- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Could McCarthy Take The Presidency After The Mid-Terms?
Posted on 4/1/22 at 2:07 am to BayouCatFan
Posted on 4/1/22 at 2:07 am to BayouCatFan
how is it anyone on TD doesnt yet understand it's a uniparty? they're all puppets with scripts.
1
Posted on 4/1/22 at 3:07 am to BayouCatFan
No stop the pipe dreams. No way Biden or Kamala are impeached or 25A
Posted on 4/1/22 at 7:13 am to Wednesday
quote:
The thought of McCarthy as speaker is revolting. We would rise Paul Ryan from the dead.
frick that lispy weird bastard. Him as president is no improvement.
He’s too much of a pussy to impeach Biden anyway. And it would be a waste of effort to have the HR change hands just to get stuck with that douche.
Yes, a Paul Ryan twin and Paul Ryan is a POS.
Posted on 4/1/22 at 7:15 am to BayouCatFan
Yes, but the deep state would never allow it.
Posted on 4/1/22 at 7:16 am to AubieinNC2009
Joe will be lucky to see 2024
Posted on 4/1/22 at 7:28 am to BayouCatFan
quote:
what are the chances they impeach Biden and somehow figure out a way to get rid of Kamala?
Zero.
Posted on 4/1/22 at 7:30 am to BayouCatFan
No one is asking if the current laws governing Presidential Succession are Constitutional.
A History of Predential Succession - begin at 49:50
A History of Predential Succession - begin at 49:50
This post was edited on 4/1/22 at 7:33 am
Posted on 4/1/22 at 7:31 am to AubieinNC2009
quote:
No stop the pipe dreams. No way Biden or Kamala are impeached or 25A
Tsk, tsk. Such a lack of vision...
Posted on 4/1/22 at 11:58 am to Deplorableinohio
quote:
First, Kevin McCarthy shouldn’t be speaker. Ever.
This is the correct response. He's Paul Ryan-lite.
Posted on 4/1/22 at 12:08 pm to BayouCatFan
no
Posted on 4/1/22 at 12:22 pm to BayouCatFan
quote:
Assuming Republicans take back the House and Senate, what are the chances they impeach Biden and somehow figure out a way to get rid of Kamala?
That’s called insurrection, and no, it’s probably not even possible.
Posted on 4/1/22 at 12:27 pm to FearlessFreep
quote:
From a policy perspective, would we be able to perceive a difference?
Maybe you wouldn’t be able to perceive a difference, but I think I’d notice a tremendous difference.
The Iran deal would be canceled.
We would not be sending stimulus checks to loafers.
We would no longer be appointing judges who legislate leftism from the bench.
There would be no tax increases proposed.
Foreign policy would be less ambitious and progress towards a one world government would slow, if not cease.
Let me ask, did you notice a difference when Biden took over for Trump?
Posted on 4/1/22 at 12:30 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
There is no possible way to get 67 votes in the Senate.
Right. Between the amoral Democrat and RINO senators, there is absolutely nothing The Big Guy could do to get convicted. Nothing.
Posted on 4/1/22 at 12:40 pm to arcalades
quote:
how is it anyone on TD doesnt yet understand it's a uniparty? they're all puppets with scripts.
this guy gets it...
maybe 40-60% of the republican party actually try to solve problems...100% of democrats try to create problems...
in short. we're fricked...
Posted on 4/1/22 at 12:58 pm to TigerFan55555
quote:
in short. we're fricked...
Sure would've been nice if Trump and his baws would've seen this coming, right?
Posted on 4/1/22 at 1:52 pm to VoxDawg
Your unhinged diatribe from the NYTimes thread not long ago...
If you truly are so sure with insider information there is no need to say you are comfy AF and spam post Devolution links on this board, no? If Devolution could stand on it's own merit- in it's own thread (It could not-been there done that) There would be no need to spam, troll, shitpost the board with sneaky devolution links, no?
quote:
I'm not making any assertions one way or another. The thread is about the NYT saying that Q's posts were made by Ron Watkins and/or Paul Furber.
My point is that whether or not the premise is true (hint: It's not), the "coincidence" is pretty remarkable that to my research, there's only two drops out of nearly 5,000 which have #truth in them, and only one from Q. (The other was Q responding to an anon who included #truth in their post - and that one was #2879, the next day on Feb 22, 2019). Mathematically, it a fun one to consider.
My question was if it *were* true, wouldn't it be an even more remote chance from a probability standpoint that someone like Watkins or Furber would have #Truth in the post 3 years to the day ahead of the release of Trump's social media platform of the same name than if Q is the insider that many believe?
So many of you want to sling mud at Q because you want some Magic 8-Ball where you're given permission to believe because the shot is called. (Not you, Decatur. You're liberal filth of the highest order and the swamp draining that Trump has promised is your worst nightmare. Cocoa, coloring books and a safe space for you). Q isn't about telling folks "This thing, X, is going to happen on MM-DD-YYY." That's not going to happen, for myriad reasons, not the least of which that we're in the midst of an information war. If we know what happens when, then THEY know what happens when, and the DS could/would respond accordingly.
The simple fact that not everyone can grasp this important distinction is a significant dividing line between those who consider Q's message and those who jeer from the peanut gallery.
quote:
No one is asking if the current laws governing Presidential Succession are Constitutional.
A History of Predential Succession - begin at 49:50
quote:I am waiting for the poster Tader Salad to sign in and call you unhinged. Tsk Tsk if he doesn't.
Tsk, tsk. Such a lack of vision...
If you truly are so sure with insider information there is no need to say you are comfy AF and spam post Devolution links on this board, no? If Devolution could stand on it's own merit- in it's own thread (It could not-been there done that) There would be no need to spam, troll, shitpost the board with sneaky devolution links, no?
Posted on 4/1/22 at 1:53 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
Sure would've been nice if Trump and his baws would've seen this coming, right?
no doubt, what pisses me off is he still shows he hasn't learned his lesson... he endorsed the establishment RINO Wesley Hunt in my district in texas and I was livid... Many of us over here knew he was a damn democrat in republican clothing... but the idiot republicans only saw "former apache helicopter pilot" or "Black Republican" and voted for him... fricking idiots.. he voted for Obama, that will tell you all you need to know about him...
Posted on 4/1/22 at 2:10 pm to BayouCatFan
Biden will ignore Congress and rule by decree.
Posted on 4/1/22 at 2:25 pm to cajunangelle
Why would Tader call ME unhinged? I could totally see him saying that about you, since you have shifted focus to trying to poke holes in the Devolution theory, now that you don't have the mean, ol' Q boogeyman to castigate. (Your implication being that Tader's account is some alter profile, since obviously I'm the only person on the whole of TD who thinks there's some fire to the smoke of the Devolution research shared here?)
Some lib filth admin deleting the Government in Exile thread does not invalidate the information that was in it.
Unless you're saying you place ultimate faith in the editorial decisions made by admins/owners of a football message board, rather than relevant analysis of actual Executive Orders and policy documents enacted by Trump, whose existence is not negotiable.
Your determination that my posts using some of Dev-related content as an explanation to questions others raise here on *gasp* a discussion board is spam is laughable.
Some lib filth admin deleting the Government in Exile thread does not invalidate the information that was in it.
Unless you're saying you place ultimate faith in the editorial decisions made by admins/owners of a football message board, rather than relevant analysis of actual Executive Orders and policy documents enacted by Trump, whose existence is not negotiable.
Your determination that my posts using some of Dev-related content as an explanation to questions others raise here on *gasp* a discussion board is spam is laughable.
Posted on 4/1/22 at 2:27 pm to BayouCatFan
I only know two people that think this
You're not from Mar a Lago also are you?
You're not from Mar a Lago also are you?
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News