- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: New shooting in Minnesota
Posted on 1/24/26 at 6:24 pm to the808bass
Posted on 1/24/26 at 6:24 pm to the808bass
quote:
Yeah. So you saw the physical contact and decided that it wasn’t physical contact.
Yes, playing the game of semantics my original post said “never got physical”.
I don’t think a one handed push, after which he immediately raised that same hand/arm and turned around to disengage, should be considered any serious “physical” threat.
Guy should have never put himself in the situation to begin with. But I don’t consider a half-assed one arm push any sort of threat to warrant how they responded.
2
Posted on 1/24/26 at 6:24 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Not all would permit deadly force. Some SBIs in the wrong factual scenario otherwise would not permit deadly force. The factual analysis is based on the totality of each individual scenario.
How much of a beating must one take before deadly force is justified? Is permanent and debilitating injury required?
And do we get timeouts to consult with the booth before having to decide whether or not to pull the trigger?
Posted on 1/24/26 at 6:25 pm to GhostofJackson
quote:
as SFP pointed out, "fog of war" happened
There’s your quote. SFP wasn’t referencing the “fog of war” you are referencing.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 6:25 pm to David_DJS
quote:
And do we get timeouts to consult with the booth before having to decide whether or not to pull the trigger?
Apparently him and 808 both agree that you can't have all the facts, but apparently here everyone had all the facts, while at the same time not having all the facts, and we need to hold them responsible.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 6:26 pm to KillerNut9
quote:
I don’t think a one handed push, after which he immediately raised that same hand/arm and turned around to disengage, should be considered any serious “physical” threat.
Ok. I agree it wasn’t a serious physical threat. It was absolutely physical.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 6:26 pm to the808bass
quote:
Resisting arrest while armed isn’t part of the Bill of Rights.
The poster I responded to included only
1) protesting
2) while armed
Resisting arrest was not mentioned.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 6:27 pm to the808bass
So I'm using fog of war in the more correct context, and proving the point that facts aren't always accessible, and you're being triggered?
Posted on 1/24/26 at 6:27 pm to GhostofJackson
quote:
Apparently him and 808 both agree that you can't have all the facts, but apparently here everyone had all the facts, while at the same time not having all the facts, and we need to hold them responsible.
This is getting fun
Posted on 1/24/26 at 6:28 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
This is getting fun
I agree. I used to think there were standards to become lawyers. Let me guess, Southern Law?
Posted on 1/24/26 at 6:28 pm to GhostofJackson
quote:
You are so stupid. You have obviously never talked to anyway in law enforcement or military. You are fighting against them. It's not their job to die to find out if your stupid arse is FURTHER armed
Courts disagree with you my friend.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 6:29 pm to GhostofJackson
You seem dumb. Argue with someone else.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 6:29 pm to GhostofJackson
quote:
Nobody in here has been against the second that I've seen.
Look harder.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 6:30 pm to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
Courts disagree with you my friend.
If that was the case the leftists would have far less to argue with. Actually, courts very often side with police officers. You actually know that, but you are being retarded on purpose.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 6:30 pm to onmymedicalgrind
Posted on 1/24/26 at 6:30 pm to GhostofJackson
quote:
Let me guess, Southern Law?
When I didn't get into the lone T14 school I'd have paid for, I slummed it at LSU on a huge scholarship, as I did in undergrad when I decided not to pay for the Ivies.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 6:31 pm to KillerNut9
quote:
I don’t think a one handed push, after which he immediately raised that same hand/arm and turned around to disengage, should be considered any serious “physical” threat.
Go do that to any federal officer, state trooper, or local sheriff, and let me know howit turns out for you.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 6:33 pm to Ailsa
That tweet doesn’t add anything to the discussion.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 6:33 pm to TDTOM
so all i need to do in order to murder you legally is 1) become deputized 2) tell people i felt threatened
Posted on 1/24/26 at 6:34 pm to TDTOM
quote:
Go do that to any federal officer, state trooper, or local sheriff, and let me know howit turns out for you.
I’m not a moron
Posted on 1/24/26 at 6:34 pm to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
So he was recording government officials in the course of performing their public duties? A first amendment protected activity?
While he was armed, and then he moved aggressively towards them creating physical contact as he tried to prevent them from engaging with other protesters who were attempting to impede.
Is your claim that all he was doing was recording?
quote:
And now you express your disdain for our 2nd amendment. You are on fire right now!
There are firearms rights, and then there is someone attempting to start a massacre.
You seem to think the officers can't defend until he fires the first shot.
He moved towards contact with them.
But you can live in your Murse fantasy.
This dude was a domestic terrorist.
Page 58 of 67
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News