- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Poll worker had a reboot at 2am
Posted on 12/28/25 at 6:51 pm to somethingdifferent
Posted on 12/28/25 at 6:51 pm to somethingdifferent
quote:
Laughably naive given what we now know about Fauci illegally working on gain of function for 20 years
and this proves that covid was maliciously released how? and was tied to donald trump how? this is like the game from office space, jump to conclusions
quote:
Now this is a fact. We're still seeing evidence of this every day.
no it isn't. you're being misled by grifters who are very good at creating a new - and never proven - outrage topic almost daily
quote:
This is definitely not true. Pelosi really did deny the NG. The medical industrial complex really did conspire against him. Major election fraud in swing states. Constant lawfare. I could go on
no she didn't. no they didn't. zero proof of major election fraud in any state. lawfare is another boogey man created by rightwing media when they can't/don't want to explain why trump and maga get clobbered in court over and over
Posted on 12/28/25 at 7:24 pm to SlowFlowPro
What arguments? They’re facts.
Why am I having the answer to both of you in one post? Nancy is relevant because she is the senator from California who told people to come out to Chinatown after - keyword - Trump restricted flights to and from China. What it is so fricking hard to understand?
Why am I having the answer to both of you in one post? Nancy is relevant because she is the senator from California who told people to come out to Chinatown after - keyword - Trump restricted flights to and from China. What it is so fricking hard to understand?
Posted on 12/28/25 at 7:37 pm to beaux duke
quote:
no different than noticing every time you wear your pink socks, your team wins, therefore the pink socks are causing wins!
No, it’s different than that. The bellweather counties are bellweathers because they reflect the voting patterns of the country as a whole. That’s completely different than your pink socks example. One is sheer coincidence while the other is easily explained.
Posted on 12/28/25 at 7:38 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
What arguments? They’re facts.
What does Nancy Pelosi have to do with anything?
quote:
Nancy is relevant because she is the senator from California who told people to come out to Chinatown after - keyword - Trump restricted flights to and from China
And?
quote:
What it is so fricking hard to understand?
The relevance of your whataboutism
Posted on 12/28/25 at 7:41 pm to beaux duke
quote:
zero proof of major election fraud in any state.
Outright lie.
Posted on 12/28/25 at 7:43 pm to beaux duke
quote:Nobody has said that your computer rebooted dumbass....
so some wingnut's computer rebooted
Posted on 12/28/25 at 8:16 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
quote:
Well... care to explain the votes in Georgia that has been admitted to be not proper??
Seems like a start
The power of dishonestly on full display
Sometimes you are just obnoxious and sometimes you just downright are stupid.
Seems too difficult for you to actually answer and I know the reasons but like every other thread you cant keep out of, it is pathetic and a sad way to end 2025. Just keep on losing every argument you make.
Posted on 12/28/25 at 8:21 pm to Marquesa
quote:
Everyone knows it was stolen just by the sheer total vote count for Biden.
This is the sad part. Everyone knows and everyone also knows nothing will happen.
Posted on 12/28/25 at 8:49 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
SlowFlowPro
Who makes election laws within states? Or any laws within states? Is it done by judges or by that state’s legislature?
Were any state laws regarding elections changed or altered prior to the 2020 election? I’ll answer for you, yes they were.
Were those laws changed by those state’s legislatures or were they changed by a judge?
Posted on 12/28/25 at 8:51 pm to Padme
quote:
SLO will tell you monkeys magically became humans billions of years ago, because, well, ‘muh fossils make it so!!’
The amount of people who believe this makes it obvious we are surrounded by stupid people.
Posted on 12/28/25 at 8:57 pm to Penrod
quote:
The bellweather counties are bellweathers because they reflect the voting patterns of the country as a whole
there are 3,144 counties in the us, including parishes and boroughs. you think a statistical gimmick based on 0.0054 of the nations counties means anything? there are even anomalies in those counties where they missed the mark. with that low bar i imagine you could find bellwether counties for picking the super bowl winner, or or the oscar for best picture or damn near anything
oh and it's bellwether. just sayin.
This post was edited on 12/28/25 at 9:00 pm
Posted on 12/28/25 at 9:00 pm to beaux duke
quote:
beaux duke
I’ll ask you the same questions, see two posts above
Posted on 12/28/25 at 9:00 pm to Padme
I believed the election was stolen then, and still believe it now!
And that will never change in my mind....and there is ZERO support from the DEMS that they did not cheat....period.
2020 was STOLEN!
And that will never change in my mind....and there is ZERO support from the DEMS that they did not cheat....period.
2020 was STOLEN!
Posted on 12/28/25 at 9:04 pm to dafif
quote:
Sometimes you are just obnoxious and sometimes you just downright are stupid.
Seems too difficult for you to actually answer
Which votes are you discussing, because I hope it's not the 315k votes. If it's not, cite me the ones you are and I'll admit I was being an a-hole.
If you are talking about the 315k, my comment stands. That story was reported dishonestly and spread around with bullshite and people like you think it's talking about fraud.
quote:
Just keep on losing every argument you make.
wut
This post was edited on 12/28/25 at 9:05 pm
Posted on 12/28/25 at 9:05 pm to beaux duke
Haven’t read the thread but John Schneider would beat your arse for using his picture as your avatar.
Posted on 12/28/25 at 9:05 pm to Rekrul
quote:
Were any state laws regarding elections changed or altered prior to the 2020 election? I’ll answer for you, yes they were.
That's a huge pivot from allegations of fraud, like OP.
Posted on 12/28/25 at 9:13 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
That's a huge pivot from allegations of fraud, like OP.
You seem so sure about your arguments on the subject. Aren’t you an attorney? The facts I provided don’t raise any doubt about what you heard on your TV?
Jake, you must be the worst fricking attorney ever
Posted on 12/28/25 at 9:19 pm to Rekrul
quote:
Jake, you must be the worst fricking attorney ever
You say this because I pointed out that you're pivoting to an irrelevant argument?
You know in law you don't get to just say random shite, and if you do, it isn't given any weight due to the lack of relevance and rhetoric credibility right?
This thread is one making arguments about fraud in the 2020 election.
This thread is not one discussing how Covid affected voting schemes/regulations leading up to the 2020 election.
Posted on 12/28/25 at 9:22 pm to Padme
Until someone gets charged.
Its all by design
Its all by design
Posted on 12/28/25 at 9:29 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
SlowFlowPro
You're on the wrong side of history and I think you are slowly coming to realize that fact.
Popular
Back to top



2







