- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 1/4/26 at 9:37 am to VOR
Goalposts moved
Posted on 1/4/26 at 9:43 am to CDawson
Even if it could be done with no risk of leaks Congressional approval would still involve this:
Dem Senator Foghorn: 'Mr. President, I'm considering supporting your military operation. But I'm wondering if you got my message about our state building a giant zoo for underpriveleged children. We would only need $75 Milion from a federal grant to start construction.'
Multiply this times at least 50 other members of Congress and Trump would get approval sometime in February.....of 2027.
Dem Senator Foghorn: 'Mr. President, I'm considering supporting your military operation. But I'm wondering if you got my message about our state building a giant zoo for underpriveleged children. We would only need $75 Milion from a federal grant to start construction.'
Multiply this times at least 50 other members of Congress and Trump would get approval sometime in February.....of 2027.
Posted on 1/4/26 at 9:46 am to CDawson
ever since LBJ, the media gives Democrats a pass on breaking the rules of war. Ground level Democrats were silent for 12 years on Obama/Biden and then Biden/Harris blowing half the world up. But they'll be out in multitudes tomorrow protesting and pretending to be "anti war"
Biden sent 2,000 American soldiers into Syria a year ago, during Christmas, and worked with ISIS and Al Queda to oust Assad, the guy who allowed Christians to live in peace in Syria. And...you could hear a pin drop. The media did not give a rat's arse.
Same on Yemen. Obama/Biden triggered that war for Saudi Arabia, and then the media allowed Biden to campaign "against the war in Yemen."
But, same old story, propagandists will carpet bomb planet earth with this move on Venezuela and all the little leftist liars will be filming themselves protesting "their Vietnam"
Does that mean it was okay for Trump to go in without congressional approval? frick no. It's unconstitutional. I know that's hard for most of you dipshits to understand.The elitists of both parties are on the same side behind closed doors, laughing their asses off. That's why Trump once said to us, "They don't hate me. They hate you."
Trump and Bondi and whoever will be doing sweeping crushing gun control on us in the next couple of years. Just watch.
Biden sent 2,000 American soldiers into Syria a year ago, during Christmas, and worked with ISIS and Al Queda to oust Assad, the guy who allowed Christians to live in peace in Syria. And...you could hear a pin drop. The media did not give a rat's arse.
Same on Yemen. Obama/Biden triggered that war for Saudi Arabia, and then the media allowed Biden to campaign "against the war in Yemen."
But, same old story, propagandists will carpet bomb planet earth with this move on Venezuela and all the little leftist liars will be filming themselves protesting "their Vietnam"
Does that mean it was okay for Trump to go in without congressional approval? frick no. It's unconstitutional. I know that's hard for most of you dipshits to understand.The elitists of both parties are on the same side behind closed doors, laughing their asses off. That's why Trump once said to us, "They don't hate me. They hate you."
Trump and Bondi and whoever will be doing sweeping crushing gun control on us in the next couple of years. Just watch.
This post was edited on 1/4/26 at 9:53 am
Posted on 1/4/26 at 9:52 am to CDawson
You bring up a damn strong counterpoint.
Posted on 1/4/26 at 9:55 am to VOR
Tell that to the Biden regime who placed the exact same bounty on Maduro that was placed on Bin Laden by Bush.
Posted on 1/4/26 at 9:56 am to CDawson
1989 Just Cause some in congress were notified and Noriega knew we were coming, he wasn't home when Delta came knocking and SEAL Team 4 had a couple of platoons walk into waiting trap at Patilla air field 4 dead many wounded some catastrophically. So telling congress is moot... Noriega knew we were coming.
Imagine if Pakistan a nuclear power thought we were invading them.
Imagine if Pakistan a nuclear power thought we were invading them.
Posted on 1/4/26 at 9:57 am to VOR
quote:
Madura =/ Bin.Laden. The overall circumstances were not comparable, and everyone with a functioning brain knows it…
Osama didn’t personally kill over 3,000 Americans in terror attacks in 1993, 1998, 2000, and 2001 but he funded it.
Maduro didn’t kill an exponentially higher number of Americans in drug overdoses but he funded it.
I’m not saying Maduro was a more imminent threat to Americans, but if we’re talking about justification, Maduro’s threat to American citizens was no less serious than the one Osama posed.
This post was edited on 1/4/26 at 10:05 am
Posted on 1/4/26 at 9:58 am to CDawson
Congressional approval is a red herring. A big fat red herring. Congress need only approve a formal declaration of war, which hasn’t happened since WWII. Congressional notification is needed in certain circumstances but not prior to the operation in most cases.
We need to push back on the media driven lie that the CIC needs congressional permission to run the military.
We need to push back on the media driven lie that the CIC needs congressional permission to run the military.
Posted on 1/4/26 at 10:00 am to tiger1014
quote:
A head of state of a foreign country vs a terrorist
He’s a dictator that was voted out but refused to leave. He jailed and killed citizens and politicians that opposed him…. I thought you supported the no kings protest?
Posted on 1/4/26 at 10:01 am to TDsngumbo
Don’t entertain this nonsense. The perpetrators don’t have to be the same in order to use the same legal mechanisms for capture.
Besides, there’s plenty more precedent for this type of operation, like Noriega, etc.
Besides, there’s plenty more precedent for this type of operation, like Noriega, etc.
Posted on 1/4/26 at 10:02 am to CDawson
I've been told Biden was not the elected leader and yet somehow he ran the government for 4 years and the military never stormed the White House to grab him
Posted on 1/4/26 at 10:05 am to Brosef Stalin
No man. 30 seconds after the election was called by CNN, we were told over and over again, with no evidence or examination whatsoever, that it was the most secure election in US history and any suggestion that it wasn’t was labeled “the big lie”.
Posted on 1/4/26 at 10:14 am to CDawson
In a country that we were not in conflict with either one could add
Posted on 1/4/26 at 10:25 am to tiger1014
quote:
A head of state of a foreign country vs a terrorist
He was not the head of state of Venezuela. Machado was.
Posted on 1/4/26 at 10:29 am to tiger1014
quote:
A head of state of a foreign country vs a terrorist
Who was officially labeled as a Narco-terrorist by everyone outside of Venezuela..
Posted on 1/4/26 at 10:29 am to CDawson
He didn't need to "get' approval because it had already been granted under the 2001 AUMF passed by Congress after 9/11. That authorization explicitly covered al-Qaeda and its leadership.
Posted on 1/4/26 at 10:35 am to tiger1014
quote:
Yall assume anyone who doesn’t cheer the echo chamber is a democrat communist tds
Any usually we are right
Posted on 1/4/26 at 10:36 am to tiger1014
quote:Terrible argument when the answer is Obama had pre-existing congressional authorization passed after 9/11.
You’re fricking retarded
A head of state of a foreign country vs a terrorist
EXACT same thing
Posted on 1/4/26 at 10:38 am to CDawson
that was different, it set up the trap that later killed a bunch of seals in Afghanistan that Biden botched
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News