- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Norway- 1 in 5 women report being raped. Half of those, under 18.
Posted on 2/13/26 at 10:28 am to TrueTiger
Posted on 2/13/26 at 10:28 am to TrueTiger
quote:
Reported rape is higher. I don't think anyone is pushing back on this claim.
it could be that the increased rape claims are due to the expanded definition, or the increase could be because there is an increase in the act of what was traditional defined rape, or both.
It's probably both, but leftism is the root cause either way.
Please correct and clarify me if I'm wrong or confused about your observations and main points...
So you believe incidents of rape are actually much lower because definitions of "rape" are expanded? Or higher because Leftists have downgraded the "rape" definition?
Marxists may be in charge of LE and the immigration policy, but actuall suspects behind it all are one conspicuous entity orchestrating this entire suicidal agenda specifically targeting Scandinavian ethnicity.
1
Posted on 2/13/26 at 10:37 am to TrueTiger
It’s funny how “me too” dogma demands the acceptance of any allegation until it is against the Muslims and undermines their multicultural globalist worldview.
Posted on 2/13/26 at 10:37 am to SaintsTiger
I believe most if not all of the recent migrants should be sent back but to your point the real rate is:
Now that’s up from 10% which is a massive increase, but it’s not 25% if we’re being precise.
quote:
• Rape by force or coercion (~14% of women).
Now that’s up from 10% which is a massive increase, but it’s not 25% if we’re being precise.
Posted on 2/13/26 at 10:37 am to SaintsTiger
quote:
• Rape by force or coercion (~14% of women). • Incapacitated rape (e.g., while intoxicated or asleep) (~11% of women). • Combined or overlapping categories, leading to around 20% (or up to 23% in some breakdowns) for any form of rape.
This seems pretty bad to me.
This is a lifetime prevalence (ever in their life), not an annual rate or something happening to 1 in 5 women currently.
So the data only counts if it happened in a calendar year?
Posted on 2/13/26 at 10:40 am to tide06
quote:
Now that’s up from 10% which is a massive increase, but it’s not 25% if we’re being precise.
Rape while asleep is a weird one as well. Does that mean drugged?
It is still pretty alarming, and I would suggest that it is likely tied to policy decisions by their leftist government.
Posted on 2/13/26 at 10:42 am to EphesianArmor
quote:
Please correct and clarify me if I'm wrong or confused about your observations and main points...
This is likely what Greg Gutfeld calls the prison of 2 ideas (binary thinking) that this is due to rape being redefined. The binary being that the cause is new definition taught to women (and they are going with it) and not due to physical action under the traditional definition.
I think that rape (traditional definition) is on the increase. I also think that women are reporting on rape under the liberalized definition and that skews the numbers.
This post was edited on 2/13/26 at 11:14 am
Posted on 2/13/26 at 10:49 am to TrueTiger
This is orchestrated destruction of the West. Wipe out the globalists and the rest will follow.
Posted on 2/13/26 at 10:51 am to SaintsTiger
quote:
Rape by force or coercion (~14% of women).
That still seems really high even if it is over lifetime and not under 18.
Posted on 2/13/26 at 10:54 am to TrueTiger
All true in a great sense. Especially in the US where both academics and lawyers stretch definitions for max socio-political propaganda or profit impact.
That said, the "rape" situation in the UK, Germany, Scandinavia and elsewhere in Europe seems to warrant an altogether different set of more ominous definitions and grim statistics.
That said, the "rape" situation in the UK, Germany, Scandinavia and elsewhere in Europe seems to warrant an altogether different set of more ominous definitions and grim statistics.
Posted on 2/13/26 at 10:55 am to Penrod
quote:Anyone with a brain.
Ehh, who knows?
Donald Trump was one of the most familiar celebrities in NY.
He was not going to stroll into any 5th Ave Department Store unnoticed.
He certainly was not going to drag a woman into a women's changing booth for a quick shag unnoticed.
And no one, not Trump, not anyone, was going to assault a woman in a Bergdorf Goodman changing booth, yank down her pants, have her wrestle herself away, then stagger out of the store with her pants around her knees, without being noticed. It is absurd beyond belief.
This is where E Jean's supposed unnoticed "assault" and pants down escape occurred:
Posted on 2/13/26 at 11:07 am to Penrod
quote:
Ehh, who knows?
Most all of us, apparently, except you
quote:
But if it happened the way she said
Impossible without her being noticed.
Posted on 2/13/26 at 12:08 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
He certainly was not going to drag a woman into a women's changing booth for a quick shag unnoticed.
What? No one alleged any of that. And no one alleged assault by any normal definition. Where did you get that crazy story?
According to her, this was all completely consensual, up to and including disrobing. Also, she did not physically resist the sex, nor did she vocally object or show ANY sign of objecting.
Her story is unbelievable, but it’s not the story you told in your post…not even similar.
Posted on 2/13/26 at 12:14 pm to TrueTiger
Probably result of not enough diversity.
Diversity would be their bigger strength.
Diversity would be their bigger strength.
Posted on 2/13/26 at 12:18 pm to Penrod
quote:
According to her, this was all completely consensual
quote:
She alleges that Donald Trump sexually assaulted her in a dressing room of luxury department store Bergdorf Goodman in the mid-1990s. In her lawsuit, she says Trump attacked her inside a dressing room in the lingerie department, where he “seized both of her arms” and then “jammed his hand under her coatdress and pulled down her tights.” After unzipping his pants, “Trump then pushed his fingers around Carroll’s genitals and forced his penis inside of her,” according to the lawsuit.
LINK
Posted on 2/13/26 at 12:33 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
She alleges that Donald Trump sexually assaulted her in a dressing room of luxury department store Bergdorf Goodman in the mid-1990s. In her lawsuit, she says Trump attacked her inside a dressing room in the lingerie department, where he “seized both of her arms”
Fair enough. I’ll restate it thusly: According to her everything was consensual until he turned her around and screwed her.
Posted on 2/13/26 at 1:40 pm to Penrod
quote:My point was that her fictional account was/is completely implausible. She actually testified she ran out of the area with her tights still around her knees. There is no way in hell any of that happened unnoticed in Bergdorf Goodman's. The entire case epitomizes a travesty of law.
I’ll restate it thusly: According to her everything was consensual until he turned her around and screwed her.
Posted on 2/13/26 at 1:42 pm to TrueTiger
It wouldn't be worth it to save these girls if the constituation doesnt allow it
- slow, hank, Clarke, and 3rd
- slow, hank, Clarke, and 3rd
Posted on 2/13/26 at 4:50 pm to djsdawg
scary shite for women
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News