Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Mike Johnson: Releasing Epstein files without redactions could pose national security risk | Page 6 | Political Talk
Started By
Message

re: Mike Johnson: Releasing Epstein files without redactions could pose national security risk

Posted on 11/18/25 at 7:45 pm to
Posted by Jbird
Shoot the tires out!
Member since Oct 2012
87759 posts
Posted on 11/18/25 at 7:45 pm to
Retard alter!

You go fakey mcfakerton?!
Posted by cubsfan5150
NWA
Member since Nov 2007
18262 posts
Posted on 11/18/25 at 7:46 pm to
Go find me that exact full quote that you posted, you fricking lying piece of shite.

Someone needs to ban your bitch arse.
This post was edited on 11/18/25 at 7:47 pm
Posted by retired_tiger
Member since Oct 2025
546 posts
Posted on 11/18/25 at 8:04 pm to
quote:

Go find me that exact full quote that you posted, you fricking lying piece of shite.

Your apology is assumed and accepted.


Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
43538 posts
Posted on 11/18/25 at 8:23 pm to
quote:

His boss is the real security threat.


The American people?

I mean, you goose-steppers ARE unhinged, so…probably.
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
76350 posts
Posted on 11/18/25 at 8:29 pm to
quote:

Then of course there is all the sexual stuff he said about his own daughter.

Lighten up, Francis. It's not like Ivanka had a lifelong drug problem and then wrote in her rehab journal about being forced to take inappropriate showers with her dad.
This post was edited on 11/19/25 at 9:29 am
Posted by cubsfan5150
NWA
Member since Nov 2007
18262 posts
Posted on 11/18/25 at 8:33 pm to
Show me where in that clip does he state EXACTLY what you posted earlier about the Miss TEEN USA.

Show me and I’ll apologize.

I bet I don’t hear another peep from you. Imbecile.

Your first post has quotes around the entire statement. You posted it as fact.
Posted by shoelessjoe
Member since Jul 2006
11319 posts
Posted on 11/18/25 at 8:42 pm to
Again where does it state that he said he likes underaged girls? Trump said what he said about his daughter because she is beautiful. You are taking it out of context to try to paint a narrative. Again Trump never did anything wrong no matter how bad you want it to be there.
Posted by Victor R Franko
Member since Dec 2021
2868 posts
Posted on 11/18/25 at 8:57 pm to
quote:

Some CEO cheating on his wife with hot young (but over 18) girls on his business trips isn't illegal, but I bet there's a ton of that kind of shite in the files.

If money, votes, favors, deals, considerations, etc. were transacted or enacted for the hot young girls, then there's probably some illegality going on.
Posted by taylork37
Member since Mar 2010
15755 posts
Posted on 11/18/25 at 9:04 pm to
quote:

VoxDawg


You are legitimately an ignorant piece of shite.
Posted by Tantal
Member since Sep 2012
19634 posts
Posted on 11/18/25 at 9:09 pm to
quote:

Which nation?

I'm guessing one where they wear tiny hats.
Posted by GreatLakesTiger24
Member since May 2012
59612 posts
Posted on 11/18/25 at 9:10 pm to
quote:

Mike Johnson: Releasing Epstein files without redactions could pose national security risk
the driving force behind what created the epstein files is the national security risk
Posted by retired_tiger
Member since Oct 2025
546 posts
Posted on 11/18/25 at 9:24 pm to
quote:

Again Trump never did anything wrong no matter how bad you want it to be there.

The audio of him on Howard Stern is posted above.

In his own words, trump admitted to walking in on nude underage girls. At the time, he owned the teen beauty pagent.

"You know they're standing there with no clothes. And you see these incredible looking women." (which are actually underage girls)


And you think trump didn't do anything wrong??

If trump walked in the dressing room while your teenage daughter was nude, would you still think he did nothing wrong?

Posted by Megasaurus
Member since Dec 2017
1566 posts
Posted on 11/18/25 at 9:47 pm to
quote:

Mike Johnson: Releasing Epstein files without redactions could pose national security risk


its worth the risk , if for no other reason, to stop hearing about them. Release it ALL, redact victim names
Posted by Great Plains Drifter
Flyover, U.S.A.
Member since Jul 2019
9394 posts
Posted on 11/18/25 at 9:56 pm to
“National Security” has become the catch-all for anything DC doesn’t care to share with this great big nation it is supposed to represent in this post 9/11 age.
Posted by cubsfan5150
NWA
Member since Nov 2007
18262 posts
Posted on 11/18/25 at 9:57 pm to
quote:

The audio of him on Howard Stern is posted above. In his own words, trump admitted to walking in on nude underage girls. At the time, he owned the teen beauty pagent. "You know they're standing there with no clothes. And you see these incredible looking women." (which are actually underage girls) And you think trump didn't do anything wrong?? If trump walked in the dressing room while your teenage daughter was nude, would you still think he did nothing wrong?


So you CANNOT supply the exact quote that you posted earlier and are still going to double down on your lie. What a fricking piece of shite.

He didn’t say a word about teenagers.

Show me a time where Trump said he walked in on a bunch of nude teenagers.

I don’t understand why people like you aren’t immediately banned.
Posted by TutHillTiger
Mississippi Alabama
Member since Sep 2010
49830 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 9:22 am to
They aren’t releasing shite.

They redacted anyone with GOP connections

They don’t have to release anything concerning an active investigation or grand jury info etc etc There are more holes in this this you can drive a truck through than you can imagine. The Washington post, newsnation, etc and a bunch of papers pointed that out already.

Trump could order that released anytime l.

This is just shut us up. We are being scrwed like a 20 dollar white.


Eyes Wide Shut apparently was really a warning and a documentary that Stanley Kubrick died to give us. Clues are everywhere. The studio cut out the part where they had to give up their daughter to the satantic sex cult and girls that looked young from the orgy scene. Trump is too scared to release it and it will never happen
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
34883 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 9:29 am to
quote:

This is just adding validity to the theory that Epstein was a CIA asset used to get powerful people compromised so the government could blackmail them


Yea. Otherwise, how would a sex trafficking ring have any national security relevance?
Posted by AGGIES
Member since Jul 2021
11488 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 9:31 am to
And Bongino views the world through the eyes of a naive little lamb…
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
34883 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 9:38 am to
quote:

You don’t think exposing half of Congress being balls deep in underage debauchery would create a tsunami of resignations and criminal charges? Here’s a hint, they’ve all been screaming for its release because they know it can’t really be released. What happens to our government if 50 or 100 members of congress are caught up in an international sex scandal?


None of that is a "security risk"
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
34883 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 9:39 am to
quote:

I think that's why Trump was balking for a while on releasing documents. It's too messy to release these materials without smearing a lot of people. The problem now is that the redactions are going to lead to cries of coverup.


Too bad. If you get caught in a honey trap, that's on you.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram