Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Google search “Eric Garner criminal history” | Page 5 | Political Talk
Started By
Message

re: Google search “Eric Garner criminal history”

Posted on 7/20/19 at 10:46 pm to
Posted by Trevaylin
south texas
Member since Feb 2019
10270 posts
Posted on 7/20/19 at 10:46 pm to
have done this comparison several times with similar results
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
62838 posts
Posted on 7/20/19 at 10:49 pm to
quote:

Asthma attack and restraint/positional asphyxiation.
Sure. No one is disputing the physical modality. But neither of those modalities would have been in play had he peacefully cuffed up.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
127260 posts
Posted on 7/20/19 at 10:56 pm to
You’re playing a game and you look stupid.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
127260 posts
Posted on 7/20/19 at 10:58 pm to
quote:

But neither of those modalities would have been in play had he peacefully cuffed up.


Sure. But any resisting of arrest doesn’t mean officers can use deadly force with impunity. You know that. You just don’t want that to be true.
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 7/20/19 at 11:01 pm to
quote:

But neither of those modalities would have been in play had he peacefully cuffed up.


Officers used deadly force over cigarettes man.

The person with authority and power has more responsibility and expectation to deescalate the situation than the civilian.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
58252 posts
Posted on 7/20/19 at 11:11 pm to
quote:

You’re playing a game and you look stupid.


I’m asking for source documents. Why would that make me look stupid? What a silly statement. Clearly you haven’t read source documents. That is disappointing, because you seemed so sure on the facts. Now I know you don’t have the facts.
Posted by Mayor
Member since Jul 2019
45 posts
Posted on 7/20/19 at 11:14 pm to
quote:

It wasn't a chokehold/chokehold. He died later.
med examiner and independent investigator appointed by PD said it was.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
127260 posts
Posted on 7/20/19 at 11:16 pm to
Tell me what’s being editorialized in the article I linked.

Specifically on the cause of death since that’s the focal point.

quote:

“Compression of neck (choke hold), compression of chest and prone positioning during physical restraint by police.”


If you don’t like her medical opinion, you can say “I still think it’s cool they killed him.” Quit dithering.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
58252 posts
Posted on 7/20/19 at 11:27 pm to
quote:

Tell me what’s being editorialized in the article I linked.


Have you ever been in a courtroom? Would you ever take the questioning of one party’s attorneys without looking at the questioning of the others? I want to read the entire exchange. Taking one question out of the entire testimony is idiotic. I don’t know a thing about the case, but if were litigating it I can think of 10 follow up questions to that one answer you provided. I just want to read the entire exchange. Clearly you aren’t interested in anything but your confirmation bias. Your bias may be 100 percent correct, but to call someone dithering and stupid for simply asking for a complete record....is silly. You are not as smart as I had originally given you credit for if you couldn’t figure that out on your own. Good lord man.
This post was edited on 7/20/19 at 11:31 pm
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
62838 posts
Posted on 7/21/19 at 12:50 am to
quote:

Sure. But any resisting of arrest doesn’t mean officers can use deadly force with impunity.
Who said they did?

The logic trap here is... if we’re going to say that prohibited conduct (chokehold) by the police officer makes the officer responsible for Garner’s death, why wouldn’t Garner’s prohibited behavior (resisting lawful arrest) make him responsible for his death?

quote:

You know that. You just don’t want that to be true.
Can you tell me what I'm thinking about having for a late night snack?
This post was edited on 7/21/19 at 1:43 am
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
62838 posts
Posted on 7/21/19 at 12:51 am to
quote:

The person with authority and power has more responsibility and expectation to deescalate the situation than the civilian.
I guess they should just let people go that resist.

Clearly, Garner should could never have anticipated a physical altercation when he decided to resist arrest. He fought the cops, they fought back. Who coulda known?
This post was edited on 7/21/19 at 1:04 am
Posted by trinidadtiger
Member since Jun 2017
19281 posts
Posted on 7/21/19 at 4:23 am to
quote:

He was selling loose cigarettes. Wasn't that the justification for the stop? Limiting government requires these nanny state type of laws that result in increased police encounters to end.



Doesnt the fella who owns the store, in front of which a 350 lb known criminal was working his trade, have rights as well? Ya think????
Posted by TenWheelsForJesus
Member since Jan 2018
10757 posts
Posted on 7/21/19 at 5:13 am to
quote:

It wasn't a chokehold/chokehold.


Like it wasn't rape/rape?
Posted by Possumslayer
Pascagoula
Member since Jan 2018
6474 posts
Posted on 7/21/19 at 5:19 am to
He killed his self resisting arrest...facts
Posted by CarrolltonTiger
New Orleans
Member since Aug 2005
50291 posts
Posted on 7/21/19 at 8:08 am to
quote:

That other stuff is irrelevant


So Google determines what is relevant and irrelevant for the searcher? The search was for the criminal history of the individual -- it wasn't provided and it obviously exists on the internet.
Posted by MoarKilometers
Member since Apr 2015
20908 posts
Posted on 7/21/19 at 8:21 am to
quote:

As is resisting arrest by state law.

Which states is this considered a capital offense by statute
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 7/21/19 at 8:24 am to
quote:

Which states is this considered a capital offense by statute



So how come hundreds of people since haven't died as a result of whatever the cops did here?

He died because he was a sick person who resisted the cops. If either of those had not been true he would not have died.

so fricking simple, have no idea why it takes 5 fricking pages

Posted by MoarKilometers
Member since Apr 2015
20908 posts
Posted on 7/21/19 at 8:39 am to
quote:

So how come hundreds of people since haven't died as a result of whatever the cops did here?

I mean my local cops paid out on a wrongful death lawsuit since this death that involved the exact same quote of "i can't breathe." They also didn't follow department protocol, but no charges filed. My county is under 200k people, so I imagine it has also happened other places as well.
Posted by HoganGidley
Member since Jul 2019
61 posts
Posted on 7/21/19 at 9:16 am to
So he deserves the death penalty for seeking loosies, sounds about right from dumb Trump misfit supporters
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 7/21/19 at 9:39 am to
quote:

Homicide


That is a technical term meaning it was not a death by natural causes or accident?
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram