Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Insuring pre-existing conditions | Page 4 | Political Talk
Started By
Message

re: Insuring pre-existing conditions

Posted on 5/10/14 at 5:31 pm to
Posted by MMauler
Primary This RINO Traitor
Member since Jun 2013
24164 posts
Posted on 5/10/14 at 5:31 pm to
quote:

I pay taxes to help subsidize your employer paying for your healthcare. Is that also theft?


Incentivizing employers to provide healthcare coverage in the form of PAYING less taxes is not theft. Forcing someone to subsidize the healthcare cost of an abled bodied person who CHOOSES not to work is THEFT.
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46671 posts
Posted on 5/10/14 at 5:38 pm to
quote:

I am elected President Zach. I do an executive order that anyone with the initials RK shall have all of his property taxed and given to the poor.


This would be illegal in about a dozen different ways, but it wouldnt be theft.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
136690 posts
Posted on 5/10/14 at 5:40 pm to
quote:

This would be illegal in about a dozen different ways, but it wouldnt be theft
Taking your money/property illegally isn't theft?
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46671 posts
Posted on 5/10/14 at 5:50 pm to
Would such an act be charged as theft?
Posted by Qwerty
Member since Dec 2010
2114 posts
Posted on 5/10/14 at 5:52 pm to
quote:

This would be illegal in about a dozen different ways, but it wouldnt be theft.



quote:

Would such an act be charged as theft?


So because the government takes it, it can't be theft? Because the government kills innocent civilians it can't be murder?

I don't base my morality on what the government or society deems right or wrong.
This post was edited on 5/10/14 at 6:30 pm
Posted by Qwerty
Member since Dec 2010
2114 posts
Posted on 5/10/14 at 7:01 pm to
quote:

Would such an act be charged as theft?


I'm genuinely curious if you're being intentionally obtuse or if it just comes naturally.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
58185 posts
Posted on 5/10/14 at 7:25 pm to
This is the fundamental difference in ideology. Rex thinks income is the governments property and any amount not taxed is welfare. Sane people think keeping their own earned income is not welfare.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
58185 posts
Posted on 5/10/14 at 7:26 pm to
Look up louisiana's definition of theft. 14:67.
Posted by The Veldt
Member since May 2013
822 posts
Posted on 5/10/14 at 8:04 pm to
quote:

Forcing someone to subsidize the healthcare cost of an abled bodied person who CHOOSES not to work is THEFT.
subsidizing healthcare costs for those with pre-existing conditions through ACA is mostly geared towards those who are not able bodied. I'm not trying to suggest they can't work but their physical productivity is not on par with someone like you and me.
Posted by TerryDawg03
The Deep South
Member since Dec 2012
17763 posts
Posted on 5/10/14 at 9:10 pm to
I love the irony of those wanting insurance for pre-existing conditions. If they truly got what they asked for, their premiums would go through the roof, given that bitch of a concept called statistics.

The vast majority of the American people are too damn stupid for their own good.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
62813 posts
Posted on 5/10/14 at 9:52 pm to
quote:

You sure could. You'd get no customers
Exactly my point
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
62813 posts
Posted on 5/10/14 at 9:54 pm to
quote:

the very definition of taxation prevents it from being theft.
just because government sanctions it... Doesn't mean it isn't theft. Let's not forget who writes the law.
Posted by McLemore
Member since Dec 2003
35046 posts
Posted on 5/10/14 at 10:50 pm to
quote:

Not insurance.


perfect answer.
Posted by McLemore
Member since Dec 2003
35046 posts
Posted on 5/10/14 at 10:51 pm to
quote:

just because government sanctions it... Doesn't mean it isn't theft


well, it sort of does. not all bad takings are theft.
Posted by McLemore
Member since Dec 2003
35046 posts
Posted on 5/10/14 at 10:52 pm to
quote:

I don't base my morality on what the government or society deems right or wrong.


right but morals and crimes are no coextensive. a thing can be immoral and be legal and moral and be illegal.
Posted by uway
Member since Sep 2004
33109 posts
Posted on 5/10/14 at 11:04 pm to
It's obviously impossible. Can't have affordable "insurance" that covers preexisting conditions.
Posted by Qwerty
Member since Dec 2010
2114 posts
Posted on 5/10/14 at 11:04 pm to
quote:

a thing can be immoral and be legal and moral and be illegal


That was my point. Hence why it can be theft even if sanctioned by the government.
This post was edited on 5/10/14 at 11:07 pm
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
62813 posts
Posted on 5/10/14 at 11:17 pm to
quote:

well, it sort of does. not all bad takings are theft.
Indeed. As I said...

quote:

Paying taxes for public goods is not theft. Paying taxes for another's personal expenses... is straight up theft.
Posted by LeonPhelps
Member since May 2008
8185 posts
Posted on 5/10/14 at 11:25 pm to
No, and I have one. It makes no sense for the insurer to insure me under a normal plan. I have no right to health insurance. It is not an entitlement. Health insurers are private organizations and should have the right to refuse service for any reason whatsoever, especially if they are losing money on the contract right out of the gate.

Because of Obamacare, my new health insurer is losing over $5,000 on me annually right out of the gate, and that is assuming no complications.

A plan that would make sense for an insurer for ensure me is a plan where the deductible is at least $5,000 and they cover very little - just a backstop to avoid me going bankrupt should something happen. I would get that plan up to a pretty hefty premium.
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 5/11/14 at 12:13 am to
quote:

I wish people could stick to the topic without resorting to asinine irrelevance.



You dumbass, that is exactly analogous.

"Insurance" is a hedge against something that hasn't happened yet. "Insurance against pre-existing conditions" is getting someone else to pay for your known medical problem."

I wish people could avoid being stupid.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram