- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jim and John Respond to Tulsi
Posted on 7/30/25 at 9:31 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Posted on 7/30/25 at 9:31 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Good post, mate.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
0
Posted on 7/30/25 at 9:36 pm to Bronco11
That’s directly opposite the Senate Intelligence Committee Report.
Posted on 7/30/25 at 9:38 pm to boosiebadazz
Idiot
Posted on 7/30/25 at 9:46 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
That’s directly opposite the Senate Intelligence Committee Report.
You think that because you're illiterate. We've been through this.
Posted on 7/30/25 at 9:46 pm to Turbeauxdog
Posted on 7/30/25 at 9:48 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
Is it really the BIGGEST SCANDAL EVER that Obama asked the IC to detail Russian interference and attempted influence?
I’m just here to remind everyone that boosie is the same poster that mocked Louisiana citizens for trying to organize a recall against jbe instead of relying on their shitty elected officials to do their jobs, then was nowhere to be found when the shitty elected officials finally did their jobs over a year later only to be overruled by an activist judge that boosie supports.
Posted on 7/30/25 at 9:49 pm to boosiebadazz
Dp
This post was edited on 7/30/25 at 9:50 pm
Posted on 7/30/25 at 9:50 pm to boosiebadazz
Do you get tired and yawn when you try and fail to think?
Posted on 7/30/25 at 9:51 pm to Turbeauxdog
I get tired of reading your lame arse, recycled ad hom nonsense.
Just get better material.
Just get better material.
Posted on 7/30/25 at 9:56 pm to boosiebadazz
You’ve always been a big Brennan and Clapper guy
Posted on 7/30/25 at 10:01 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
A crony of then-Director of National Intelligence (DNI) James Clapper threatened to withhold a promotion from a senior intelligence official unless he concurred in the fake Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) on Russia’s meddling in the 2016 election, notes obtained exclusively by The Federalist show.
The notes made public for the first time today recount a conversation the top analyst in the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) had with an unnamed superior who worked closely with the then-Director James Clapper, according to sources familiar with the document.
The release of the notes represents the latest cache of documents declassified by the Trump administration official concerning the ICA that outgoing President Barack Obama ordered, which falsely assessed that Putin “aspired” to help Trump win the election. An earlier release by the current Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, revealed the senior intelligence official — whom her office identified as an ODNI whistleblower — had been charged with conducting a “scrub,” which is a review, of the intelligence in the non-compartmented ICA. Emails released last week by Gabbard show the top analyst expressing shock over the ICA’s reliance on the Steele dossier because the versions the analyst reviewed included no intel relying on the Hillary Clinton-based fairy tale of opposition research.
According to a person familiar with the notes, the analyst documented his recollection of the conversation on March 31, 2023 — more than six years after the conversation occurred. The delay, The Federalist’s source explained, occurred because the analyst’s efforts to share his concerns, first with the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community (IC), and then later with Special Counsel John Durham and Virginia Sen. Mark Warner, proved unsuccessful. Only later did the analyst receive an inquiry for more information about his claims, leading to the drafting of the summary of his recollections.
Those notes capture the analyst claiming in early January that his supervisor told him, “There is reporting you are not allowed to see,” adding that “if you saw it, you would agree” with the ICA. After noting he concurred “with varying confidence with most of the 2017 ICA’s Key Judgements,” the analyst explained that he “would need to review any reporting myself in order to consider it.”
“You need to TRUST ME on this,” Clapper’s crony countered, stating to the analyst he “would need to demonstrate [his] ability to ‘outgrow’” his refusal to sign off on assessments he did not share, in order to be recommended for a promotion. The analyst remained firm, according to the notes, which led his exasperated superior to reply, “I need you to say you agree with these judgements, so that DIA will go along with them!”
LINK
Posted on 7/30/25 at 10:04 pm to NIH
Like I said earlier, I think Putin had them both in checkmate.
Posted on 7/30/25 at 10:05 pm to boosiebadazz
Yes, he blew the election wide open with Facebook campaigns
Posted on 7/30/25 at 10:05 pm to Bunk Moreland
Check out this post on X and tell me if anyone notices anything...
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 7/30/25 at 10:06 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
It was checkmate from Putin. There was no way to effectively combat it. There still isn’t given our internal political polarization on the issue.
So the real tragedy of the whole story is that "Putin won" if I'm understanding you correctly?
And you're also saying that Trump did indeed collude with Russia, and that the US intelligence agencies did not fabricate evidence against him?
To avoid semantics here, are you also saying that the US intelligence agencies also did not use known fabricated evidence provided by Clinton operatives against Trump?
I'm sorry, I do not spend nearly as much time on this board as most of you, so I am not overly familiar with who's who on here. But I must say that I am incredibly fascinated by you, sir.
Just one more question, if I may... do you also still believe that it is 100% factual that Russia hacked the DNC?
Posted on 7/30/25 at 10:06 pm to Bunk Moreland
quote:
Those notes capture the analyst claiming in early January that his supervisor told him, “There is reporting you are not allowed to see,” adding that “if you saw it, you would agree” with the ICA. After noting he concurred “with varying confidence with most of the 2017 ICA’s Key Judgements,” the analyst explained that he “would need to review any reporting myself in order to consider it.”
Totally reasonable from both sides
quote:
“You need to TRUST ME on this,” Clapper’s crony countered, stating to the analyst he “would need to demonstrate [his] ability to ‘outgrow’” his refusal to sign off on assessments he did not share, in order to be recommended for a promotion. The analyst remained firm, according to the notes, which led his exasperated superior to reply, “I need you to say you agree with these judgements, so that DIA will go along with them!”
Not really reasonable from rando middle manager guy
Posted on 7/30/25 at 10:07 pm to NIH
It’s ok if you’ve never read the Senate Intelligence Committee report. It’s technical, meaty stuff and the redactions are annoying.
Posted on 7/30/25 at 10:09 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
I notice you didn’t address anything in the OP, though.
No emails from Hilliarys bathroom server were leaked. They are conflating Padestas email (hack) which was not a hack (the idiots password was P@ssword) and the DNC data breach which it turns out there was no evidence the Russians were behind it. In fact the FBI and NSA had "low confidence" in that assertion, a fact that would be buried from the official report.
Posted on 7/30/25 at 10:16 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
The Australian tip justified a preliminary conversation with George Papadapolous. If the fbi did that instead of going full Leroy Jenkins, we’d be in a better spot
The reason they did (per "Hung" Horowitz) was that there was a context of multiple campaign figures who were already potential Russian influence targets (Manafort, Flynn, Page).
This post was edited on 7/30/25 at 10:20 pm
Posted on 7/30/25 at 10:20 pm to boosiebadazz
I’ll defer to the Southern car wreck lawyer for the meaty, technical stuff
Page 7 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News