- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 1/2/26 at 12:46 pm to roadGator
Better call the police investigator
Posted on 1/2/26 at 12:46 pm to RogerTheShrubber
You have comprehension problems.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 12:48 pm to Jugbow
Why?
I’m entertained. It’s free too.
Why would I want it to end? That would be plain silly.
I’m entertained. It’s free too.
Why would I want it to end? That would be plain silly.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 12:48 pm to roadGator
quote:
Why? I’m entertained. It’s free too. Why would I want it to end? That would be plain silly.
Who do you think he is?
Posted on 1/2/26 at 12:49 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
You have comprehension problems.
I can comprehend Trumps economics are only slightly right of Bernie.
And thats being kind.
I see you avoided having to answer the question because you too are embarrassed.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 12:49 pm to Godfather1
Its momentoftruth returned to us.
It’s glorious.
He stayed away longer than I expected so kudos for that.
It’s glorious.
He stayed away longer than I expected so kudos for that.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 12:50 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Evidently you did need to look it up because... chatgpt. And since you have studied this extensively, I would have expected you to know all about the constitution, it being signed, and when it was signed/ratified. It was ratified on June 21, 1788.
The Quasi war. When did it happen? 10 years after the ratification of the Constitution that you claim does not allow a president to do this. Then explain the Quasi war. It was a purely Executive decision.
The Quasi-War (1798–1800) is one of the earliest and most important precedents for how presidential power can be used short of a declared war. It sits right at the intersection of constitutional limits, executive discretion, and congressional authorization.
And you know, since you are an attorney, I would have thought you would have known about the SCOTUS decision that 100% validated Adams. Bas v. Tingy (1800)
So back to Massie. He is either too stupid to be in congress or he knows he's lying and is pandering to his small base and media.
The Quasi war. When did it happen? 10 years after the ratification of the Constitution that you claim does not allow a president to do this. Then explain the Quasi war. It was a purely Executive decision.
The Quasi-War (1798–1800) is one of the earliest and most important precedents for how presidential power can be used short of a declared war. It sits right at the intersection of constitutional limits, executive discretion, and congressional authorization.
And you know, since you are an attorney, I would have thought you would have known about the SCOTUS decision that 100% validated Adams. Bas v. Tingy (1800)
So back to Massie. He is either too stupid to be in congress or he knows he's lying and is pandering to his small base and media.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 12:51 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:Thankfully, as the alternative was far worse. That doesn't mean he's perfect. Relativism gets you mediocrity (at best). I do wish president Trump governened like candidate Trump.
Trump is still your President
Posted on 1/2/26 at 12:51 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Man, you go continue to count 1st, 2nd, 3rd...etc. You have been asked and you ignore it. Did inflation drop from 3% to 2.7% or not?
Posted on 1/2/26 at 12:52 pm to Jugbow
Posted on 1/2/26 at 12:54 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
Thankfully, as the alternative was far worse
Amen
quote:
That doesn't mean he's perfect
Nobody is perfect, especially Trump. I don’t see what the big deal is here with Trump calling for freedom of speech and protest. Is war or military action necessary, no. Trump tweets this stuff out to make the point of FAFO, so far it’s done wonders for this administration
Posted on 1/2/26 at 12:54 pm to roadGator
quote:
Its momentoftruth returned to us. It’s glorious. He stayed away longer than I expected so kudos for that.
I’ve never really paid attention enough to know.
I mean, I do know RelentlessAnalysis is clearly Hank. Like the other alters he’s created, it’s a dead giveaway because Hank is too rigid patterned/stupid to alter his posting style even slightly. The over-the-top pomposity and constant “ackchually” attitude are dead giveaways.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 12:54 pm to Jugbow
I wish for no action either whatever the President says on this matter. I think the concern is about getting “involved” in some way because Netanyahu has the itch and is singing the same tune again. I hope it is all just sound and fury signifying nothing.
The President and Massie have been Twitter fighting for a while now. As I have said before, I wish they would handle these affairs in private. I understand the free speech part, but it is difficult to protect the free speech of citizens in a sovereign nation without violating their sovereignty.
The President and Massie have been Twitter fighting for a while now. As I have said before, I wish they would handle these affairs in private. I understand the free speech part, but it is difficult to protect the free speech of citizens in a sovereign nation without violating their sovereignty.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 12:54 pm to David_DJS
quote:
I think it did, so let's say it did for sure. That's still not deflation.
Roger is the only one talking deflation. That's because he is trying to skirt the fact that inflation did drop.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 12:55 pm to roadGator
quote:
quote:
You’re not a serious person.
Alot of people say it on the PT including Roger.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 12:55 pm to Godfather1
This Hank alter started off slow and attempted to fake it.
But the narcissist in him came out really fast.
It’s hard to change speech patterns. Almost impossible long term.
All the alters eventually go back to their true selves.
But the narcissist in him came out really fast.
It’s hard to change speech patterns. Almost impossible long term.
All the alters eventually go back to their true selves.
This post was edited on 1/2/26 at 12:58 pm
Posted on 1/2/26 at 12:56 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
You have comprehension problems.
He does.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 12:58 pm to Jugbow
quote:
Oh I’d like to know how Congress kept authorizing money and military use for Ukraine from Massie.
Are you saying Massie hasn't been opposed to the fiasco in Ukraine?
From ChatGPT:
Here’s what’s publicly known about how Rep. Thomas “Tom” Massie (R-KY) has voted on U.S. funding for Ukraine:
???? Massie has voted against major Ukraine aid packages
In April 2024, the U.S. House passed a large foreign aid package that included roughly $60 billion in security aid for Ukraine as part of a broader Ukraine-Israel-Taiwan package. Rep. Thomas Massie was among the 112 House Republicans who voted no on that bill. ?
Business Insider
This vote is one of the clearest public records showing his position: he opposed that Ukraine aid bill.
?? Massie’s broader stance on Ukraine funding
Massie has frequently spoken out against broad or open-ended foreign aid, especially when tied to large defense bills. In past discussions he has explained preferring more scrutiny or limits on foreign-aid provisions. ?
Reason.com
He also proposed an amendment to a defense policy bill that would require more reporting on Ukraine casualty data, reflecting his interest in transparency but not support for continued large funding. ?
Responsible Statecraft
?? Important context
The House vote against Ukraine aid wasn’t just symbolic—Massie joined a significant bloc of Republicans opposed to that specific package. ?
Business Insider
Because Massie is a Representative (House member), not a Senator, he does not vote on Senate foreign aid bills (e.g., Senate voting on the larger supplemental that included Ukraine funding). So his voting record relates primarily to House actions.
?? Bottom line
?? Massie opposed a major House-passed Ukraine funding bill in April 2024. ?
?? He has signaled opposition to broad or open-ended foreign aid measures, including those tied to Ukraine. ?
Business Insider
Reason.com
If you want, I can list specific votes by date and bill number or explain the political rationale he’s given for opposing Ukraine aid.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 12:58 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
Yeah. These few have never been Teump supporters. Not in 2015, 2016... etc.
They are and will always be the Rick Wilson of the pt. They believe pretty much everything he does.
They are uni party...some are leftists.
Must be hard coming up with cope like this. What would you call a leader that:
- backed Kevin McCarthy for SOH.
- backed Mike Johnson for SOH.
- threatens to primary multiple conservatives
- Campaigns for/with Lindsey Graham
- Lobbied and got the debt ceiling suspended
- re-passed Biden's budget 2x with CRs
- wants to opens state-run stores
- got the government to take partial ownership of private corporations as a bail out
The uniparty is having a blast. But hero worship prevents you from seeing the obvious. It's fascinating. Very similar to Obama worshipers.
Page 10 of 19
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News