- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 7/30/25 at 10:24 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
Hung" Horowitz
Gawd…..I think that was Bunyan who used that nickname
He disappeared randomly
Posted on 7/30/25 at 10:25 pm to boosiebadazz
Is it true that you represent car accident victims and win them cortisone injections and free physical therapy?
Posted on 7/30/25 at 10:26 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Among others and Horowitz wasn't the the only DOJ figure with the nickname (also Huber). 
Posted on 7/30/25 at 10:27 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
TigerDoc
Glad to see renowned liar and conspiracy theorist tigerdoc checking in.
Posted on 7/30/25 at 10:27 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
You’re forgetting the unnecessary spinal fusions
Posted on 7/30/25 at 10:29 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Mostly percocets until I can get the chiro to diagnose them with fibromyalgia. Then the file lands on NIH’s desk to defend, he bills out like 30 hours in six minute increments over a few months, we settle for 25,000 and go have a vodka lunch.
Rinse and repeat.
Rinse and repeat.
Posted on 7/30/25 at 10:30 pm to Turbeauxdog
more ankle-biting. It's embarrassing, baw.
Posted on 7/30/25 at 10:33 pm to TigerDoc
Mate, do you have alerts set for this nonsense?
Posted on 7/30/25 at 10:50 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Posted on 7/30/25 at 10:50 pm to boosiebadazz
Sweet melt
Posted on 7/30/25 at 11:03 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
more ankle-biting.
With you two buffoons?
I mean...
Posted on 7/30/25 at 11:10 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
boosiebadazz
Is the intellectual equivalent of Rachel Raygun’s break dancing routine.
Posted on 7/31/25 at 5:36 am to boosiebadazz
Brennan himself has falsely accused Trump of colluding with Russia.
Posted on 7/31/25 at 5:38 am to 19
quote:
boosiedumbazz
Posted on 7/31/25 at 5:45 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
Is it really the BIGGEST SCANDAL EVER that Obama asked the IC to detail Russian interference and attempted influence?
That's a bizarrely specific question which seems to purposely skirt the scandal aspect.
An accurate question would be: "Is it really the BIGGEST SCANDAL EVER that Obama knowingly pushed the false Trump-Russia narrative even after the IC had stated there was nothing there?"
LINK
quote:
As reflected in ODNI documents released on July 18, multiple IC assessments released in the months leading up to the November 2016 elections assessed that Russia had neither the intent nor capability to impact the outcome of the US election.
On December 5, 2016, the FBI and ODNI gave HPSCI its first post-election classified briefing, in which there was “no mention of Putin ‘aspiring’ to elect Trump” by either agency.
The President’s Daily Brief (PDB) drafted on December 8, 2016 stated that no Russian or criminal actors impacted vote counts. This document was pulled hours before it was to be published due to “new guidance.” If it had been published, it would have been briefed to both President Obama and President-elect Donald Trump.
On December 9, 2016, a National Security Council meeting was called with President Obama’s senior national security officials, which included CIA Director John Brennan, DNI James Clapper, Susan Rice, Andrew McCabe and others.
After the December 9, 2016 secret meeting of Obama national security officials, DNI Clapper’s assistant sent an email to leaders in the IC with the subject line “POTUS tasking on Russia Election Meddling,” and tasking to create a new “assessment per the President’s request.”
The HPSCI oversight report reveals that, “unlike routine IC analysis, the ICA was a high-profile product ordered by the President, directed by senior IC agency heads, and created by just five analysts, using one principal drafter. Production of the ICA was subject to unusual directives from the President and senior political appointees, and particularly DCIA.”
Later that same day, Brennan ordered the inclusion of “substandard reporting” on Russian activities, which had previously been withheld from publication because the information was judged “to have not met longstanding publication standards.” Some of the information was, later used in the ICA, over the objections of veteran CIA officers, because it was “unclear, or from unknown subsources.”
CIA Director Brennan overruled senior CIA officers who challenged the ICA’s claims, stating “we don’t have direct information that Putin wanted to get Trump elected.
Yet, the Obama-directed ICA published on January 6, 2017 explicitly stated: “We assess Putin and the Russian government aspired to help President-elect Trump’s election chances when possible by discrediting Secretary Clinton and publicly contrasting her unfavorably to him.” The CIA and FBI expressed high confidence in this judgment, while the NSA held moderate confidence.
However, the HPSCI report reveals “the ICA did not cite any report where Putin directly indicated helping Trump win was the objective.”
The answer is, of course, yes. A sitting President attempted to knowingly and falsely frame the incoming administration as having won the election through illegal means could fall under a number of charges.
Conspiracy Against Rights (18 U.S.C. § 241): If Obama conspired to deprive Trump or his campaign of constitutional rights (e.g., Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable surveillance), this could theoretically apply. Requires proof of intent to violate rights.
FISA Violations (50 U.S.C. § 1809): Illegal surveillance under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act could apply if Obama directly ordered unauthorized wiretapping. This requires evidence of knowingly engaging in unlawful electronic surveillance.
Conspiracy to Defraud the United States (18 U.S.C. § 371): If Obama conspired to mislead the government or public with fabricated intelligence, this could be considered. Requires evidence of a coordinated scheme.
The problem with those charges are that each have a 5-year statute of limitations (this generally begins when the crime is complete, which would likely be whatever is considered Obama's last "official" act of the conspiracy), which means we are unfortunately well outside that window.
Posted on 7/31/25 at 5:48 am to boosiebadazz
quote:A boozin dumbazz calling someone else ignorant is absolutely priceless.
You’re ignorant
Posted on 7/31/25 at 8:01 am to boosiebadazz
I'll address it. It was a joke. Tongue in cheek. A smart arse comment. If you believe he meant it, you are dumber than your posts.
Posted on 7/31/25 at 8:50 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
you’re clamoring to go back to December 2016 and crucify Obama over it
Haven't mentioned that year or that name in any of my posts. I simply observe and remark. So I stand by the remark and I'll add,
"Ah the old, I don't have a good rebuttal for what you posted, so I'll pretend you said something else and make fun of that." post. Oh and, "I'll add an emoji to make me really feel smart."
Posted on 7/31/25 at 9:52 pm to baybeefeetz
You're the little kid running up to the car window asking "what yall need?". You'll be an unfortunate victim of crossfire. You're not important enough to be seeded.
Page 8 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News