon said this. Now, Petti, --- who I trust, said it looks like a lot of the info may be fake.
0
Posted on 7/31/25 at 12:38 pm to Placekicker
"What year is this?"
WUT?
(I'm just preparing y'all).
WUT?
(I'm just preparing y'all).
Posted on 7/31/25 at 12:38 pm to Paddyshack
quote:
Almost verbatim from every post you’ve made about this topic
No.
Again, what a fricking melt.
Posted on 7/31/25 at 12:39 pm to SallysHuman
Did she announce or waiting on a reporter to ask?
Posted on 7/31/25 at 12:40 pm to Placekicker
What sort of "hit"?
Posted on 7/31/25 at 12:41 pm to Placekicker
Hit as in the assassination attempt?
Posted on 7/31/25 at 12:41 pm to Arkaea79
quote:
I dont know if she said it but yes, government was in the black in June
Wow, I did not hear about that. That's amazing news. Not sure how I didn't know this. When was the last time that happened?
quote:
The last time the U.S. federal government had a budget surplus was in fiscal year 2001. This occurred during the final year of President Bill Clinton's second term. Following that, the U.S. has experienced consecutive budget deficits.
This post was edited on 7/31/25 at 12:42 pm
Posted on 7/31/25 at 12:41 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
No. Again, what a fricking melt.
Just quoting you. Again, almost verbatim.
Posted on 7/31/25 at 12:42 pm to Placekicker
Yeah but Epstein bros
Posted on 7/31/25 at 12:42 pm to Paddyshack
quote:
Just quoting you.
You are not.
But you do love to lie, so there's that.
Or, maybe, you just aren't capable of understand what is being discussed, but I was trying to give you the credit of being overly emotional instead of dumb.
Posted on 7/31/25 at 12:44 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What a random melt
Oh the irony.
Posted on 7/31/25 at 12:45 pm to JCdawg
quote:
Oh the irony.
Naw. I don't melt
Unless you're referencing the 2007 LSU loss to UK. I admit that was a melt.
Posted on 7/31/25 at 12:47 pm to SlowFlowPro
Bad memories. I melted harder over Arkansas that year, though. 
Posted on 7/31/25 at 12:48 pm to Placekicker
And nothing will happen to either of them
Posted on 7/31/25 at 12:48 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
And, for the retards, this isn't a defense of their actions. This is just me explaining they're all very covered legally and any prosecutions (without that smoking gun) are going to be very difficult. This is a "if you come at the King you best not miss" scenario for Trump, because trying these prosecutions, especially against Obama, and failing, would be disastrous for both Trump and MAGA (which includes any MAGA candidate running in 2028). They are almost assuredly going to get away with it. They were too smart and covered themselves legally. Melting down and projecting random conspiracies to get the emotions about Obama riled up runs the risk of making y'all look really bad, in the end.
Oh really?
Again, almost verbatim. Nice self admitted melt. Go self-flagellate.
This post was edited on 7/31/25 at 12:49 pm
Posted on 7/31/25 at 12:48 pm to Placekicker
Send out the drones for Soros.
Posted on 7/31/25 at 12:49 pm to Placekicker
you need to edit. I thought the title meant HIT as in the mob vernacular a hit on his life.
it doesn't help anyone to exaggerate wording it this way.
did i miss where she said anything but that the IC needs revamped?
it doesn't help anyone to exaggerate wording it this way.
did i miss where she said anything but that the IC needs revamped?
Posted on 7/31/25 at 12:49 pm to Placekicker
The walls are closing in on SFP
Posted on 7/31/25 at 12:49 pm to Bunk Moreland
Just to clarify, when I scanned through it the first time I felt more strongly that was Durham's conclusion than after reading it again.
I do read Durham's conclusion as being that the most intriguing emails were never sent. He says those that purport to be from the Soros exec are likely composites of a bunch of different emails/fragments of emails.
But, Durham notes the CIA originally determined they weren't fabrications. He also essentially says that the theme behind the emails - that Clinton had a plan to discredit Trump over Russia - is true. I'm not sure that part is really news to normal people, although to me it is interesting that a bunch of Carnegie/Soros groups were likely knee deep in it (not surprising, but interesting to have potential evidence of it).
That said, people are going to grab onto quotes like the FBI pouring oil on the fire, and if Russia is taking bits of emails and putting them together to make a coherent, believable whole, I'm not sure how we can put much faith in individual lines of them. Presumably there was a reason for concocting emails in the way Durham believes they were - my guess would be taking a bunch of more boring bits and pieces and putting them into a more compelling, explosive whole.
I do read Durham's conclusion as being that the most intriguing emails were never sent. He says those that purport to be from the Soros exec are likely composites of a bunch of different emails/fragments of emails.
But, Durham notes the CIA originally determined they weren't fabrications. He also essentially says that the theme behind the emails - that Clinton had a plan to discredit Trump over Russia - is true. I'm not sure that part is really news to normal people, although to me it is interesting that a bunch of Carnegie/Soros groups were likely knee deep in it (not surprising, but interesting to have potential evidence of it).
That said, people are going to grab onto quotes like the FBI pouring oil on the fire, and if Russia is taking bits of emails and putting them together to make a coherent, believable whole, I'm not sure how we can put much faith in individual lines of them. Presumably there was a reason for concocting emails in the way Durham believes they were - my guess would be taking a bunch of more boring bits and pieces and putting them into a more compelling, explosive whole.
Posted on 7/31/25 at 12:52 pm to BurlesonCountyAg
I continue to think SFP is right in this, that this likely too much gray area to build a winning prosecution knowing that the deck is stacked against us.
I hope that I'm wrong, because I do think there was a lot of wrongdoing involved.
I hope that I'm wrong, because I do think there was a lot of wrongdoing involved.
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News