- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SCOTUS Tariff Ruling is in: 6-3 against tariffs.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 11:03 am to MikkUGA
Posted on 2/20/26 at 11:03 am to MikkUGA
quote:If we had leverage, we would not be paying the tariffs. But that's another subject...
While you discuss trade leverage and act like the largest consumer market in the world is not trade leverage, that gives me an idea of where you are operating from, which is not based in reality. The United States consumer market is larger than the European Union, China and India combined. Yet you do not think that is not trade leverage? What fricking planet are you living on?
This post was edited on 2/20/26 at 11:04 am
1
Posted on 2/20/26 at 11:03 am to BTROleMisser
quote:
No it’s not. At all.
Derangement implies some sort of irrationality
When the criticism of this policy has proven to be hyper rational and correct
How is being rational and correct being "deranged"?
Posted on 2/20/26 at 11:04 am to NC_Tigah
SCOTUS upheld a lower court ruling that ruled that the Preisdent exceeded his powers in placing tariifs, as this lies within the purvey of Congress.
The lower court's original case was brought by two small businesses who made the claim that the tariifs were illegal. As long as SCOTUS holds this attitude about tariifs in general, I don't see how any work around would eventually work.
The lower court's original case was brought by two small businesses who made the claim that the tariifs were illegal. As long as SCOTUS holds this attitude about tariifs in general, I don't see how any work around would eventually work.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 11:05 am to Figgy
quote:yeah. Apparently, one can only bring suit if Trump does it, so the climate tariffs would have never been challanged.
This Court would’ve ruled against using the IEEPA for climate taxes so why even make that claim other than for spin?
Posted on 2/20/26 at 11:06 am to Taxing Authority
Good ruling.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 11:07 am to Taxing Authority
quote:
Apparently, one can only bring suit if Trump does it, so the climate tariffs would have never been challanged
Is the Trump admin's push to remove the independence of Congressionally-authorized independent agencies sincere or 8D bingo?
What about their expansive interpretation of the Aliens and Enemies Act?
Posted on 2/20/26 at 11:07 am to nealnan8
quote:
SCOTUS upheld a lower court ruling that ruled that the Preisdent exceeded his powers in placing tariifs
Under the IEEPA
He could use plenty of other Acts
Which Kav laid out for him (and the admin knew, anyway)
Posted on 2/20/26 at 11:07 am to Figgy
quote:
For all of this talk about Plan B, I cannot for the life of me understand why we’d want to go there in the first place.
If the administration had thought Plan B was the best way to go it would not be called Plan B.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 11:08 am to BigBinBR
quote:
!00% prices aren't coming down.
Did prices really go up because of tariffs? I would think minimally at best as they cogs were reduced by other policies to reduce cost.
The price increases were more from the globalist activist intentionally trying to sabotage the tariff policies.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 11:09 am to udtiger
quote:
I'm going to. Just havent had the time yet.
I think eveeryone should read SCOTUS opinions for themselves. The disconnect with what some people say about opinions ("money is speech!") and what's actualyl in opinions is amazing. 
Posted on 2/20/26 at 11:12 am to Fun Bunch
quote:Here's the thing... why wouldn't they have done this in the first place? Is the administration that incompetent? Probably not. But nothing was accomplished with this ruling. Zero.
He could use plenty of other Acts
It's not unlike how pepole kept saying "Mayorkis is incompetent!". No. He wasn't. He was doing exactly what he intended to do.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 11:13 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
How is being rational and correct being "deranged"?
None of those things mean anything to the cultists.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 11:14 am to Taxing Authority
quote:
Here's the thing... why wouldn't they have done this in the first place? Is the administration that incompetent? Probably not. But nothing was accomplished with this ruling. Zero.
The cope-spin is just so pathetic and sad
Posted on 2/20/26 at 11:14 am to WicKed WayZ
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Can anyone explain this to me like I eat crayons? Thanks in advance.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 11:15 am to Tower_Tiger12
quote:
They ruled against 250 years of Tariffs
We all know Trump is super old and falls asleep at random times, but he isn't 250 years old. Your statement isn't fair to the geezer.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 11:19 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
But what happens when you get the Dem Trump and a Dem Congress...
People post about the slippery slop from gay marriage legalization to the "trans bill of rights" in 10 years, but act like a unitary executive in the hands of the Dems wouldn't be the total destruction of the country.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 11:19 am to Fun Bunch
Posted on 2/20/26 at 11:20 am to NC_Tigah
It’s cool that this is front page news on every website and they’ll talk about it for weeks perhaps , yet not a single person here will see any difference in their life at all. So who cares.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 11:22 am to Taxing Authority
quote:
Here's the thing... why wouldn't they have done this in the first place? Is the administration that incompetent? Probably not. But nothing was accomplished with this ruling. Zero.
It is more about challenging and attempting to expand executive power and authority.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 11:23 am to LegendInMyMind
quote:
It is more about challenging and attempting to expand executive power and authority.
NO you dolt. It's about embarrassing themselves to decrease executive power that the DEMs will try to wield one day.
Page 20 of 26
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News