- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: European liberals are big time about the US sinking an Iranian ship.
Posted on 3/4/26 at 4:54 pm to WeeWee
Posted on 3/4/26 at 4:54 pm to WeeWee
quote:
I love how he called the Iranian ship and unsuspecting ship.
Word to the wise: If your country is swapping missile launches with other countries, and your country is steadily being blown to bits with with air and naval attacks, you might want to stay at battle stations for a while.
Posted on 3/4/26 at 4:58 pm to Ag Zwin
quote:
I love how he called the Iranian ship and unsuspecting ship. Word to the wise: If your country is swapping missile launches with other countries, and your country is steadily being blown to bits with with air and naval attacks, you might want to stay at battle stations for a while.
Yep. There is no way that Iranian ship didn’t have people listening to sonar.
Posted on 3/4/26 at 5:02 pm to BOHICAMAN
It would be ironic if we invaded and conquered the United Kingdom on the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence. Ben Franklin would get a kick out of that.
Posted on 3/4/26 at 5:37 pm to PsychTiger
quote:
So we just let one of their naval ships return home to fight us?
It was less than 1,000 miles from Diego Garcia, we supposed to allow it time to fire on Diego Garcia?
Posted on 3/4/26 at 5:43 pm to WeeWee
How unsuspecting can a ship be from a country that is under attack, and returning to home country to join the fight?
How retarded are people these days?
How retarded are people these days?
This post was edited on 3/4/26 at 5:47 pm
Posted on 3/4/26 at 5:43 pm to WeeWee
quote:
There is no way that Iranian ship didn’t have people listening to sonar.
Posted on 3/4/26 at 5:44 pm to PsychTiger
quote:
So we just let one of their naval ships return home to fight us?
Yes and hopefully prevail in the eyes of liberal filth.
Posted on 3/4/26 at 5:59 pm to theballguy
quote:
Geez when did western europeans become such pussies?
They've always been.
You must have missed the part of history when the Grande Armee was the scourge of the continent. And they mostly completed their attacks with bayonets.
Posted on 3/4/26 at 6:01 pm to SWINC
quote:
These are the same clowns who dressed soldiers in bright colors and stood in a line to fight
That’s the same way they won the Battle of Waterloo.
Posted on 3/4/26 at 6:36 pm to WeeWee
Hey Toumas be nice and maybe we will throw you a life preserver as your country sinks into Muslim control.
Posted on 3/4/26 at 6:41 pm to WeeWee
In my 30 years of military experience, I found that "unsuspecting" enemy combatants were the very best ones to attack!!!
This post was edited on 3/4/26 at 6:42 pm
Posted on 3/4/26 at 6:50 pm to WeeWee
quote:
You know, who conducted such cowardly attacks on unsuspecting naval targets before you? Nazi Germany.
... And the US Navy... During WW2...
Because... It was a warship...
Duhhh
Posted on 3/4/26 at 7:07 pm to WeeWee
The British sank the Argentinian ship General Bellgrano outside the exclusion zone in International waters in the Falkland Islands war.
You don’t allow your enemy a sanctuary.
As to the European pussies, war isn’t a fricking game. Iran could have avoided this.
A belligerent is.an appropriate target.
You don’t allow your enemy a sanctuary.
As to the European pussies, war isn’t a fricking game. Iran could have avoided this.
A belligerent is.an appropriate target.
Posted on 3/5/26 at 9:24 pm to Penrod
Yeah but they were fighting gay pansies
Posted on 3/6/26 at 5:16 am to SWINC
quote:
Yeah but they were fighting gay pansies
I hope you don’t really believe that. Those “gay pansies” carried cold steel into the enemy lines. They stood under discipline as canon balls ripped through their columns. They slept in freezing conditions out in the open.
Since the American Civil War, no American military has ever had to evince that kind of fortitude. As late as WW1 the British and European armies suffered horrifying casualties that America hasn’t seen since the nineteenth century.
Go look at the roster of the defenders of the Alamo - it’s a bunch of Scotsman for the most part. These were the people who made up Wellington’s infantry.
The two world wars broke those nations, but up until WW2, those were some of the toughest people in the world.
Posted on 3/6/26 at 5:49 am to WeeWee
Remember the Cole
This post was edited on 3/6/26 at 5:51 am
Posted on 3/6/26 at 6:04 am to WeeWee
quote:
US sinking an Iranian ship
Muh “international waters” figs are squawking.
It’s a made up rule applied against the USA primarily that means nothing.
This post was edited on 3/6/26 at 10:59 am
Posted on 3/6/26 at 6:25 am to WeeWee
quote:
European liberals are big time about the US sinking an Iranian ship.
I don’t know why anyone should care what European liberals think.
Popular
Back to top

1








