- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: RFK exposing more secrets by Big Pharma…
Posted on 9/8/25 at 11:55 am to onmymedicalgrind
Posted on 9/8/25 at 11:55 am to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
Holy shite this is amazing.
Again, attacking the messenger never the message.
Posted on 9/8/25 at 11:56 am to onmymedicalgrind
The Kung Fu Flu virus was released from a lab conducting gain of function research that was indirectly funded by the NIH. This is pretty much considered fact at this point.
The same people who funded it were driving mandate of the vaccine that has been linked to myocarditis/pericarditis, GBS, and TTS, and we haven't fully sorted out the long term effects from these vaccine induced illness. The risk of death for 0-50 y.o. subjects from COVID infection was practically 0. Based on data analyzed from U.S. death certificates where COVID-19 was a factor, 94% of deaths occurred in people who had other contributing conditions. For these deaths, there were, on average, 2.6 additional conditions or causes per death.
Excuse us if we don't give two shits about what a bunch of doctors parroting 3 year-old talking points from the CDC have to say about the efficacy of vaccines or whether or not they should be mandated.
The same people who funded it were driving mandate of the vaccine that has been linked to myocarditis/pericarditis, GBS, and TTS, and we haven't fully sorted out the long term effects from these vaccine induced illness. The risk of death for 0-50 y.o. subjects from COVID infection was practically 0. Based on data analyzed from U.S. death certificates where COVID-19 was a factor, 94% of deaths occurred in people who had other contributing conditions. For these deaths, there were, on average, 2.6 additional conditions or causes per death.
Excuse us if we don't give two shits about what a bunch of doctors parroting 3 year-old talking points from the CDC have to say about the efficacy of vaccines or whether or not they should be mandated.
Posted on 9/8/25 at 11:56 am to BBONDS25
So no definition of “psychopathy” in the DSMV like I tried to tell you? It’s not a diagnosable psychiatric condition like I tried to tell you?
Took you a while but you finally got here
Took you a while but you finally got here
Posted on 9/8/25 at 11:56 am to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
Holy shite this is amazing.
You can go back and look at the original thread. I know you know nobody else will, so you will continue to save face. My post wasn’t amazing. It was simply factual.
Posted on 9/8/25 at 11:57 am to Errerrerrwere
Nothing to attack. Bonds is so discombobulated he doesn’t know who he’s arguing with and who he’s agreeing with 
Posted on 9/8/25 at 11:58 am to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
So no definition of “psychopathy” in the DSMV like I tried to tell you?
Why do you think I cited ASPD in the next sentence after the first mention of the DSM? That was 30 minutes before you “told me” there is no definition of psychopathy. If I didn’t already know that, why would I have mentioned ASPD 30 minutes before you engaged with me?
That fact you can’t wrap your mind around that is very very concerning. BASIC logic escapes you, yet you claim to be a medical expert. I will pray for your patients.
This post was edited on 9/8/25 at 12:00 pm
Posted on 9/8/25 at 11:59 am to BBONDS25
quote:
BASIC logic escapes you, yet you claim to be a medical expert. I will pray for your patients.
DEI
Posted on 9/8/25 at 11:59 am to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
Nothing to attack. Bonds is so discombobulated he doesn’t know who he’s arguing with and who he’s agreeing with
Typical liberal projection.
Posted on 9/8/25 at 12:03 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Typical liberal projection.
Wait a minute. Now you’re trying to deny that you literally couldn’t tell ererere or whatever was being sarcastic in his post when you responded to him!?!
Hahahahahaha no way.
Posted on 9/8/25 at 12:04 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
That was 30 minutes before you “told me” there is no definition of psychopathy
Is what I told you right?
You don’t have to answer that, we both know already.
Posted on 9/8/25 at 12:07 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
Hell, Joe Rogan can too.
No he can't lmao.
Posted on 9/8/25 at 12:07 pm to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
Is what I told you right?
Yes. My turn
Why would I mention to look at the definition of ASPD in the same post as my first mention of the DSM? Think real hard. If I thought psychopathy was defined in the DSM, why would I need to mention ASPD?
Again…that occurred 30 minutes before you “taught” us psychopathy was not defined in the DSM.
Jesus…..my 8 year old could follow the logic. Even after it has been pointed out to you a half dozen times, you can’t grasp it. You’re why our medical community has lost so much trust. My poor dad and brothers tell me stories of some of the morons they have seen in their hospitals over the years. I thought they were being hyperbolic. Now I know they weren’t.
This post was edited on 9/8/25 at 12:09 pm
Posted on 9/8/25 at 12:10 pm to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
Wait a minute. Now you’re trying to deny that you literally couldn’t tell ererere or whatever was being sarcastic in his post when you responded to him!?!
You dumb idiot. He wasn’t being sarcastic. He meant to be mocking you and accidentally responded to me. He even posted to clarify that.
How can you not keep up with such simple things like posts in a thread? You truly are a complete moron.
This post was edited on 9/8/25 at 12:11 pm
Posted on 9/8/25 at 12:11 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Jesus…..my 8 year old could follow the logic.
Poor child... You reproduced?
Damn...
Posted on 9/8/25 at 12:12 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Poor child... You reproduced?
This post was edited on 9/8/25 at 12:14 pm
Posted on 9/8/25 at 12:14 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
going after someone’s kids is pretty low
For you slow ones, I was going after you, not the child.
Youre welcome for the mansplaining.
Posted on 9/8/25 at 12:14 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Yes.
Thank you
quote:
Why would I mention to look at the definition of ASPD in the same post as my first mention of the DSM? Think real hard. If I thought psychopathy was defined in the DSM, why would I need to mention ASPD?
I've already explained this:
quote:
Very easy to explain.
You were trying to get me into a “gotcha” about the definition of psychopath. It’s clear bc I asked you multiple times to define it, and you wouldn’t. Even went back and forth about “betting” that you could define it.
Then, it’s time for you to “show me” bc you can define it using one of MY sources: medical text. But oh no! There is no “psychopath” in there like you thought there would be! So you Google “umm what’s a medical diagnosis that’s kind of like being a psychopath” and then you hit a quick pivot to ASPD.
quote:
If I thought psychopathy was defined in the DSM
If you DIDN'T think it was defined in the DSM, why would you respond in this manner?
quote:
Will you ever define “psychopath” for us?
Your response: The DSMV can. And then you mention something I never asked you about.
Aren't you a lawyer? Using quotations around a word mean something, no?
The DSMV defines ASPD. It doesn't define "psychopathy." You've already admitted such. You were wrong. Move on.
Posted on 9/8/25 at 12:17 pm to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
I've already explained this:
You’re hopelessly lost. Though I guess logic isn’t something they teach in Caribbean med school.
Posted on 9/8/25 at 12:18 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Youre welcome for the mansplaining.
Did you have to mansplain to your ex-wife why you cheated on her with a dude? Super manly.
Posted on 9/8/25 at 12:19 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Did you have to mansplain to your ex-wife why you cheated on her with a dude? Super manly.
No, she's smarter than you. I dont need to explain things twice to her.
Do you need that repackaged too?
Popular
Back to top


1



