Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Mike Johnson, "we are not at war right now". | Page 2 | Political Talk
Started By
Message

re: Mike Johnson, "we are not at war right now".

Posted on 3/4/26 at 12:49 pm to
Posted by BOHICAMAN
Member since Feb 2026
707 posts
Posted on 3/4/26 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

I don't know how many times you guys need to hear it, but he is correct. We aren't at war yet.


Which one are you? A liar or a retard?

I personally think you’re retarded but if you want to have some dignity and just admit to lying I’ll allow it.
Posted by AlterEd
Cydonia, Mars
Member since Dec 2024
7675 posts
Posted on 3/4/26 at 12:50 pm to
quote:

I personally think you’re retarded




Try again, moron. This does not meet the legal definition of war.
Posted by BOHICAMAN
Member since Feb 2026
707 posts
Posted on 3/4/26 at 12:51 pm to
lol. You and your AI are retarded
Posted by AlterEd
Cydonia, Mars
Member since Dec 2024
7675 posts
Posted on 3/4/26 at 12:51 pm to
quote:

lol


Right. Nice retort.
Posted by Cromulent
Down the Bayou
Member since Oct 2016
3318 posts
Posted on 3/4/26 at 12:52 pm to
Did you draw that in during your 3rd period class?
Posted by RoyalWe
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2018
4547 posts
Posted on 3/4/26 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

We're totally not at war because we didn't declare it.
I don't care what we call it as long as we don't put boots on the ground. Otherwise, evil people get their comeuppance.
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
44930 posts
Posted on 3/4/26 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

Mike Johnson, "we are not at war right now".


We should call it a special military operation just to troll Russia.
Posted by DarkDrifter
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2011
5353 posts
Posted on 3/4/26 at 12:56 pm to
Kinda hard to call it a war when one side can barely fight back.

It’s more Target practice on a foreign a-hole
Posted by BOHICAMAN
Member since Feb 2026
707 posts
Posted on 3/4/26 at 12:59 pm to


Here ya go since you need AI to do all your thinking for you. One simple question and a very straightforward answer. I didn’t have to crop my photo like you did to hide whatever ridiculous prompts you had to give to get the answer you wanted.
Posted by AlterEd
Cydonia, Mars
Member since Dec 2024
7675 posts
Posted on 3/4/26 at 1:02 pm to


The distinction matters. It may look like war, but it doesn't meet the legal standard yet. Period.
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
27423 posts
Posted on 3/4/26 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

The administration already said we are at war.


They aren't exactly the masters of messaging.

If people want to quibble over the definition, fine. I doubt there's a discrete line that separates "war" from "military action" and there's a lot of gray there. But the administration has used the word, so it's stupid to object to its use when discussing the topic. Surely Johson has better things to do than play spin doctor.
This post was edited on 3/4/26 at 1:04 pm
Posted by BOHICAMAN
Member since Feb 2026
707 posts
Posted on 3/4/26 at 1:04 pm to
quote:

The distinction matters.


No it doesn’t.

quote:

It may look like war, but it doesn't meet the legal standard yet. Period.


Whatever legal standard you’re applying doesn’t mean jackshit
Posted by riccoar
Arkansas
Member since Mar 2006
4969 posts
Posted on 3/4/26 at 1:05 pm to
In the legal terms of "Being At War", that requires a declaration of War from Congress.
So no, we are not " At War".

We are engaged in military operations to decimate a terrorist regime's nuclear weapons program.
Posted by BOHICAMAN
Member since Feb 2026
707 posts
Posted on 3/4/26 at 1:07 pm to
quote:

In the legal terms of "Being At War", that requires a declaration of War from Congress. So no, we are not " At War


I better not ever hear anyone on this board ever refer to the Korean War, Vietnam War, Persian Gulf War or the Global War on Terror ever again.
Posted by Earnest_P
Member since Aug 2021
5266 posts
Posted on 3/4/26 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

Where is the proof of these claims? Sounds like CCP influencers to me


That’s my suspicion/hope about claims the war isn’t going well for us.

Isn’t there some truth to the idea that we have very low stockpiles of weapons?
Posted by AlterEd
Cydonia, Mars
Member since Dec 2024
7675 posts
Posted on 3/4/26 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

Whatever legal standard you’re applying doesn’t mean jackshit


Dude, you're a fricking moron if you don't think the distinction matters. It has importance in regards to constitutional separation of powers, triggers under the war powers resolution of 1973, and political and practical consequences such as congressional oversight and escalation control.
Posted by AlterEd
Cydonia, Mars
Member since Dec 2024
7675 posts
Posted on 3/4/26 at 1:10 pm to
quote:

I better not ever hear anyone on this board


Or you're gonna what? frick off. Nobody gives a frick about an internet tough guy.
Posted by s2
Southdowns
Member since Sep 2016
6354 posts
Posted on 3/4/26 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

We sure choose an odd way to not be at war.
Seems a lot like war.



more like a turkey shoot than a war.

Iran will soon have nothing to fight with; no airplanes, ships, rockets and zero support from Russia, Russia, Russia and China.


what war?



Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
137214 posts
Posted on 3/4/26 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

Correct me if I'm wrong but congress has not declared war since 1942.
Most Americans don't consider a military action war, per se, unless ground troops are engaged, and engaged in something other than a series of skirmishes. Vietnam, Korea, Iraq 1&2, and Afghanistan would qualify. Panama, Grenada, Venezuela, the OBL operation, etc would not.

Where our concerns align is if this action becomes prolonged, or if ground troops are mobilized as an occupying force. Currently, support for Epic Fury runs at about 70%. That number will plunge if ground troops are heavily involved, or this continues in a prolonged way
Posted by AlterEd
Cydonia, Mars
Member since Dec 2024
7675 posts
Posted on 3/4/26 at 1:15 pm to
quote:

Iran will soon have nothing to fight with; no airplanes, ships, rockets and zero support from Russia, Russia, Russia and China.



If the US obliterates everything they have that they could possibly respond with in short order and leaves without putting troops on the ground, it cannot be called a real war because there is no possible sustained armed combat between the two nations in that scenario. It simply does not meet the legal definition of a war.

It's a one sided arse kicking.

Now the Kurds and the Israelis being at war with Iran is another question entirely. They look like they will be at war.
This post was edited on 3/4/26 at 1:17 pm
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram