- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Dems will win mid-terms with historic gains
Posted on 7/13/25 at 1:02 pm to 1putt
Posted on 7/13/25 at 1:02 pm to 1putt
So what the OP is saying is that a questionable “covering” for some pedophile that we aren’t privy to many of the details is worthy of allowing those who are overtly for pedophilia and other debauchery and mismanagement of government to take back over to teach a lesson??? Makes no sense but whatever!
0
Posted on 7/13/25 at 1:05 pm to nealnan8
Yeah as I said at the beginning of this thread/shitswow the Democrat Party is in such disarray that they may actually have more incumbents lose. in fact I predict that they have more incumbents lose in the primary challenges that everybody focuses on
esp with fact Trump will be endorsing most of the GOP incumbents
the democratic party doesn't control itself at this point
and that is happening on the city level within the democrat party around the country
You can look at the DA's race in Los Angeles County the mayors race in Houston, what's going on in Chicago What's going on in New York
there's is a local level better on the dem party ,, In the long run the smart thing would be getting stuff done especially the stuff that they care about the most like immigration the LBGQ shite... there long term winning is we just go far enough,,, that We still 15% of the Democrat vote and twenty percent of it just stays home in
mass winning with that strategy
the indictment of the mayor in san francisco the recall of the mayor in Oakland
elon should be putting money into those races just to disrupt the democrat party that would give him the biggest payoff with trump
esp with fact Trump will be endorsing most of the GOP incumbents
the democratic party doesn't control itself at this point
and that is happening on the city level within the democrat party around the country
You can look at the DA's race in Los Angeles County the mayors race in Houston, what's going on in Chicago What's going on in New York
there's is a local level better on the dem party ,, In the long run the smart thing would be getting stuff done especially the stuff that they care about the most like immigration the LBGQ shite... there long term winning is we just go far enough,,, that We still 15% of the Democrat vote and twenty percent of it just stays home in
mass winning with that strategy
the indictment of the mayor in san francisco the recall of the mayor in Oakland
elon should be putting money into those races just to disrupt the democrat party that would give him the biggest payoff with trump
Posted on 7/13/25 at 1:08 pm to nealnan8
I agree 100%. I will never vote for another Democrat again and even if I have to hold my nose to vote against them I will. I truly believe that if they ever get control again our country as we know it will be destroyed.
Posted on 7/13/25 at 1:12 pm to 1putt
The dimocratix party is STILL for:
1) Illegals, and bankrolling illegals in the hundreds of billions
2) Soft on crime
3) The gender hoax, and boys competing in girls’ sports
4) Wasting craptons of money on completely bizarre endeavors
All these positions are roundly opposed by the vast majority of the country, and that’s what will keep it competitive.
1) Illegals, and bankrolling illegals in the hundreds of billions
2) Soft on crime
3) The gender hoax, and boys competing in girls’ sports
4) Wasting craptons of money on completely bizarre endeavors
All these positions are roundly opposed by the vast majority of the country, and that’s what will keep it competitive.
Posted on 7/13/25 at 1:12 pm to exdemocrat
I just may start a
I may ask Gronk to produce a chicken owl hybrid, and that will be the podcast logo
Any of y'all that actually wanted to learn might listen in
quote:podcast to start explaining this to yall
TD. Politard
I may ask Gronk to produce a chicken owl hybrid, and that will be the podcast logo
Any of y'all that actually wanted to learn might listen in
Posted on 7/13/25 at 1:15 pm to HonoraryCoonass
quote:
The dimocratix party is STILL for:
1) Illegals, and bankrolling illegals in the hundreds of billions
2) Soft on crime
3) The gender hoax, and boys competing in girls’ sports
4) Wasting craptons of money on completely bizarre endeavors
And they are aware of it and trying to fight it it's interesting So in every Democrat stronghold the Democrat Party is having a fight for control and it is often breaking down on these exact lines
California as I noted in my examples is getting less progressive Not gonna say less liberal but less progressive at least according to the recalls and elections But it's small,, 2007-8 Tea Party type stuff
Only a lot more violent, And it's all totally what y'all would expect
the Harris County /Houston fight is very interesting ,, old school political street fight.. like The Mob vs the Unions
This post was edited on 7/13/25 at 1:18 pm
Posted on 7/13/25 at 1:19 pm to 1putt
quote:
I couldn't really care less about some poor person getting benifits they don't "deserve". Nancy Pelosi steals more money in a single insider trade than these people possible could their whole lives.
Did you miss the thread showing it’s costing taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars in Texas alone? You don’t care about that at all? And they don’t deserve a single cent of taxpayer money.
Posted on 7/13/25 at 1:22 pm to 1putt
Why would any sane person vote for a democrat?
Posted on 7/13/25 at 1:33 pm to OWLFAN86
Since World War II, the president’s party has lost an average of 26 seats in midterms.
Among 19 midterm elections from 1946–2018, only two (1934 under FDR, and 2002 under George W. Bush) saw the president’s party gain seats.
The president’s party also typically loses Senate seats, averaging 4 seats lost at each midterm.
Senate gains by the president’s party are rare and usually limited to 1–2 seats in exceptional circumstances.
Among 19 midterm elections from 1946–2018, only two (1934 under FDR, and 2002 under George W. Bush) saw the president’s party gain seats.
The president’s party also typically loses Senate seats, averaging 4 seats lost at each midterm.
Senate gains by the president’s party are rare and usually limited to 1–2 seats in exceptional circumstances.
This post was edited on 7/13/25 at 1:34 pm
Posted on 7/13/25 at 1:35 pm to 1putt
quote:
Period! I'm not voting for them either.
There isn’t a single person you could ever vote for that would release an Epstein client list.
Posted on 7/13/25 at 1:40 pm to 1putt
If the Democratic Party was sane, you might have a point. They want to let grown men shower with your daughters. No way in Hell they win the Senate. If anything, they may lose enough to give the GOP a 60 vote majority.
Posted on 7/13/25 at 1:40 pm to 4cubbies
so your party is is full loss of credibility or decency. And they still lose
the party is in full meli down civil war, and the city level
And it wasn't a straith white man that did it to yall
there arent left enough to do enough damage to the democrat party by the obamma legacy
lol my stroke showed up in that bullshite
the party is in full meli down civil war, and the city level
And it wasn't a straith white man that did it to yall
there arent left enough to do enough damage to the democrat party by the obamma legacy
lol my stroke showed up in that bullshite
This post was edited on 7/13/25 at 2:02 pm
Posted on 7/13/25 at 1:45 pm to 1putt
Are you going straight communist
Posted on 7/13/25 at 3:42 pm to OWLFAN86
quote:
so your party is is full loss of credibility or decency. And they still lose
I don’t have a party. I simply posted historical trends.
Posted on 7/13/25 at 4:48 pm to 1putt
Dems ain’t winning shite for the next 20 yr there done
Posted on 7/13/25 at 4:52 pm to HonoraryCoonass
quote:
Wasting craptons of money on completely bizarre endeavors
The “Green New Scam” billions wasted, embezzled, stolen, misappropriated on this nonsense.
It was nothing more than a money laundering scheme by Biden and crew
Posted on 7/13/25 at 5:38 pm to FluffyBunnyFeet
It's not close the majority view. There is a part of the MAGA base, it's not all of it, that really doesn't understand civics, has strong views on a lot of conspiracies and thinks their voice is THE voice of the party. It's a sort of collective Charles J. Guiteau type mass psychosis. Guiteau killed POTUS Garfield after he was brushed aside after Garfield won.
Guiteau though he had a major role in the victory and was certain he was owned. The Epstein clique seems to feel they are owed and by damn a list will be produced and it will show they were right...about what...no one seems to know.
Guiteau though he had a major role in the victory and was certain he was owned. The Epstein clique seems to feel they are owed and by damn a list will be produced and it will show they were right...about what...no one seems to know.
Posted on 7/13/25 at 6:23 pm to ole man
quote:I remember democrats saying this about republicans after Obama’s 2008 election.
Dems ain’t winning shite for the next 20 yr there done
Page 10 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News