Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us RFK exposing more secrets by Big Pharma… | Page 22 | Political Talk
Started By
Message

re: RFK exposing more secrets by Big Pharma…

Posted on 9/8/25 at 9:18 am to
Posted by somethingdifferent
Member since Aug 2024
1923 posts
Posted on 9/8/25 at 9:18 am to
quote:

fighting against tyranny isn’t necessarily the same as fighting for liberty
The supposed board "doctors" have spent 20 pages telling everyone why people should do what they tell them to do. But I get that you can't see why that's contrary to liberty and tantamount to authoritarianism

quote:

That is also the one you happen to use as your definition without seemingly realizing it
What I'm describing is simple - the CDC/govt collusion was authoritarian meaning, anti liberty/freedom. The board "doctors" have spent 20 pages criticizing the person who is trying to track down those authoritarians. You're at the point where you're arguing against liberty, from a position liberty I might add. That's called special pleading and smuggled in authority

quote:

Incurious again
I'm a liberty lover, what can I say. Are you incapable of minding your own business and understanding that healthcare shouldn't be authoritarian?

quote:

Some of them were. It depends on who we are talking about
That's all you needed to say, Mussolini

quote:

pediatric ward capacity would be stressed in a situation where we privileged your version of liberty
And the healthcare system would adjust like it always has. The govt/media tried to fearmonger everyone into hospitals being "overrun." It never happened. Moreover, if that's what people choose, then let them suffer the consequences.

quote:

I used different verbiage
Ok SFP. Ackkkssshhhuuuullllyyyy

quote:

I am sure you think you did but again, you have done a remarkably poor job of doing anything
Let us know when you have a grown up response
Posted by TigerDoc
Texas
Member since Apr 2004
11657 posts
Posted on 9/8/25 at 9:24 am to
quote:

The mandatory vaccination should have only been applied to cohorts with high risk of complications from acquiring immunity naturally, and even then you can make a good argument that mandating it caused more harm than good because of the social aspect.


If you can argue that it was decisive in driving Trump's re-election and selection of RFK Jr. you may ultimately be right despite the program being clearly a success in strict terms of COVID outcomes. I think the whole pandemic badly worsened public skepticism toward government but wasn't the cause of it (after all, it contributed the first election of Trump and the backlash to Trump 1 and the 2020 contested election, etc.). International comparisons are important. Most other comparable countries had mandates and have had less backlash and our pre-pandemic political dysfunction is a major part of that.
This post was edited on 9/8/25 at 9:27 am
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39524 posts
Posted on 9/8/25 at 9:25 am to
quote:

The board "doctors" have spent 20 pages criticizing the person who is trying to track down those authoritarians.


Lol. RFK isn't going to do anything to 'track down' these supposed authoritarians. Good lord, you are living in an alternate dimension.

quote:

I'm a liberty lover, what can I say. Are you incapable of minding your own business and understanding that healthcare shouldn't be authoritarian?



Sure thing bud.

quote:

That's all you needed to say, Mussolini



Lol, you were led astray by morons. Sucks to be you.

quote:

Let us know when you have a grown up response



Once you've learned what a symptom is, or how science actually works, then maybe I'll do more than treat you like a retarded child. Given that is what you are though, it is a stretch. Go complain in the other thread some more you loser.
Posted by winkchance
St. George, LA
Member since Jul 2016
6475 posts
Posted on 9/8/25 at 9:26 am to
quote:


Best you got, I guess.


Do you have any links where someone can actually view the studies and the results, with a layman's explanation of how they reached the conclusion they were safe?

Additionally, where they show the difference between the vaccinated and the controlled group?
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
53915 posts
Posted on 9/8/25 at 9:27 am to
quote:

It killed >1500 kids in the US. Is still killing them, actually.

bullshite! I studied this during the pandemic. They were counting deaths WITH covid, not deaths FROM covid. Now that is a small but significant error when you are discussing a cohort of people in the 60 to 70 age group that has a substantial number of actual covid deaths. When you move to the 50 to 60 cohort, the error due to counting the WITHs instead of the FROMs is larger. When you move to the 0-10 cohort the error is huge, perhaps almost the whole enchilada. Hardly any children died, or had serious effects, from covid. This is why responsible health bureaucracies in most advanced countries have outlawed mandates for children.
Posted by somethingdifferent
Member since Aug 2024
1923 posts
Posted on 9/8/25 at 9:27 am to
quote:

It has not happened in a clinically reproducible way
Counter example #1

Counter example #2

Counter example #3

Counter example #4

Counter example #5

quote:

You still don’t understand what a symptom is
Or, I'm not interested in your stupid narrow definitions of things. I'm talking about cause and effect. But keep trying to move the goalposts around.

quote:

it’s okay for you to fail this portion like you’ve failed other portions
Tell me more about how complicated liberty is.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
119977 posts
Posted on 9/8/25 at 9:27 am to
quote:

how science actually works, then maybe I'll do more than treat you like a retarded child.


How science works according to crazy4lsu: I get to tell you what we’re going to force into your body because I’m smarter than you and know what’s best for you, and you’ll shut the frick up and do as you’re fricking told, or we’ll make you into a second class citizen who is unable to own a home or have a job.
This post was edited on 9/8/25 at 9:28 am
Posted by wallowinit
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2006
17466 posts
Posted on 9/8/25 at 9:32 am to
quote:

RFK wants vaccines to be more feared, less available, more expensive, less used.

You’re a physician?

Wow. What a hack you are.

RFKjr is advocating for our safety.

Look at what you are doing. You are playing politics with the well-being of the people you were supposed to be caring for.

My house times have changed.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39524 posts
Posted on 9/8/25 at 9:32 am to
quote:

Counter example #1

Counter example #2

Counter example #3

Counter example #4

Counter example #5


Holy shite, you don't even understand what you linked. Christ they aren't sending their best. Also that last example is drivel.

quote:

Or, I'm not interested in your stupid narrow definitions of things. I'm talking about cause and effect. But keep trying to move the goalposts around.



I'm talking about the pathologic basis of cellular injury. Sorry you can't reach that standard. You would be mocked during grand rounds. Sucks.

quote:

Tell me more about how complicated liberty is.



For you, yes.
Posted by somethingdifferent
Member since Aug 2024
1923 posts
Posted on 9/8/25 at 9:32 am to
quote:

Nah
If I'm not giving you specifics, then what in the world are you quoting in your responses genius

quote:

That isn’t really illustrative of knowing what the specific problem is and knowing how to fix it
I cited specific problems with the peer review process. I quoted comments RFK jr has made about those problems. You are as bad as SFP. NUH UHN. Like a freaking child

quote:

More vague nonsense
The peer review process lacks transparency which would uncover people who are influenced by money. Yeah. That's SOOO vague

quote:

He is not
Ok TDS person. Physician, heal thyself

quote:

I don’t think you actually have any insight into how scientific research is conducted. Hence why you retreat to the vaguest position and retreat from clarity
Yet another simple question that you won't answer.

Did people mischaracterize the effects of tobacco due to monetary influence, YES OR NO

quote:

you’ve given me no indication that he is going to be able to fix any part of what you claim is broken
He's only been in office for a few weeks genius
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39524 posts
Posted on 9/8/25 at 9:35 am to
quote:

I cited specific problems with the peer review process.


No you didn't.

quote:

The peer review process lacks transparency which would uncover people who are influenced by money.


Again, said by someone who has no understanding of the process.

quote:

Did people mischaracterize the effects of tobacco due to monetary influence


I wonder who led the charge to change this...

quote:

He's only been in office for a few weeks genius



Sure thing.
Posted by TigerDoc
Texas
Member since Apr 2004
11657 posts
Posted on 9/8/25 at 9:36 am to
sure, here's a good starter piece on the 3 currently marketed vaccines.

LINK

Happy to walk you through questions about it.
Posted by somethingdifferent
Member since Aug 2024
1923 posts
Posted on 9/8/25 at 9:37 am to
quote:

You can’t follow an argument to save your life
The points I have made are facile and salient. I don't care about your goalpost moving. But I get that you don't understand that. RFK jr made a simple, simple point in the OP. You have tried to muddy the waters and it's not working on me.

quote:

No, so I can teach you what a symptom is again
Knock yourself out champ

quote:

And several more people that you haven’t read
It's amazing you can read minds. You should go on the road with that act. Still waiting on that education in how complicated liberty is

quote:

The emotional posts here are the ones in which you profess to know anything about the scientific process
I'll say this yet again. When pressed, you sycophants will say healthcare should be questioned. But YOU get to decide who asks the questions. Now go on about the scientific process

quote:

Go whine in that new thread after you proved you shouldn’t have an opinion on any aspect of modern life with any complexity
Ok Mussolini, the liberty expert
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39524 posts
Posted on 9/8/25 at 9:38 am to
quote:

When pressed, you sycophants will say healthcare should be questioned. But YOU get to decide who asks the questions.


Well, yes, because you are incredibly dim.
Posted by somethingdifferent
Member since Aug 2024
1923 posts
Posted on 9/8/25 at 9:41 am to
quote:

No you didn't
You are worse than a child.

1. I stated that the money is not transparent. People are influenced by money
2. I stated journals have used unscrupulous methods in attaining desired results

I'm starting to wonder if you're just a troll. No one is this childish, except for SFP

quote:

said by someone who has no understanding of the process
Genetic fallacy. Is it true, yes or no? Are people, yes even your precious medical professionals, influenced by money. YES OR NO

quote:

I wonder who led the charge to change this
So the answer you won't give is yes, people are influenced by money to do unscrupulous things. Thank you for that passive admission of defeat and note, you're agreeing with RFK jr, AGAIN
Posted by texag7
College Station
Member since Apr 2014
41124 posts
Posted on 9/8/25 at 9:42 am to
quote:

crazy4lsu


They/them/it
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39524 posts
Posted on 9/8/25 at 9:43 am to
quote:

1. I stated that the money is not transparent. People are influenced by money
2. I stated journals have used unscrupulous methods in attaining desired results


Dear lord, you really don't know what you are talking about.

quote:

Is it true, yes or no?


Describe to me what peer review is. Describe the process of how a paper is submitted to a journal and then the process of peer review. Walk me through it little man.

quote:

So the answer you won't give is yes, people are influenced by money to do unscrupulous things.


Nah, it is just another subject where you don't know the details and will try to take a victory lap because your ignorance of those details is so profound.
Posted by TigerDoc
Texas
Member since Apr 2004
11657 posts
Posted on 9/8/25 at 9:47 am to
Kids thankfully do far better than older adults, but “rare” isn’t “none,” and a substantial share of hospitalized children had no prior conditions. You're right that different countries handled school shots differently - mostly recommendations rather than mandates, but that’s not the same as “outlawing.”

Also, U.S. death certificates separate people who died from COVID from those who merely had a positive test. Cause-only COVID death was a top-10 cause of death for kids/teens during the Delta/Omicron era. It’s still happening too (~90 pediatric deaths with COVID as the underlying cause in the last year).

Posted by texag7
College Station
Member since Apr 2014
41124 posts
Posted on 9/8/25 at 9:49 am to
quote:

with COVID as the underlying cause


bullshite.
Posted by TigerDoc
Texas
Member since Apr 2004
11657 posts
Posted on 9/8/25 at 9:52 am to
Glad you asked. I think this more is probably good for Penrod too.

Quick note on how death certification works. When someone dies, the doctor or coroner has to list the underlying cause (the thing that actually set off the chain of events leading to death) and then any contributing conditions. If a kid dies of pneumonia triggered by covid, covid is listed as the underlying cause. If a kid dies in a car crash but happened to test positive, the crash is the cause and covid is just a side note. When researchers count deaths from covid, they use the underlying-cause line only. that’s how we know those pediatric deaths weren’t just “with” covid, they were deaths caused by it.
Jump to page
Page First 20 21 22 23 24 ... 48
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 22 of 48Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram